Ben Emlyn-Jones on the ADX Files Show 2

I have been interviewed again on the ADX Files show with Alyson Dunlop. The podcast of the programme is now available here: http://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/adx-files-23-ben-emlyn-jones.

Subjects discussed include: UFO's over the North Sea, missing aircraft, pyramids in Antarctica and much much more.

See here for my previous appearance on the ADX Files: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/11/ben-emlyn-jones-on-adx-files-show.html.

Yorkshire UFO Update

On Thursday the fifth of May I reported on a possible UFO event over the North Sea off the coast of Yorkshire two days earlier. This was responded to by the UK government, deploying Royal Air Force fighter aircraft which attended the scene at transonic speeds, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/uk-jets-scrambled-for-ufo.html. Since then more information and analysis has come to light. Thanks to all my Facebook and Twitter friends who have helped provide this. Several people in the local area have told me that the official story is true because they saw the alleged lost Air France airliner under escort by two RAF Typhoon jets landing at Newcastle's airport. There has also been a photo published in the local Lincolnshire newspaper, The Boston Standard, see: http://www.bostonstandard.co.uk/news/local/sonic-boom-picture-lincolnshire-s-typhoon-jets-captured-on-camera-going-supersonic-in-amazing-photo-1-7363173. Personally that looks more like the "unidentified flying ladder" to me. The RAF Airbus KC2 tanker has also returned to the same area from Brize Norton a few times. This indicates that there are continuing operations in that region. Somebody I know who lives hear RAF Conningsby told that they have heard a lot of aircraft takeoffs recently since the third of May. There continues to be no word at all from the passengers of the alleged airliner, and not just in the TV news interviews, but on social media. In this day and age anything unusual that happens would be immediately captured on camera. This film was made by somebody I know, an old hospital portering friend, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n48NpNQXUCY. It seems that not one of the hundred or more people in the seats of that plane have published anything on YouTube etc. Why not? It's not every day you get to see military jets approaching and flying alongside your plane. However somebody has mentioned on YouTube that he was contacted by somebody on board a fishing boat who saw a circular object out at sea, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKmwcvsELpc. Personally I don't think the Baltic Sea Anomaly has anything to do with this. The North Sea is a long way from the Baltic; being American he probably has a lack of geographical awareness of the world beyond the borders of the USA. The Baltic Sea Anomaly is probably more related to hidden archaeology than UFO's, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/ufo-down-on-baltic-seabed.html. The above video also relates a similar tale of something that happened the previous month. It publishes a photo supposedly taken in Yorkshire on the third of May showing a white disk-shaped object over an inland urban scene. So are we facing a UFO incident, or a USO? USO stands for "unidentified submerged object", although they appear to be the same thing both above and below the sea. If I hear any more about it I'll be sure to post another update.

Ben Emlyn-Jones at Bases 2016

I'm pleased to announce that I will be speaking at the upcoming Bases 2016 conference. My lecture is as yet untitled, but it will be based on this video, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/hpanwo-london-truth-tours-part-9-bbc.html; and it will include a lot of additional information. Bases 2016 will take place from Friday the 12th to Sunday the 14th of August. Other speakers include Cara St Louis, Kerry Cassidy, Peter Paget, Stewart Swerdlow and Lorien Fenton. The event will include the 2016 Bases Project Film Festival and a tour of ancient monuments with Maria Wheatley. At the time of writing early bird tickets are available for £150 for the entire weekend. Later on this price will rise. The venue is Bouverie Hall in Pewsey, Wiltshire.

See here for more details: http://thebasesproject.org/bases-2016/.

See here for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/bases-2015.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/bases-at-barge-2015.html.

And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/the-bases-project-conference-2014.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/bases-project-live-in-london.html.

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 18

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 18, a third anniversary special, is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see: http://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk/subscriptions-shop/.

Issue 18 includes an article in my column, entitled: Alien Abduction Similarities. For a phenomenon that skeptics say is a product of wild dreams and the imaginative fancies of the gullible, alien abduction experiences are remarkably similar between different people, even those of very different races and cultures who live in completely separate regions of the world.

Also you will find in Issue 18: a review of the new documentary UFO's and Nukes, a first article by the Russian UFOlogical author Paul Stonehill, women-in-black along with the men by Nick Redfern and much much more.

Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/programme-178-podcast-gary-heseltine.html.

