Gore Vidal- 9/11 Truther

Gore Vidal was one of America's most famous liberal intellectuals. The word "liberal" in the United States has a slightly different meaning to what it does on this side of the Atlantic. It tends to refer to anybody who is not a table-thumping redneck. Sixty years ago such Americans were even more erroneously called "communists". For many years Vidal was close friends with Christopher Hitchens, another major left wing public figure, but their friendship came to an abrupt and bitter end over the attacks of September the 11th 2001. Vidal, a much older man, had described Hitchens as his "Dauphin". Dauphin is a French idiom that literally means "dolphin", but it refers to a royal title, a prince of the realm or heir to the throne. What Vidal meant was that Hitchens was his young protege whom he wanted to take over his role of principle leftist academic in the USA after his own retirement. On the back cover of Hitchens' autobiography Hitch 22 a comment by Vidal has been published: I have been asked whether I wish to nominate a successor, a dauphin. I have decided to name Christopher Hitchens. However a big red cross has been printed over the text and handwritten beside it is: No. CH. This gimmick is fairly typical of Hitchens; his animosity towards others was always a very public affair.

Both men are now dead. They died within a few months of each other. I wrote an obituary to Christopher Hitchens at the time, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/12/christopher-hitchens-dies.html; I think enough time has passed since Hitchens died to dispense with the excessively maudlin charity I think I granted him in that piece. I was being truthful when I said I became enthralled by Hitchens. I did read two of his books and watched hundreds of hours of his lectures and, especially, his debates. I read a book by Richard Seymour called Unhitched- The Trial of Christopher Hitchens, see: http://www.versobooks.com/books/1159-unhitched. It is told from a Marxist perspective, but was still an interesting read. As I said in the obituary, I don't think Hitchens was always sincere about his beliefs, especially in his later life. He was a man who craved controversy at all costs. His professed viewpoints may not have come from his heart, but rather from whatever part of him needed to indulge in his chosen sport, and career. He was such an intelligent and articulate man that his underlying motive is very hard to spot. He'd have made a fantastic lawyer! One issue he always refused to debate was 9/11 conspiracies; in fact this was his response when somebody raised it in a Q&A: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VL7MuzkJ6Ew. Whether he really feels that strongly about 9/11 conspiracies or not, I don't know; but one thing's for sure, he knows it's a debate he can't win. As he admitted himself: "I can't bear to lose an argument". Unfortunately Gore Vidal trod over that line when he spoke out about his own views on 9/11. The 9/11 Truth Movement has many different ideas and factions within it. One of the most obvious is the divide between those who think thermite was used to demolish the Twin Towers and those who think a secret directed energy weapon was wielded that day. I include myself in the latter (This division has caused many rifts, not least in my own personal life, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/the-911-civil-war.html). However there is a more fundamental categorization. Both thermite theorists and no-planers are "MIHOP's"- Made It Happen On Purpose. There is another idea, "LIHOP"- Let It Happen On Purpose. This is a somewhat more conventionally acceptable viewpoint whose implications are not quite so explosive. LIHOP states that the official story is true, in that Osama bin Laden's henchmen did hijack the planes, the planes did hit the towers and Pentagon, and that the impact of the planes and subsequent fire really was what caused the Twin Towers to collapse; but elements within the US Government knew that Al Qaida were planning and orchestrating the attacks and deliberately turned a blind eye allowing the Muslim terrorists to carry out their operation unhindered. Gore Vidal wrote an article in which he hinted that he was a LIHOP; he already had similar views over the Pearl Harbour attack of 1941, that the US Government deliberately left the base undefended so that Japan could destroy it and therefore draw America into World War II. Vidal said about 9/11: "I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm a conspiracy analyst. Everything the Bushites touch is screwed up... They could step aside... or just go out to lunch while these terrible things were happening to the nation. I believe that of them." For Hitchens this was too much and he wrote an article of his own called Vidal Loco in which he denounced his former mentor as a crackpot. I applaud Vidal's courage and honesty and I feel sorry for him; anybody who has ever been "Hitch-slapped" knows how spiteful and self-righteous Christopher Hitchens could be. He had no mercy for his opponents, only an urge to inflict as much harm on them as he could. However, the LIHOP position makes no sense. The authorities, at whatever level they operate in this case, didn't just let Osama bin Laden get away with 9/11. There was no involvement of bin Laden at all. 9/11 was a black budget false flag attack orchestrated by the very authorities who then harnessed the public's reaction to their agenda. Source: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/news/christopher-hitchens-attacks-gore-vidal-for-being-a-crackpot-1891753.html.

