UK Government blocked over Syria

The UK Government has been defeated in the House of Commons over military intervention in Syria, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23892783. What happens next? The answer to that question depends on whether whoever is manipulating the situation is Syria regards Britain's involvement in the conflict as essential. One issue that of course will never come up in the political mainstream is that the background to the presence of chemical weapons in Syria is so anomalous it essentially makes any suspicion of the Assad regime moot. A news article dated way back in January indicates that a British contractor called Britam Defence was organizing the shipment of nerve gas into the country from Russia via a contact in the Middle Eastern nation of Qatar, working in cooperation with the Obama Administration in America, see: http://web.archive.org/web/20130129213824/http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html. The title says it in as many words; this was a false flag incident. I discuss this subject in more detail in the latest programme of The Ben Emlyn-Jones Show, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/08/the-ben-emlyn-jones-show-programme-3.html.

If the manipulators insist of having the United Kingdom as an ally in this fraudulent war then I make a prediction: we will see more "incentives" appearing in the news, both real and faked. One has already happened that I pray is one of the latter, either way it is a psychological attack designed to horrify and disgust: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-23892594. We might see even more provocation like this, maybe a direct assault on a British military base, an embassy or warship. A worst case scenario might be a terrorist attack on a major city in Great Britain. Mark my words and see if it takes place! If it does, please do not assume that whoever the Government and media blame for it are the people who actually perpetrated it.

Obama affronts MLK

It is fifty years ago to the day that Dr Martin Luther King Jr made a passionate and poetic speech whose refrain was: "I have a dream!" In those days many parts of the United States had similar racial classification and segregation laws to Apartheid South Africa, with black people officially designated as the social inferiors of white people in hundreds of different ways. There were many black racist individuals and groups at that time calling for all out war and even genocide against the white population in response (this is why I was so offended when the Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan was made a guest of honour at the recent Citizen Hearing, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/programme-47-podcast-citizen-hearing.html); but into this melting pot of rage emerged a man of peace, preaching non-violent resistance in a similar way to Mahatma Gandhi in India, a spiritual man as well as a politician. Unlike so many others, Martin Luther King understood that hatred begets only more hatred and it was important to avoid its temptation. In 1968 he was shot dead by an even more obvious Government conspiracy than John F Kennedy's assassination. Here is a video of his speech from fifty years ago today: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smEqnnklfYs.

To mark the occasion, the current US President, Barack Obama, will make a speech himself on the same spot at a rally to commemorate the event: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23861859. I am disgusted by this and consider it an insult to the memory of Martin Luther King. This is not the first time Obama has tried to falsely leech off the legacy of MLK, see: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jan/20/obama-inauguration-martin-luther-king. Obama may be the same colour as King, but in all other ways he couldn't be more different. Far from being a man of peace, Obama sends drones into Pakistan to mow down innocent bystanders; far from fighting racism, Obama canoodles with those who want to wipe out all natural human races and replace them with genetically-modified transhumanist monsters, less than 500 million of them. He rather transparently sheds crocodile tears over school shootings. I get sick and tired of hearing about "America's first black president!" It gives the deluded impression that Obama is an anti-establishment figure just because he is a negro, one of the people who have been on the receiving end of so much abuse over the ages. But all empires and oppressive regimes have at times fooled their conquered subjects by withdrawing overt power and replacing it with an apparent "man of the people" in governance, but one who is completely their puppet. The Romans did this, as did the Spanish and British Empires. It's the oldest trick in the book! Are Americans really falling for it again? Alex Jones' superb film The Obama Deception goes into this in more detail: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw. Obama is as much a tool of the Illuminati global elite as any other head of government; only he is far more dangerous than most because he has this veneer of credibility. His deceit is also far more ambitious than average because his personal background is so obscure. His birth certificate is highly questionable and many of his classmates at the university he supposedly attended don't remember him, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xjz2mbUxD1s. Today he's going to try and spread the lies even further and deeper than ever before. I hope he gets shouted down and booed off stage!   

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Enemy Within Radio 3

I have been interviewed again on Enemy Within Radio. On this show we discuss the mysterious world of zombies, pandemic biological warfare and UFO's.

See here for the YouTube video podcast: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4kQzfMKqgc.

See here for my previous interview on EWR: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/ben-emlyn-jones-on-enemy-within-radio-2.html.

