A large block of flats has collapsed due to fire in
The twenty-six storey Wilton Paes de Almeida Building in Brazil caught fire on Tuesday night. The residents were
evacuated, however sadly not everybody could escape and at least one person
perished. The death toll will probably, sadly, rise seeing as many of the residents
were squatters. A hundred and seventy firemen tackled the blaze, but could not
prevent the tower, put up in 1961, from totally falling apart. The fire was
caused by a gas explosion and spread quickly through the makeshift wooden
partitions installed to turn the former police station into residential units.
It only took an hour and a half for the fire to consume the entire building to
the point where the structure failed. The Wilton Paes de Almeida Building was a
steel-framed oblong tower with four large internal support columns. The rubble
fell into the building's own footprint and some moderate damage was done to a
church next door and several more nearby buildings. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-43973788.
For believers in the official story of 9/11, this event sounds like a
vindication. Indeed Metabunk.org have said as much, see: https://www.metabunk.org/s%C3%A3o-paulo-high-rise-fire-and-collapse-wilton-paes-de-almeida-building.t9684/.
After a whole parade of no-shows, see background links, it seems we finally
have a long-awaited repeat of the WTC disaster. Sao
Does this then mean that because the Brazilian tower was destroyed in this way then it proves that the WTC could have been destroyed the same way? No. In fact there are a number of important differences. Firstly it is clear from the video recording of the collapse that the fire was far more extensive in the Brazilian tower than in WTC 1, 2 and 7. The WTC towers were far bigger than the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building. Building Seven was almost twice as tall, at forty-seven floors. The
had a hundred and ten
floors each. What's more the pile of rubble for the WTC buildings was far
smaller than it should have been. Ironically, it was actually about the same
height as the remains of the far smaller Brazilian tower; this should make
people think. The Wilton Paes de Almeida Building clearly fell to the ground in
flaming pieces; it did not turn into a cloud of dust. So this latest disaster
is not evidence to support the official
story of 9/11 at all. Twin
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/another-911-no-show-in-dubai.html.