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Enemy Within Radio 10

I have been interviewed again on Enemy Within Radio with Thomas Barnes and Tommy Woodgate, see: http://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/enemy-within-radio-live-58.

I appear in the first two hours. Subjects discussed include: a review of a previous EWR show featuring an interview with the Skeptic YouTuber "Bolerhatman". (See here for that programme: http://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/enemy-within-radio-live-56), and much much more. See here for my previous appearance on Enemy Within Radio: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/ben-emlyn-jones-on-enemy-within-radio-9.html. "Bolerhatman" has responded with a vlog video in which he expresses his disapproval for the programme; I respond in the comments box as "benthejrporter": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqT0IUHxV38.

Gypsies on Benefits and Proud

Gypsies on Benefits and Proud can be watched online here: http://www.channel5.com/shows/gypsies-on-benefits-proud/episodes/gypsies-on-benefits-proud.

(This link will only be live for a limited period of time. If a more permanent one becomes available, I'll edit this article and insert it.)

There are been a whole series of documentaries about Gypsies on TV recently, like My Big Fat Gypsy Wedding, which are humourous profiles of native British travelling communities. They’re quite funny, sometimes educational and fairly harmless; I rather enjoyed them. At first I thought Gypsies on Benefits and Proud was one of these; I should have guessed better from just the second part of the title. Has my mind already blanked out my previous vitriolic bombardment of television producers? See here for important background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/on-benefits-and-proud.html. This programme is not about native Gypsies. Gypsy is actually a collective term in English for a whole series of different insular and nomadic cultures that exist in much of the world. The Gypsies under discussion here are ones from Eastern Europe where they are known as Roma and they constitute a disproportionate percentage of recent immigration into the United Kingdom. The programme follows the lives of several families and individuals who travel from their native countries to a new life, courtesy of the British taxpayer. In the opening scene the theme of the programme is set out in the statement from one of the Roma: “It’s very easy to get benefits in Britain… Thank you very much, England!” and another talking about her family of twenty-two people.

One of the new immigrants is Ion Lazar, a man with a wife and many children currently living in poverty in Romania, but he has a dream! He wants to spend a year or two in the UK and make £40,000 on benefits to give himself a better life back home. Another star of the show is Katerina Cisarova, a Slovakian Gypsy who is strangely similar in character to the indigenous matriarchs of On Benefits and Proud linked above. She has an unemployed husband called Peter who has an accent like a James Bond villain. I suspect that he can speak better English than he does in the show and has been coached to exaggerate his foreign twang. They have eleven children and eleven grandchildren, all living in a row of houses in Rotherham, “all paid for by the welfare state!” the narrator dutifully points out; just the four who live with their parents receives £24,000 a year in benefits. The others get a lot more. The camera pans round their lounge, taking in young mothers sharing packets of cigarettes, guzzling bottles of soft drinks and huge plates of food. Peter struts around talking about how “England very goot. Give me everytheenk! Benefeets, school, doctorrrr. I not go home, neverrrrrrr.” A third member of the cast is Viorel, a young man from Romania. However this welfare king was knocked off his throne at the age of seven when he was run over by a train and lost both his legs; since then he travels around by sitting on a skateboard and propelling himself along with his hands. He left his wife to come to the UK. He sometimes puts his disability to good use by getting work as a part-time actor for particular roles in the movies, but he can also earn £200 a day busking with his accordion… and claiming £750 a month in benefits of course. He reckons that this is not enough and he needs more, even though he has been given quite a large house in Nottingham, and his parents and nephew have been brought over from Romania specially to act as his carers. The amount of money they cost the nation is carefully included in the introduction of all the characters in the programme. Katerina speaks no English, but she doesn’t really need to because the council have employed a Roma language interpreter especially for her and she loses her temper at one point when her Job Seekers Allowance is sanctioned; her interpreter makes a few phone calls and gets it restored plus £500 of back-pay. All this is done at a community centre where the signs are in over a dozen different languages. She’s relieved because all her grandchildren are asking for luxury items and she wants to buy them. Ion travels all the way to Britain overland on a coach and claims child benefit for his children, even though they’re back home in Romania and he quite openly states that he intends to steal food and money as well as earn it. “If I am working alone in a house I will take money if it’s left there.” He’s already been deported once for working without a permit, but he just came straight back. He’s today trading scrap metal which he picks up wherever he can find it, whether legally or not. The council moves Peter and Katerina into a much bigger and more expensive house, but there the lino is cracked and it needs a new boiler so they agree to the improvements. A few hundred yards away an entire house has been given to their daughter Petra and her two year old son, “the next generation of immigrants living off the state!” Petra says: “I get tax credit, housing benefit and all. I never go home to Slovakia; living in the UK is very good.” 