Other EWR podcasts and live shows can be accessed here: http://enemywithinradio.com/. 

Jesse Marcel Jr Dies

I'm very sorry to announce that Jesse Marcel Jr has died. He collapsed suddenly at his home yesterday and suffered what is likely to be a heart attack; he was 77 years old. Deepest condolences to his daughter Denise and his other family and friends. Here's his official website: http://www.marceljr.com/.

Jesse Marcel Jr was one of the most important witnesses to the Roswell Incident of 1947 (see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/programme-46-podcast-citizen-hearing.html). His father was Maj. Jesse Marcel, the intelligence officer for the 509th Bombardment Group who first investigated the Incident. After he retrieved some of the material found by Mac Brazel he took it home and showed it to his family, including his son, Jesse Junior. The scene was dramatized in this excellent 1994 feature film about Roswell, at 19.17; Jesse is played by the child actor JD Daniels: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zzLptiNfqoY. Here's the real Jesse talking about that night and the strange objects his father brought home to show him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7disa2VJyg. Jesse grew up to become a doctor and worked throughout his life, long after most doctors would have retired; he practiced as an otolaryngologist. He also joined the US Navy and then the Montana Army National Guard. He trained as a helicopter pilot as well as a medic; the combination of qualifications making him ideal for being a flight surgeon. He served in the Iraq War in 2004, at the age of 68, attached to an attack helicopter battalion. During the last few years he has been an honoured guest at many UFO, paranormal and conspiracy conferences. Sadly I never got to meet him personally, but I have always admired him for speaking out about his experiences. His courage was not in vain. Rest in peace, Jesse.

Engineered Islam

I'm not a supporter of the British National Party, nor am I an admirer of its leader Nick Griffin, yet occasionally he comes across some vital and intriguing information; shame he's too much of a narrow-minded buffoon to appreciate its significance. He has recently returned from a visit to Syria, a country currently gripped by a terrible civil war and he has made some observations that contribute to my own research in a startling way; see this interview with him: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2MCZ4QAV7A4. I've explained many times how I think Islam is being used as the bait in the trap for the Big Brother State and New World Order, no more so than in Britain, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/bnp-mad-dogs.html. The recent faked murder of Lee Rigby in Woolwich was part of this propaganda campaign, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/woolwich-muslim-terrorist-murder.html (This HPANWO Radio show gives even more details: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/programme-52-podcast-nick-kollerstrom.html). Unfortunately Nick Griffin's BNP have played a crucial role in spreading the falsehoods that make up this bait in the trap; a fact which seems to escape him in his interview above. However, he rightly points out that there is a wide variety of different denominations and sects within Islam and that in large parts of the Middle East people follow a more tolerant and peaceful interpretation of the Quran, including in Syria. What we in Britain associate with Muslims: burkas, flogging, beheading, bombings etc, is not universal within the Muslim world, it relates to a single sect called Wahhabism, an interpretation dating back just two hundred years within a faith almost one thousand five hundred years old. The main misconception at the moment is that all of Islam is like Wahhabism and that the reason radical Islam exists in the UK is because it's "overflowing" in from its homelands via immigration. What Griffin says above indicates that this is untrue. Immigrants into Britain adhere to many different interpretations of Islam, but they are only radicalized in British mosques after they arrive here. This means that the presence of radical Islam in the UK is an internal problem completely unrelated to immigration. Why and how has this happened?

Well, Griffin is well aware of the hypocrisy and contradiction of a "War on Terror" engineering regime changes in states run by the principles of Wahhabism, in which one of the key allies of the West is the world's principle Wahhabist theocracy, Saudi Arabia. He believes that the reason Wahhabism has gained such a foothold in the West is because of what he thinks are "secret Wahhabists" like the Muslim Council of Britain, and that the Government lets them have their way because they're scared of losing the Muslim vote. I disagree; I think there's much more going on here. The most interesting part of the interview comes at 12.01 where Griffin explains that the Syrian religious community wanted to send Sufi missionaries to the UK; Sufism is a particularly benign and peacefully gnostic interpretation of Islam. He says it was "killed off from on high", but I think he's wrong about why; it wasn't about the MCB and the Labour Government losing votes. He says "MI6 were particularly enthusiastic" about it; how Nick Griffin knows what MI6 wants is a question you'll have to address to him. The main point though is that I think it's far more likely that the Wahhabist presence in the UK is deliberately engineered. The Wahhabist clerics in Mosques are put there on purpose by the British authorities; I've written before about some of the most well-known of these clerics actually being paid agents, see:  http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/07/fake-muslim-posters.html. This means that MI6's "enthusiastic" attitude was probably a cover for the exact opposite one; why were they even involved? The tarring of all Islam with the Wahhabist brush, along with false flag terror attacks and staged charades like the Lee Rigby murder, point towards a major mass cultural and psychological manipulation project. The fermenting of Wahhabism across the world, which dates back to the Cold War, has been done for a similar purpose in international politics. It's just been announced in the news that chemical weapons have been used in the Syrian civil war, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-23809409; both sides in the conflict are blaming each other, but I suspect that a third party is really responsible. We need to expose this for the scam it is, and we need to do it now!