See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 17: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-17.html.

UK Jets Scrambled for UFO?

(Thanks to my Facebook friend Martino for bringing this to my attention.) Something unusual happened on Monday night in Yorkshire. Loud explosions were heard in an area centred on Doncaster, but were heard as far away as Leeds. These turned out to be sonic booms caused by high-speed aircraft. The Royal Air Force announced that it had scrambled Typhoon fighter jets from RAF Conningsby because of an "unresponsive civilian aircraft" in the vicinity. In the post-9/11 world these matters are taken very seriously. Air France issued a statement saying that it was one of their aircraft that had gone off course on a flight from Paris to Newcastle and was not answering radio messages, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36188979. The fighters located the aircraft and reestablished communications. They escorted it until it landed safely at its destination. However Sorcha Faal's WhatDoesItMean.com website published a very different news story on the case. It is unequivocally entitled Northern England Stunned After British Fighter Jets Battle UFO. It claims that a Russian report reveals a very different story to the one put out by the UK officials. There was no missing French airliner; instead the fighter jets were sent to intercept a UFO that appeared over the North Sea. The media in Britain was then issued with a "defence advisory notice" which forbade them from covering this story. As with her last stunning revelation, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/edward-snowden-ufo-disclosure.html, Sorcha does not provide a proper source for this information. The hyperlink in the text merely leads to the Russian Ministry of Defence's homepage. However there is also a screenshot of a FlightRadar.com page which shows that an RAF Airbus KC2 tanker was deployed from RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire at the time, not far from me, which headed towards the general area of fighter operations. It circled over Middlesbrough and then headed out to sea where it flew in a holding pattern for a while. See: http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2035.htm. This is not unexpected, after all nobody knew how long the fighters would have to stay airborne during this emergency and they might need to be refuelled in midair. The tanker's location was a short distance from the scene, but that might be because it needed to keep out of the way in case any shooting started. The presence of a tanker is not in itself evidence that the official story is incorrect. What I do find strange is that such a breakdown can occur on a modern airliner. It will no doubt have a redundancy system built in to act as a backup if the main communications and navigation systems fail. Also there are no news reports of interviews with the passengers. Why did no reporter visit the airport to talk to the people coming off the plane? We have no "I was flying back from a quiet weekend in Paris. I thought everything was normal; then these fighter jets showed up outside the windows!" interviews? It's possible the aerial activity over the north of England earlier in the week was indeed connected to a UFO incident, or something else that the authorities do not want us to know. Ever since aircraft have been flying, there have been occasions when they've been sent up to investigate strange phenomena in the sky; the earliest reported was over Sweden in 1930 and all through the cold war incidents very similar to what happened this week took place, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/programme-145-podcast-pia-knudsen.html. and: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1078970/U-S-fighter-pilot-I-ordered-24-rockets-UFO-flying-East-Anglia.html. Has this happened again? Maybe so. There are certainly discrepancies in the official story.

Is Ken Livingstone a Nazi?

"Red Ken" Livingstone is a Labour politician from another era. At the age of seventy he is still a vocal and stalwart democratic socialist. With his cool-headed manner and rather autistic attitude to his peer group credibility, he is constantly clinging on to the peripheries of the Blairite "New Labour" roundabout. He has come within a hair's breadth of expulsion several times and even became London's first mayor in 2000 as an independent candidate when his party turned him down. When his friend and fellow leftist Jeremy Corbyn became Labour leader last year, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/the-corbinator-wins.html, Livingstone must have thought all his troubles were over, but it seems he was wrong. In last year's general election the Blairite Labour tendency supported a Muslim woman called Naz Shah who stood for the party against the Respect MP George Galloway in the Bradford West constituency. Galloway fought a very dirty personal campaign against Naz Shah and I don't think he deserved to beat her; therefore I was quite pleased when Ms Shah won and became the new MP. The British Labour neoconservatives were over the moon for other reasons... How quickly allegiances change in politics. Oceania really is at war with Eastasia. Naz Shah is now the bete noire of those same neocons because it's been revealed she made supposedly anti-Semitic remarks on social media in August 2014; this was long before she became a member of parliament. She reTweeted a satirical joke that suggested Israel be relocated to North America and made an enclave within the United States. She also compared Israel to Nazi Germany. As a result she was immediately suspended from the Labour Party and could end up being expelled even though she profusely apologizes.