The purpose of Gypsies on Benefits and Proud is to make the viewer’s blood boil. Its rhetoric is almost as palpable as that in On Benefits and Proud. As with the former, its theme is simple, monolithic and aimed to appeal to any viewer, no matter what their level of intelligence or education. On Benefits portrayed unemployed people as the public enemy on which to blame our country’s economic woes; Gypsies on does exactly the same with immigrants. This is something I’ve discussed many times, how anti-immigration hysteria is being deliberately provoked in order to justify all kinds of fundamental changes to society that would otherwise be very unwelcome and which the people would never accept. The only feature of the programme that surprised me was that none of the characters were Muslims. A clue to all this is even given to us in the programme itself, when Ion and his cronies go and register at their local GP surgery. The receptionist demands identity checks on all of them; and this is something the UK Government is currently trying to bring into the NHS, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/07/health-tourism-crackdown.html. The ultimate goal is for there to be an electronic identity and entitlement system which everybody will have to be included on in order to function in any way within society, no matter whether you’re foreign or native. I can see a time when there will be no passports, no cash, no forms to fill out, and no licenses of any kind; instead we will all carry a single biometric tag connected to a national or international database that does all those jobs. Maybe it will be inserted directly into our body. This will give the authorities complete control over our entire lives; this is their objective… all they need is a reason to do it which the people will support. I wonder if Channel 5 are planning on making a programme called Bankers on Benefits and Proud; after all the bailout of 2008 cost the exchequer the equivalent of supporting every unemployed person and immigrant in Britain, based on the current rates, for almost a century. Somehow I doubt it. The good news is that many people are seeing through the flannel, based on some of the comments underneath on the video page. I know not everybody who watched Gypsies on will be reading this review, but if they are I’d like them to rein in their rage and look at the situation more rationally. I agree that mass-immigration is causing problems in all Western nations, but the reaction of “Send the bastards all back where they came from!” is a controlled response. This is how the governments want us to react. As I’ve said before, there is no frying pan so bad it warrants us jumping into a fire to escape from it. The genuine solution to mass-immigration has to address the cause. To be fair, Gypsies on does that, inadvertently I’m sure, while all the news coverage about this subject doesn’t. It is a very obvious question: Why do so many people want to come to Britain in the first place? And the answer is very simple: Life in this country is so much better than in many other parts of the world. Immigrants are not "lazy scroungers!", they are ordinary people just like you and me who are doing exactly what we would do if we were in their shoes. Most immigrants are not coming from wealthy Western nations; they are coming from Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe and other regions hit by extreme poverty, famine and war. In my view, the answer therefore is to improve the quality of life in those regions so that people won't want to leave their homelands; after all, who's going to come to England for the weather? Let nobody kid you into thinking that it’s not possible; it's actually very easy: we can start by releasing Third World countries from their economic bondage through the cancellation of debt and land occupation. End all the manipulated wars over the resources in these regions. That alone would probably do the trick, before we even begin delving into the more outlandish elements like UFO Disclosure, the declassification of Free Energy and natural farming methods like ORMUS and Terra Preta. See here for more details: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/05/immigration-and-new-iron-curtain.html. All in all I give Gypsies on Benefits and Proud minus 5 stars. Utterly abysmal television. It’s almost as bad as On Benefits and Proud. I also suspect that, like the former, it’s been carefully edited to make a false point, and that the cast are exceptions rather than the norm. I recently read John Pilger’s book Heroes, which has a chapter about Pakistani immigrants in the early 1980’s and the decrepit penniless squalor they had to live in. I also live with three Sudanese men and have learnt a lot about the difficulties they face. Don’t believe the hype, guys. It’s time to get wise.  

