Friday 13 September 2024

The Starmerlution Continues

 
A government term of office in the UK can be a maximum of five years. We have so far had just over two months of Keir Starmer's Labour regime and it already feels too long. Following his tyrannical oppression of the protests following the Stockport massacre, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2024/08/british-protest-livestream.html, he is wasting no more time. He has released thousands of prisoners early because of overcrowding in the system, but this is really because he wants to make space for a new class of political dissident; those who did anything as innocuous as merely cheer on the protesters. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3rdr092p9wo. This article claims only non-violent offenders are eligible for the scheme, or violent offenders with sentences of less than four years, but this has included a man who carried out a machete attack. Starmer did what every other prime minister has done, he blamed the problem on his predecessor. I've noted before the possible plans for internment centres, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/12/strange-new-prisons.html. The absurdity of "non-crime hate incident" reporting was abolished by a past home secretary, Priti Patel, but now Labour have reintroduced it. Many people are getting knocks on the door by the police for mean Tweets or even expressing an interest in the Anglo-Saxons. Source: https://odysee.com/@lotuseaters_com:1/this-video-could-get-you-arrested:9. (Interestingly and worryingly, the police continued to log NCHI's for a number of months after Patel's directive in violation of it. This could constitute a police mutiny, but no action was taken to stop them. I wonder why. Had some "higher authority" told them to hang in there?) Labour have long had their beady eyes on the House of Lords and now they are finally able to attack. They plan to sack the remaining ninety-two hereditary peers. This has been justified by appeals to "democracy!", as if Labour cared about that; after all the hereditary peers are aristocrats appointed by the King and unelected. However, the whole House is unelected anyway; all that will change is that elderly patriotic men raised with an ethos of noblesse oblige will be replaced by sycophantic Labour Party donors and obedient ex-cabinet ministers. House of Lords reform is nothing new; it's an ongoing process and Blair's New Labour did a lot of damage, but now it faces its worst danger ever; its abolition. Many on the left of Labour are keen for it to be replaced by an elected upper house, similar to Australia's Senate. Source: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/labour-house-of-lords-reform. This would leave the nation very vulnerable, to have career politicians running amuck with no calmer, slower, less selfish and more sensible master to rein them in. Remember it was the House of Lords that blocked the Online Harms Bill; which, needless to say, Labour plan to give a new reading. It was also Peter Baron Hill-Norton who made UFO's a government matter from the House of Lords. Labour used to have a reputation for being the "kind party" who served the interests of the poor and common folk, but that pretence has evaporated. They now plan to strip senior citizens winter fuel payments. This means that people above a certain age who cannot afford domestic heating bills will just have to suffer. These are people who often are not very mobile and who are therefore more at risk in cold temperatures. We are going to see deaths as a result of this, but as a character said in the comedy film Shrek: "some of you may die, but it is a sacrifice I am willing to make.", see: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/qQW7LzlwmzQ. In the ultimate pointless and purposeless vulgar exercise of power, Starmer plans to ban smoking in pub beer gardens, in the open air! Nigel Farage has rebelled by doing a pub crawl of as many premises as he can and lighting up in every one, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ogwa-WluIhc.
 
As appalling as these new proposals are, there's not a lot Parliament can do to stop them because Labour have a super-majority, a one-party state effectively. What will they do next? How can we possibly survive another four years and ten months of this? There's a saying that the Tories stab you in the back, while Labour stabs you in the front, so it could therefore be argued that we're now better off in a strange way. The banality of evil is now exposed for all to see, naked before creation. For something that has always depended on stealth and concealment it cannot continue. Something has to come out of left field, it always does; it's like a law of nature. It will probably be something unexpected, but we can make a few predictions. We know Labour have many internal divisions that have been cemented over while they were in opposition; but these cracks will now deepen and widen. There is left vs. right, the Corbynites against the Blair cronies; the radical Islamists who have been using Labour for their own purposes, and will now be confronted by the pro-Israel Jewish Labour movement. There are already fifty MP's who are going to vote against the fuel payment plan. Our country will also feel the influence from abroad where the political landscape is shifting in a more positive way. Populists are rising to power across continental Europe and Donald Trump is poised to retake the white House, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2024/07/trump-shooting-livestream.html. Somebody even forecast a situation where Britain might appear to foreigners like a kind of North Korea, a leftwing globalist holdout in an increasingly based world. So don't let the current crisis make you feel too downhearted. We may simply be witnessing the darkest hour before the dawn.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/01/donald-trump-portal.html.
And: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/10/brexit-portal.html.

2 comments:

Snarnok said...

Do you remember Matt Hancock's 2020/2021 strategy to get the elderly into the care homes, and what happened to them after that? This winter strategy seems to be part two of the same thing.

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Yes, it's almost as if these bureaucrats do NOT have the welfare of the elderly at heart.