I think I feel so strongly about this because I myself have recently been accused of anti-Semitism, falsely I have no doubt, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/programme-188-podcast-jews.html and: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/is-ben-emlyn-jones-anti-semitic.html. The words "anti-Semitism" and "anti-Semitic" are used so casually nowadays that they've lost their original meaning. They're tossed around like sweeties to the point where few people understand them. The effect is that hardly anybody recognizes real anti-Semitism when they see it. For example in Saudi Arabia there are no synagogues by order and to posses copies of the Talmud or Torah can result in severe punishment, up to and including execution. At a speech in the Grand Mosque of Mecca, the imam Abdul Rahman Al-Sudais, referred to Jews as: "The scum of the human race... offspring of apes and pigs... The worst of the enemies of Islam... Worshippers of false Gods..." Yes, this is the same Saudi Arabia that is Britain's best friend in the Middle East, that sells us oil and hosts our military bases and did so through a number of previous Labour governments... Yes, but Naz Shah is an anti-Semite! It got even more ridiculous when Ken Livingstone stood up as one of Ms Shah's most vociferous defenders. He related on a radio show information written in the book Zionism in the Age of the Dictators by the Marxist historian Lenni Brenner which asserts that the Zionist lobby, following the Balfour Declaration of 1926, approached Adolf Hitler and tried to negotiate the emigration of all the Jews from Germany to Palestine. I don't know whether or not that is correct, but the point is that Ken Livingstone is saying that to oppose Israel is not the same thing as hating Jews. He then said, correctly I think, that: "there is a well-orchestrated campaign by the Israel lobby to smear anybody who criticises Israeli policy as anti-Semitic." He got into a heated row on the Daily Politics show with a fellow Labour MP, John Mann. This carried on outside the studio as a furious Mann chased Livingstone along the corridors shouting that his opponent was a "Nazi apologist!" Livingstone was suspended by the Labour Party's national executive committee. There followed some extremely poor quality TV interviews with Livingstone; this one is probably the worst: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrBQMJEObR8. The programme is presented by the BBC's Big King Jock of propaganda, Andrew Neil. During this "discussion" Neil interrupts Livingstone continuously, hardly letting him complete a sentence; and replies in a manner specifically distorting what Livingstone previously said. Somebody less experienced and sanguine would surely have cracked under this strain. Both Neil and his co-host also deliberately twist the meaning of a tableau that Naz Shah posted showing Martin Luther King in a police mug-shot and the caption: Never forget that everything Hitler did in Germany was legal, see: http://order-order.com/2016/04/26/naz-shah-compared-israelis-to-hitler/. The point of this meme is that to resist evil it is sometimes necessary to break the law, if the law supports that evil. Yet the BBC specifically misled the viewers over its meaning in order to demonize Ms Shah. Andrew Neil says he's never before heard a Labour MP call one of his right honourable friends a "Nazi apologist", in a tone that leaves no doubt Ken Livingstone is to blame for that and not John Mann. Neil then brings in fellow guest Nick Clegg, leader of the Liberal Democrats and former deputy Prime Minister to David Cameron, who says absolutely nothing rational about the matter at all. He just delivers some typically creative parliamentary rhetoric. Neil only interrupts him once. Then on comes John Mann via video link, red-faced and foaming at the mouth. He is allowed two completely uninterrupted and uncriticized monologues. I'm not a supporter of Ken Livingstone. He has made unacceptable moral compromises in my view and is too busy running with the fox at the same time as chasing with the hounds, but is he an anti-Semite? Is he a Nazi? No, of course not. He and Naz Shah are merely the central fall-guys of this whole farce that is attempt to make the viewing public see British foreign policy through a warped lens so they can be led up the garden path into future wars yet again. I'm pleased to see that Ken Livingstone, at the time of writing, is refusing to apologize for his remarks.
See here for this episode of the Mind Set Podcast where we discuss this subject: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/ben-emlyn-jones-on-mind-set-podcast-121.html

See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2009/01/genocide-in-gaza.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/david-icke-loses-lawsuit.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/the-secret-life-of-uri-geller.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/english-defence-league-in-oxford.html.

Hillsborough- Unlawful Killing

See links at the bottom for essential background.