Drinking Bird

The drinking bird is a popular toy or mobile ornament that has been around for about a century, but it exhibits an extraordinary characteristic; it appears to be a perpetual motion device. The drinking bird is a dumbbell-shaped glass chamber evacuated of air and half-filled with a volatile liquid like dicholoromethane or acetone; the rest of the space is filled by vapour from the liquid. The central column of the dumbbell forms a tube and in one of the ends, this tube extends down like a drinking straw so that it opens out beneath the surface of the liquid pool when the device is held with that end downwards; this will henceforth be called the bottom end, and the other the top end. The top end’s outer surface is covered by an absorbent textile, like felt; this is usually coloured and decorated with feathers so that it resembles a bird’s head. The chamber is then balanced on a pivot attached to a stand so that it can swing freely back and forth, and then the whole assembly is placed next to an open-topped container of water, like a drinking glass. When you tip the chamber over so that it is almost horizontal, the top end dips into the water and the textile absorbs some of the water. The weight of the liquid is slightly higher in the bottom end because the angle is not quite horizontal so the chamber tilts back to the vertical, dragged by the weight of the liquid in the bottom end. Once out of the water the textile dries, which draws heat out of the top end and makes the vapour inside cool down. This then condenses leaving behind a vacuum. The vacuum then sucks the liquid from the bottom end up the tube to the top. The top end becomes heavier this time and the chamber tilts back down into the water, and then the dry textile absorbs some again. This action raises the end of the tube in the bottom end above the level of the liquid and the entire tube drains. This breaks the vacuum and equalizes the vapour pressure between the two ends, the liquid held by suction in the top end flows back to the bottom, the bottom becomes heavy and the cycle begins again. Once you have started the drinking bird going it will theoretically continue forever. So long as you keep the water topped up and leaving aside practicalities such as wear and tear on the pivot. This is why the toy is sometimes referred to as a miniature chemistry demonstration or heat engine. The heat effects within the system produce work, the movement of the entire assembly. However the literature on the subject emphasizes that the drinking bird is not a perpetual motion device. Even though it will run infinitely, it cannot function without an external heat source within the ambient air to evapourate the water in the textile. In that way it’s similar to a wind turbine which is also not a perpetual motion device even though it too will spin forever, because it will only do so for as long as the wind keeps blowing.

A real perpetual motion device is something entirely different, it generates energy internally. If you search for images and designs for perpetual motion devices you’ll find all kinds. They’re usually a fairly simple mechanical engine in which the work they do is fed back to the input of the system through various means; water wheels, balls running on tracks, a network of cogs etc. According to the science you’ll learn at school and university this should be impossible because it violates the laws of entropy, conservation of energy and thermodynamics. This basically means you can’t get more energy out of something than you put into it. For example, my own design for a perpetual motion machine would be a dynamo that charges a circuit to run an electric light. That light shines onto a photovoltaic cell which powers a motor which both turns the dynamo and spins another shaft onto which I can attach a second generator for other purposes. The problem is obvious to anybody trained in no more than schoolboy science: Suppose the dynamo produced twenty watts of power, then at least twenty watts will be needed to spin it. That twenty watts will then be transferred to the light, which cannot emit more radiated energy than twenty watts onto the photovoltaic cell. That photovoltaic cell is the source for the spinning of the dynamo and that requires all twenty of those watts; there will be none spare for turning the second generator. In fact it gets worse, because in practice even the closed loop sans generator would be impossible because resistance in the circuits and other inevitable forms of inefficiency would mean a spiralling loss of power from the moment you started it. The whole set up would grind to a halt very quickly even without the second generator to deal with. This hasn’t stopped hundreds of inventors from trying to build one though, over many hundreds of years. Some men even became obsessed to the point of madness in their quest. There have sadly been many fakes, fraud and error, which always happens when so much is at stake and so much passion aroused. The motive is obvious; once a working perpetual motion machine is invented it will produce energy without any input of fuel, in other words: free energy. Here’s an interesting documentary about perpetual motion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c6UgV3gVmd0.