Thirty-Five Years for being a REAL Hero

We hear a lot about heroes these days; in fact you can hardly open The Sun newspaper without the word, in bold capital headline print, leaping out at you. It's usually next to a photograph of a young man in military uniform who has just been killed in Afghanistan protecting the oil industry's Asian pipeline project, and be told what the war poet Wilfred Owen called "the old lie", that he died "fighting for his country!" I myself have done Royal Navy training, luckily only for a few months. I was devastated by my discharge, but I look back now and think silver lining or what! Military training, especially during the basic initial course, is as much about altering the mind as strengthening the body. The new recruit is isolated from his previous life, given limited communication with family and friends, and put into a highly controlled and intense environment. He is exercised rigorously until he is almost exhausted and deprived of sleep; yes, exactly like interrogators do to prisoners. It's the perfect method for turning a man into a biological robot. Those who are not in the armed forces themselves are also indoctrinated by what I've termed "the Military Religion", see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/lest-we-remember.html. We are brainwashed into seeing these biological robots as objects of glorifying worship; to be such a robot is considered "brave", "manly" and has been made very socially prestigious. In wartime, especially during the First World War, anybody who refused to have anything to do with it was immediately branded a "coward" who was "too scared" to fight, regardless of their actual reasons for refusing. The War Office employed the prettiest girls they could find to hand-deliver white feathers to these men in front of a paid crowd of onlookers, jeering and hurling abuse.

What is a real hero? Somebody once said: "most men will face an army before the scorn of their peers", and I think that's true. As far as I'm concerned, the bravest soldiers in any war are those who face that scorn along with, or instead of, an army, and break through their robotic programming to carry out an act independently for reasons of moral indignation. Private First Class Bradley Manning is such a solider. In 2010 he was arrested and charged with treason and espionage, why? Well, he passed classified film footage to Wikileaks of an attack by American helicopters on a group of armed terrorists with assault rifles and grenade launchers... except they were actually a group of journalists and news photographers with cameras and mobile phones. The US authorities tried to cover up this incident and Bradley Manning stopped them. Yesterday he was sentenced to thirty-five years in jail. Here's a very poignant interview with his uncle in Wales: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-west-wales-23786670. If Manning had only been flying that chopper or pressing the trigger, and kept his mouth shut, he might have got a medal and been paraded through his hometown on his return. Oh the cruel irony! Michael Ellner is right, everything is backwards and everything is upside down. Bradley Manning is a real man and a real hero, yet why are there no people in shopping centres with collecting tins trying to help him!? He gets thirty-five over the wall for an act of decency in the face of extreme adversity and those guilty of the crime he exposed are still sitting there in their cosy offices, in front of TV cameras, telling their people to trust them, immune from criticism, above the law. The good news is that all is not over yet; Manning's legal team are already launching an appeal. There is massive public support for him, which fills me with hope, including a nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize by Birgitta Jonsdottir, member of the Parliament of Iceland. The Powers-that-Be have succeeded in convicting Bradley Manning, but can they really manage to make this conviction stick? I doubt it.

Area 51 Revealed?

