I
saw this on the BBC earlier today: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20003704
Let's leave aside the pat climate change statements: is this any different to
the hydrogen-powered car sensation? "It sounds too good to be true"? This
is the same way the hydrogen-powered car was marketed. This new fuel sounds miraculous,
but it's important to understand that the ingredients for conventional fossil fuels
are present in things like air and water:
hydrogen, oxygen and carbon. This is not
free energy; don't get it confused with the water-powered car designed by Stanley
Meyer and others. All this does is extract the fuel elements of petrol from air
and water using conventional methods like electrolysis. This is schoolboy science
that can be done by anybody. Of course far more electrical energy is needed to make
the fuel than the fuel contains. Even this report admits that, like the hydrogen-powered
car, this is a method of fuel storage and not generation. I wouldn't be surprised
if this story has the ulterior motive of distraction and confusion. See here for more details: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vghjGwvmrqE
No comments:
Post a Comment