Should we be so swift to dismiss the possibility of perpetual motion? After all, I’ve been saying for a long time how I think free energy exists and that the authorities are covering it up, for example see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/05/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-truth-juice-hull.html. What’s the difference between my assertion and those of a perpetual motion inventor? In essence nothing; there’s merely an arbitrary intuitive barrier drawn between ideas involving emergent concepts like electrogravitics and the Hutchison Effect, and those which merely tinker with existing mechanical principles. It’s very much an assumption on our part that we’ll never find an answer through fiddling with cogs and springs. You may disagree and argue that if existing mechanical engineering had this latent ability waiting to be discovered it would already have been a long time ago. Would it? We hear all the time how oil companies are trying to suppress free energy inventions, however the free energy cover up goes back at least to the 19^th century when coal was the world’s principle fossil fuel, not oil; and simple mechanics was the only technology. We also know that forces exist in nature that appear to have no energy source, like gravity, magnetism and the nuclear forces. It might be possible to harness those forces and direct them for our own use. The Brownian ratchet is an example of how somebody tried to use molecular motion to run a motor, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brownian_ratchet. The machine you see in the opening scene of the documentary A Machine to Die For linked above is probably powered by the magnets. Free energy does not always need Large Hadron Collider level technology to be created. It can emerge in surprisingly simple systems and even exists in nature. According to Viktor Schauberger the trout he saw swimming in cold Austrian rivers propelled themselves using a zero point energy source which they harvested directly from the water itself. He built watercourses and turbines that used this inherent energy in water that he discovered, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jDTiP6ytNVU. Schauberger was pressured into working for the Nazis when they annexed Austria in 1938 and his work went underground, but others have been inspired by his contribution. Did you know that the water hammer effect might sometimes be a trigger for a zero point energy upwelling? So when you open a tap or flush a toilet and hear an annoying growling vibration coming from under the floorboards it’s time to call the plumber. But remember that might be, sometimes but not always, a free energy effect? One inventor has built a generator based on this, see here at the start of the programme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xHISTsiR9qc. It’s still possible that some feature of known solids or liquids and how they interact inside an engine that was invented hundreds of years ago and is routinely used today, or is even obsolete, could be producing a zero point energy effect right under our noses; and it just takes some genius, thinking outside the box, to spot it. Also of course we shall need a political and economic landscape in which free energy already spotted can be used legally. So the laws of physics are not wrong. Working perpetual motion and free energy devices are not breaking them by producing more power then they consume; it’s just that the input power is coming from a source beyond what we currently know about, therefore we don’t see it and misunderstand. Going back to the drinking bird, I doubt if this little gift shop trinket is really exhibiting free energy potential in its usual form; I’m sure it really is just a heat engine run by thermal transfer. But seeing as the best potential free energy machines, at least those based on simple principles, involve water, would it be possible to design a drinking bird device using water for the fluid inside the chamber? Well, we’d need a far hotter ambient temperature, to vapourize the water inside and also the head end would need to be soaked in a very different substance, one with a far higher boiling point. If this were done though, would we see something new happening? Would we see a free energy drinking bird?

Karen Hudes on who Really controls the World

A couple of months ago I discussed the illicit revelations of the former World Bank official Karen Hudes, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/world-bank-whistleblower.html. Since then every time she opens her mouth her declarations become more and more explosive. From the start she said that there were “corrupt forces” in control of the world’s economy, a cabal which places its agents in all the major governments and corporations. Most recently she has announced that there was a botched false flag nuclear attack on October the 8^th last year in Charleston, South Carolina USA. What’s more there are initiates of the Knights Templar high up in the White House administration. In a recent interview on Red Ice Radio she stunned even those closest to her hitherto when she explained how there is a group behind the Jesuits whom she accuses of the Kennedy Assassination and the manipulated dollar crash. They are “not human beings”. She cites a neurologist called Dr Edward Spencer, however many of us will already be familiar with this idea because it’s been widely written about by David Icke, Credo Mutwa, Brian Desborough and many others. The ruling elites of the world from Egypt and other ancient civilizations are descended from extraterrestrial intelligent beings and those bloodlines still control the world today. According to Hudes, aliens abductions are MilAbs, military abductions, staged by these beings; they are not from outer space but are a second intelligent species from right here on Earth. For some people this new development goes too far, and the question has inevitably emerged of whether Ms Hudes is a disinformer or a placewoman put out to discredit other financial whistleblowers (Ironically Hudes accuses Edward Snowden of being one of them). It’s always wise to be on our guard against that kind of thing, for example check this out: http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=301922, but I advise against throwing Karen Hudes into that dustbin right now. I have other reasons to take seriously what David Icke and others have been saying for many years; if so why shouldn’t Karen Hudes have come across the same information? She only brings up the subject of the second species after the Henrik, the Red Ice presenter, pushes her. At first she doesn’t want to talk about it; she says: “There are still some groups behind them (the Jesuits) but we’re still working to understand who those groups are; and if I start telling you, you won’t listen to the rest of it.” Henrik says: “Why not? I think you should. Here’s your opportunity to get to the core of it.” See here from 21.40: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3cIDKZkLY7c. What’s more she was right in her prediction about the strange continuing slump in the price of gold. In my view, it’s very premature to slap on the shill tag, at least not to the point where it becomes a permanent tattoo.