There has been a US Government declassification of the "U2" or "Dragon Lady" spy-plane programme of the 1950's and 60's which has supposedly led to them revealing all the secrets of Area 51. This project was developed and operated in the strictest of secrecy; it involved the construction of the most advanced aeroplanes and cameras ever built and the recruitment of America's best combat pilots. Its cover was eventually blown in May 1960 in the most spectacular fashion when one of the aircraft was shot down while spying on the Soviet Union, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sZDGiumgH4. The planning and preparation for the programme had to be carried out in secrecy too and so in 1955 the Central Intelligence Agency acquired an old World War II auxiliary airfield in "area number 51" of the Atomic Energy Commission's territory that had been used during the Manhattan Project atomic bomb tests. They sealed it off from public view to test the new spy aircraft. After the U2 programme ended, the base, now officially known as "The Groom Lake Test Facility" continued to be used as a secret test site for the aircraft's successors, like the Lockheed A12 and SR71 "Blackbird". The latest Stealth fighter and bomber aircraft were also trialled at the Groom Lake facility. It is probably still being used for that purpose today; speculation is rife about what kind of new spy-plane and other hardware might be based there, like "Aurora", see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n6vsYNeq8Bc. The base also housed enemy aircraft captured during the Cold War, primarily Soviet bloc MiG fighters. By analyzing the engineering of these machines the US Government hoped to find ways of designing new weapons and tactics to deal with them. The location has many nicknames, including "Dreamland", "Paradise Ranch", "Watertown Strip" and "Homey Airport". Since 1977, when Stanton Friedman first investigated the Roswell Incident (See: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/programme-46-podcast-citizen-hearing.html), the gravity of UFO research has shifted from "lights in the sky to lies on the ground" and when Bob Lazar came forward in 1989, Area 51 was specifically nominated. The highly secure perimeter of the base is now a popular location for tourists, especially those with an interest in the UFO phenomenon, and the "cammodudes", civilian security contractors, are constantly on patrol to keep them from crossing over the unfenced boundary line into the compound. The theory goes that Area 51 is where the Government keeps the wreckage and alien bodies salvaged from Roswell and other similar incidents, and does experiments on them. Although Nick Pope reckons that with all the public attention drawn to the facility in recent times, the Government would have long ago moved this operation somewhere else... unless this is a double bluff... eh, Nick?

The announcement a few days ago that the United States authorities are "finally coming clean" about Area 51 has been distributed widely in the media, see: http://news.sky.com/story/1129390/area-51-finally-acknowledged-by-us-government and: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-23731759, but just how explosive is this revelation? Firstly the CIA documents released to Mr Richelson don't really divulge any significant information than hasn't already seeped out over the years. There's a great deal of difference between something genuinely unknown and something that is merely unacknowledged by officialdom. It has never been formally acknowledged that the Groom Lake base exists; but then again it's never been formally acknowledged that Trident submarines are armed with nuclear weapons, although surely there is no doubt that they are. Besides which, the formal announcement of the base's existence has already taken place. It happened in 1994 when the widow of a man called Robert Frost sued the Government for damages after he died of an illness she believes was caused by his exposure to unknown toxic material while he was serving at the base. The announcement had to be made that Mr Frost's place of employment is real for the Government to defend themselves in the interests of national security. Other similar scoops have popped up since, eg: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2009/04/area-51-disclosed.html. Oddly enough in a TV news story about the Frost lawsuit (Sorry, I can't find it now), the plaintiff's lawyer is asked if there are aliens at Area 51 and he replied: "I don't know, my client never saw any; but it wouldn't surprise me. You must realize that place is a legal black hole. It operates above Congressional oversight, above executive oversight; hell, even the US President himself cannot enter it without permission. One is forced to consider whether it is even part of the United States at all, and might instead be an enclave of some kind of 'super-government'." (My emphasis). These are astounding words, but they are potentially accurate. Indeed in his farewell Presidential address in January 1961, Dwight D Eisenhower warned the American people of "the Military-Industrial Complex". A few people heeded his warning, including his successor John F Kennedy, until his untimely death in November 1963. During the recently-concluded Citizens Hearing of Disclosure, see: http://www.citizenhearing.org/, an interview was broadcast with a terminally ill man in a chronic palliative care home, who claimed to be a former US intelligence agent. The interview took place in March of 2013 and the current status of the witness is not known: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYgghSzOoT0. According to this man, operations related to extraterrestrials were already underway by the late 1950's and that the public investigation, Project Blue Book, was a deliberate distraction. President Eisenhower was not initiated into the operation and was so deeply concerned by these clandestine goings on that he resolved to invade Area 51 with military force if necessary. Taking all this into account I can only declare that this media fanfare about secrets being "finally exposed" is practically worthless. Very little has been declassified that was not common knowledge anyway and if there are aliens at Area 51 we are not a single inch closer to them because of it.