In my recent review of the new film Disclosure Day, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2026/06/disclosure-day-film-review.html,
I did an analysis of the mainstream critics' pronouncements of Spielberg's
summer blockbuster. I deliberately avoided all reviews and interviews until
after I had seen the film so I could make up my own mind. When I read the
various movie columnists I saw that opinion was very divided. Then reviews
started coming in from the UFO community. This took a few days longer because, unlike
official journalists, we do not get invited to press previews. I was surprised,
and a bit dismayed, to find that generally the UFO-osphere regards the film much
less favourably than the mainstream media; and that is quite rare. I think a
lot of it was disappointment. Our hopes were so high for Disclosure Day and we were hyping it up to be some kind of miracle.
I myself tried to keep that instinct in check, and in my opinion it lived up to
my expectations. That wasn't the only reason though; I suspect the way many UFOlogists
have become more downhearted lately also contributed. (I'll avoid links to the
following because there would be too many.) I was not surprised to find that
the backslappers tended to be the ones who were most anti. They took their
usual cynical "It's all a grift!" line. The skeptics were, of course,
even more opposed. PZ Myers called it "mush-brained mystical bullshit
through and through." His video is called I saw Disclosure Day so you
don't have to. The thumbnail is the well-known image of Scanlon sitting in
the dive chair with his gum-shield and grimace and the words: "This is
what I looked like when I was watching Disclosure
Day." One thing I did not expect was the hostility from the ultra-woo
contingent; the believers in blue chickens, time travel and Antarctic temples
etc. They all hated it. I recall one lady, whom I will not name, being furious
at the idea of empathy towards the greys because she regards all greys as evil.
"If I see a grey I'll kick its arse!" she hissed. Not all aliens are
good guys by any means, but to make such a sweeping judgement of all greys is
totally false and ignorant. Another woman, somebody I know and usually like, also
took a very boorish line. She said she'd read a load of reviews and decided it
was a total psyop so she decided to avoid it. Why can't she make up her own
mind?
Condemnation is not universal though; Ross Coulthart, Dave
Hodrien Andrew McGrillen and Richard Dolan enjoyed it. I think those with a
more widespread interest, hopeful feelings about Disclosure and a more positive
attitude are suited for getting the most out of this film. There are exceptions
though. Surprisingly Bryce Zabel was not impressed; he felt it was not credible
and too much like an action movie. Darcy Weir had mixed feelings about it.
Steven Greenstreet astounded me. I assumed he would hate the film, but he
actually had a lot of positive words to add along with his predictable scorn. I
actually even agreed with some of his points. He said that the bad guys were
too incompetent, and that's true. See how easy it was for Daniel to steal one
of their cars and how they fell for the trick when he and Jane dumped it over
the cliff. Boyd couldn't shoot straight during the train scene even though the
range was almost point-blank. Why are Wardex such a threat to the truth coming
out when they are that amateurish? I found it interesting to read what my
fellow conspiratorial questers thought of Disclosure
Day. Would it surprise you? I think it did me... I have yet to find any
review from anybody as pro-DD as my
own.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2008/06/critics.html.
See here for more information: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2008/06/critics.html.

2 comments:
I'm not surprised by the divergent reviews because how you see the film will depend on what aspect of disclosure is important to you and how close the narrative is to what you really believe yourself already. What does surprise me is your own positive take on the film. It won't bring disclosure any closer and despite portraying many individually contentious but actually real phenomena, the broad picture it paints of how the world is governed is essentially false. The real Wardex is a breakaway civilisation funded by the missing trillions and there are no real counterparts to Fairchild, Kellner and Wakefield with powers conferred by ETs. Hollywood is an instrument of the illuminati and anything it produces that deals with such an important topic as this is ultimately going to serve their interests in one way or another.
This film is a psyop. It reinforces the trope that humans are essentially corrupt, sinful, fallen, hopeless, lacking empathy or whatever term you prefer to use, and in need of a saviour, in this case the Greys and their white hat abductees seemingly working with the approval of Jesus Christ. All agency is denied to humans themselves excepting a tiny number of special people. Just what the illuminati want. Let's not get involved or act for ourselves, the higher powers will ride to the rescue....except they won't.
MT, that is such an interesting comment. Next HPANWO Show next Thursday, the 25th, will be a breakdown of DD. Do you mind if I wait till then to give you a full response?
Post a Comment