Save the Stonehenge Sunrise

When I first brought this up on Facebook people told me it was an April Fool’s joke, but it wasn’t. The Ministry of Defence is expanding the Larkhill military installations on the Salisbury Plain; this development will include new barracks for hundreds of redeployed troops and their families. The problem is that the project might involve constructing buildings which breach the Stonehenge sun-gap. This is an area of land which makes up the horizon for somebody standing at the focal point of Stonehenge where on the Summer Solstice, the 21^st of June, the sun rises in a line of sight specially designed by the builders of the monument. The sun gap was established over a century ago in the early history of the Larkhill garrison. A set of aircraft hangers was built there in 1910, but it was agreed upon by the land owner of Stonehenge, a long time before it was bought by English Heritage, and the Ministry of War that a gap should be left on the point the Solstice sunrise is visible where nothing could be built that would obstruct the view of the sunrise from Stonehenge; it’s only a hundred and fifty yards across. This new proposal might breach that agreement. The MoD established a consultation period which ended on April the 1st, hence the misplaced suspicion of April Foolery; however this is not a deadline. It’s still early days yet in the planning application process and the druids and other pagan leaders at Stonehenge are confident that the sun-gap agreement will be sustained. Respecting the sun-gap will probably be inconsequential for the Larkhill barracks expansion; however, it behoves us to monitor this situation carefully over the coming months and not become too complacent. Better remain alert than fail to act before it’s too late. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqLQaP0E17I and: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-wiltshire-26525129.

Stonehenge is one of many hundreds of ancient megalithic sites in the British Isles, but it is by far the most famous; probably because it’s one of the most elaborate and complex. It was aligned with meticulous precision to denote the position of the sun throughout the year, some say the moon and constellations too. It represents a lost wisdom, a primeval halcyon age before the Illuminati took control of the world. The way that such a place might be so thoughtlessly overlooked in the modern world seems very appropriate. You might argue that the monument is not being overlooked; that’s the point of the sun-gap and how the Government has been very cooperative about the whole business for over a hundred years now. However I suspect that this agreeable attitude they have comes merely from the fact that in this situation it’s no big deal to them. They still have plenty of room on Salisbury Plain to plonk their barracks elsewhere if necessary. But if it came to a head and they wanted that land badly enough, they’d take it without a second thought. As the historian Michael Wood once said, we’ve seen the end of sacred times, the triumph of profane times. Nothing symbolizes that profanity for me more than modern mechanized warfare. So there is something eerily poignant about this issue. That being said however, I don’t think Stonehenge is the most symbolic example that could have occurred; we’re not in the Avatar movie yet. On my visits to Stonehenge I’ve felt the same as many other people have about the place: it has a bad psychic atmosphere, a sense of darkness. It’s as if terrible things have happened there. The archaeological evidence supports that because many bodies have been found around the area of people who died by violence. It could be that a huge battle was fought there, or a mass human sacrifice. These skeletons date back to the era that the monument was built which demonstrates what I’ve said before, that an absence of the Illuminati does not necessarily equal the presence of paradise, and I don’t think it ever will. There are also many witnesses who have gone on record stating that the site has been used for satanic ritual activity in historical times too, even shockingly close to the present day. The purpose of these rituals may be to poison the Earth’s aetheric grid with dark energy and many sacred sites are satanically abused for this reason. This is why churches are often built on ley lines. Maybe destroying the sun-gap with a military installation is simply the Satanic Elite’s new method in their omnicidal and ecocidal War on Terra. Either way, I’m glad that the spiritual guardians of Stonehenge seem to be nicely on the ball and I don’t think the authorities will get away with their plot. Nevertheless, watch them like a hawk!