It is said again and again that "conspiracy theories are never proven true!" Yet again and again this is shown to be false. Case in point: one of the worst disasters in British history. On the fifteenth of April 1989 at the Hillsborough Stadium in Sheffield the gates of one of the stands were opened and a large crowd of people ran in to watch a football match. This resulted in the stand becoming grossly overcrowded to the point where almost a hundred people were crushed to death; and another thousand were injured. It was the biggest single loss of life since the Blitz. The match in progress was an FA Cup semi final and the full horror was seen by millions of people on live TV. The official inquest, known as the Taylor Report, recommended changes to health and safety procedures at football matches and architectural adaptations to football grounds, but the bottom line of the inquiry was that nobody was to blame except the victims themselves, and that it was just a freak tragic accident. There has been a long campaign by the relatives of those who perished in the disaster for "truth and justice for the 96", to take authorities to task and overturn the original verdict of "accidental death". They have been helped by the testimony of PC Trevor Bichard who revealed not only that the police contingent was criminally negligent, but also that they tried to cover up their own fatal blunder. Now finally after twenty-seven years, one of the longest coroner's inquests in history has concluded that the football fans who died in the Eppings Lane stand that day were unlawfully killed. After the judge Sir John Goldring read out the verdict there was an eruption of cheering and weeping from the public gallery and calls of "God bless the jury!" Outside the jubilant campaigners sang the Liverpool FC anthem You'll Never Walk Alone, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-36138337.

What happens now? Clearly this is not the end of the matter because there will have to be an investigation into the proven scheme of deception that the authorities have just given up denying. The reports were reeled off in court about police without proper training, equipment that didn't work and who made foolish decisions. The worst of all was the decision to open the gates to the ground in an attempt relieve the crowd pressure outside. This led to the mass influx of excited Liverpool supporters, running into the stand to watch the game, but in fact went to their deaths. The police also mishandled the response to the carnage. For example, they treated it as public disorder instead of a medical emergency and wasted time deploying police dogs, not first aid teams. Then the conspiracy began; witness statements were edited and the Chief Superintendent, David Duckenfield, lied to the original investigators. Charges now being considered are perjury, causing death by gross negligence and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice. Today South Yorkshire Police accept the inquest's findings and will cooperate completely. Duckenfield and many others could well go to jail. I wonder how deep the rabbit hole goes here. In the aftermath of the tragedy Rupert Murdoch's flagship tabloid The Sun published a front page article entitled "THE TRUTH!" This claimed that the Liverpool fans picked the pockets of dead bodies, assaulted each other in their panic to escape and attacked the police and emergency services. This was a total fabrication, yet the newspaper has only ever issued a lukewarm and conditional apology saying they were "duped" by an independent news agency. The TV sports presenter Gary Lineker called this "disgusting and uninspiring. They have no shame." I quite agree and I don't buy their excuse for a moment. I strongly suspect that The Sun was used as a tool of suppression, publishing its venomous front page deliberately to distort public opinion. To this day, you rarely see The Sun on sale in Liverpool. The Sun today did not cover the Hillsborough inquest on its front page, nor did Murdoch's top broadsheet The Times. They were the only national journals not to do so, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36148748. Will this finally persuade people to stop buying these rags? I'll post an update as soon as one is available, but a major lesson has been learned already, that the legal system is not geared towards truth and justice; if it were then the verdict we have today would have been issued in 1989, not after over a quarter of a century of non-stop activism by dedicated relatives who lost their loved ones. One young man, Tony Bland, was caught up in the disaster and was given intensive care in hospital for over four years. He had suffered catastrophic brain damage as a result of his injuries and never regained consciousness from his persistent vegetative state. On the third of March 1993 he died after the hospital removed his life support system with the permission of his parents. He was twenty-two years old. The victims of the Hillsborough disaster were ordinary people, mostly working class football fans from the Merseyside area. They have been vindicated because of a dogged and passionate legal struggle by other ordinary people. Imagine a situation in which ninety-six elitists were to die at the hands of working class negligence; say the incompetent crew of their yacht causes it to hit a reef and sink. Would those elitists need to hack their way through an impenetrable legal jungle for twenty-seven years to get the blame correctly assigned? What would The Sun say about their conduct in the lifeboats?

See here for essential background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/blair-knew-about-hillsborough.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/hillsborough-update-2015.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/hillsborough-truth.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/hillsborough-cover-up-continues.html.