Freedom for Venice

A strange story has appeared in The Daily Telegraph about a police raid on a house in Italy. They arrested the controversial politician Franco Rocchetta, one of twenty-four people taken into custody on charges of terrorism. They had allegedly been constructing explosives and weapons of war, including a tank-like armoured vehicle converted from a bulldozer. Source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/italy/10739392/Venice-independence-movement-turns-to-terrorism.html. These people are just one part of a full-spectrum political movement demanding independence for Venice. Somebody unfamiliar with Italian politics would find that notion hard to understand; Venice is just a city in Italy, isn’t it? A bit like Swindon is in England? No, Italy as the nation state we know today is actually a fairly recent construction that was born out of the unification of various autonomous kingdoms and republics during the 19^th century. Venice was one of them. This animated map shows the entire process from beginning to end: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Italian-unification.gif. At the time this was seen as a very progressive and assertive move because a united Italy hopefully would have the power to stand up to the domination of Europe by Austria and Napoleonic France, but it’s seen that way no longer. Venice is more than just a place with museums and pretty buildings where tourists can float down the canals in boats. It was capital to an entire country that lasted for over a thousand years before Italian unification. It has its own culture and its own language and was called the Venetian Republic. The language was banned for many years under Benito Mussolini’s regime, but it today it has over two million speakers and is regarded similarly to Welsh in Wales. Many people who live in Venice now wish to become independent from Italy and reestablish the old Venetian order. What’s more there are still rumours circulating that modern Italy itself was engineered into existence by a globalist conspiracy; Umberto Eco’s 2010 novel The Prague Cemetery fictionalizes this idea very perceptively: http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Prague-Cemetery-Umberto-Eco/dp/0099555972. In the last couple of years Venetian nationalism has resurged, probably due to the economic crash and fears concerning the increasing domination of the European Union and its decrepit currency the Euro which replaced the Lira in 2002. Over the last two years a series of opinion polls appear to support the popular movement of secession from Rome. A well-developed provisional state has been in place for some time, as well as discussions on matters such as where the borders of the nation should be. This could cause problems as the old Venetian Republic’s territories were far more extensive than those of the modern Veneto region. It would include large chunks of the neighbouring regions of Lombardy and Trentino. Doubtless in the case of independence there would conflict between the Venetians and Italian unionists in those areas who would find themselves an ethnic minority all of a sudden. Wars have often broken out in such situations. The government in Rome (and I do mean all definitions of that term!) would be only too happy to inflame such a conflict, as the British did in Northern Ireland for many centuries. If bombs start exploding in Venice they will be blamed on separatists and/or their opponents; however don’t automatically assume that such blame is correctly placed. This book, The Nemesis File by Paul Bruce, was banned for a long time in the UK and it gives a startling insight into the background of false flag terrorist attacks, see: http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Nemesis-File-Story-Execution/dp/185782167X.

 

I’ve written several times now about the Scottish independence movement. In a few months’ time the people of Scotland will vote in a referendum on whether or not they should stay in the United Kingdom, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/what-next-for-scottish-independence.html. My chief concern if the Yes vote wins is that on leaving the UK Scotland would be immediately gobbled up by the European Union, something which being in the UK has so far protected it from. The independence movement in Venice seems to be much shrewder in that regard. They want out of Italy, but also understand that it’s no good jumping out of the frying pan unless you can also get away from the fire. I very much endorse that, and if only the Scots were aware of the danger too I would support their bid for independence. However this does not mean that Venetian independence would lead to a definitive backlash against the New World Order. The Venetians have come a long way on the path to conspiratorial awareness, but still they have further to go. There’s still a lot of conflict within Venice about what kind of political model they will follow. Some want complete autonomy, other want to join with other regions in northern Italy and form a new federation. The north of Italy is much richer and more developed than the south, and it has a higher standard of living. The people there often feel resentful that they are subsidizing the south. The Mafia are also much more powerful in the south, especially on the island of Sicily. The north has also been the area with the most Third World immigration, and that has been a major political football. I’ve warned before many times about how there’s a controlled response to immigration being engineered in the UK, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/immigration-something-must-be-done.html. No doubt they will try to do the same in Italy. The authorities will have a problem-reaction-solution, divide-and-rule field day in the Venetian independence campaign unless the people get wise to it. What goes for Venice goes for everywhere else. The New World Order doesn’t just simply fight their enemy, they try their hardest to become it. Then they can turn their enemy into an ally. It’s happened again and again throughout all history and it’s time to put a stop to it.