Apollo Detectives 13

 

A film edited and produced by Neil Ward.
See here for the film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zM5hc5WZPFE.
This thirteenth Apollo Detectives film brings more new and original information that casts doubt over the official story of the first moon landings. This programme includes some field experiments by Neil and a presentation by Jarrah White with new information about the famous "C rock". Also a debate between Jarrah and an astronaut! Joining us on the panel are Scott Henderson and Robert Williams. See here for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/12/moon-landing-portal.html.
HPANWO Radio interview with Marcus Allen: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2022/12/programme-488-podcast-apollo-17.html.
See here for Neil's channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/neilgedd.
See here for Neil and Andy Chaplin's radio show: http://www.paukradio.com/shows-2/paranormal-peep-show/.
I have produced my own version of this film on HPANWO TV which includes my personal commentary: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2023/12/the-apollo-detectives-13-new-c-rock.html.

"The Truth is No Defence"

 

There is a new show on Richplanet TV about some new information regarding two of the supposed victims of the Manchester Arena bombing of 2017. This is all very interesting, but the most significant part of the programme, as well as disturbing, is the prologue. Richard D Hall reveals an update in his legal battle; see the background links for details. Richard continues to defend himself defiantly against the accusations of the plaintiffs who contest that Richard's publications about the incident in Manchester are a form of harassment. The obvious response from anybody in that situation is simply to plead fair comment. This is a common defence in a libel case, but the plaintiffs are applying to have all Richard's evidence excluded. If they have their way, the trial will proceed under the assumnption that the official story is true. Source: https://www.richplanet.net/richp_genre.php?ref=307&part=1. It reminds me of another similar trial, that of the researcher Ernst Zündel. Zündel was convicted several times in Canada of expressing opinions about a subject specifically prohibited by Canadian law. When he went to court he tried to defend himself by saying "Look, I can prove what I'm saying about this subject is true." He was not permitted to table this testimony in court or even subject it to an open debate. The judge did not dispute Zündel's assertions; he simply stated that the opinion was prohibted, regardless of whether it was true or false and so, to coin an infamous catchphrase: the truth is no defence. I understand why many people will find Zündel's views offensive, but surely you realize that if we allow the state to silence people for expressing a viewpoint because it offends us then we enter a very dark place indeed. Something similar happened when Ian R Crane tried to defend Tony Farrell at his police disciplinary. The boss said "You might be right, but it doesn't matter." Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mpGY7aR1oo. What kind of law is this where what is true or false doesn't matter!? How can Richard successfully defend himself in this case when the very basis of his reasons for publishing his material is struck from the record? Hopefully Richard will be able to prevent this application. I'm not a solicitor, but I would say his evidence is totally relevent because it concerns whether the Hibberts were actually there, which is central to their claim against him. I'm pleased to say that the community has rallied round Richard and stood up against this obvious injustice. Richard has raised most of the money he needs for his legal costs, but he will need as much as possible so please do send him some more if you can, see: https://www.richplanet.net/legal.php.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/07/rdh-lawsuit-mini-portal.html.

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Scum Media 2

 

I have been featured again in an interview with Nick Cotton, aka "Unwashed", of Scum Media, see: https://odysee.com/@UNWAShED:8/Ben2:b.
Subjects discussed include: a missing person case, the pitfalls of antifeminism, conspirasphere vs reactosphere and much much more.
See here for my previous interview with Nick: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/02/ben-emlyn-jones-and-unwashed.html.

A Gift For Ben- ALWAYS CARRY A TOWEL

 

The Crafty Nihilist, aka Mark and Liz Froud, have produced another video inspired by me: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5LEeKVFKz8.
This hillarious new music video is based on Meadows, my recent HPANWO TV reportage of the Stairway to the Stars conference, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2023/11/meadows.html.

See here for my previous appearance on the Crafty Nihilist's channel: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/08/crafty-nihilist-pre-glastonbury.html.

Crazy Plane Lady Update 2

 

Tiffany Gomas has once again broken her intermittent silence, this time in another exclusive interview with Inside Edition. This was carried out at her home in Grand Prairie, next to the airport where she had her experience. She tells the reporter that it was "the worst moment of my entire life." She didn't go out for four weeks because of feeling ashamed and embarrassed. She reveals that she was on her way to a family holiday in Florida when she flew into a rage. However the only other detail she provides is one we've already heard, that another passenger stole her wireless earbuds and she lost her temper. She then attempts to explain the strange things she said as nothing more than a "figure of speech". When asked about why she felt the aircraft was in danger she said it was simply as a result of her altercation and declined to elaborate because of "legal reasons". She says she loves to travel, but then it is revealed she has now been banned from American Airlines; one wonders why it took them this long. She seems keen to show the reporter around her voluminous house. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5q-usQJMQOM. The revelations in this very brief interview make no sense. They do not meet the necessary testimonial weight for what happened to her on that day in June. Her body language is shifty and evasive. She noticeably leans back, away from the reporter and the camera. Her hands in are in a typical defensive position, clasped in front of her crotch. I don't believe her story at all. What's more she seems to be using her marketing skills on herself right now with this new website in which she describes herself as a "viral personality", see: https://www.tiffanygomas.com. Clearly she understands the potential of social media infamy, but it still leaves us all in the dark about what she really saw on that plane.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/09/crazy-plane-lady-update.html.
And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2023/11/crazy-plane-lady.html.

Ben Emlyn-Jones on the Mercedez Lucke Benedict Show

 

I have been featured on the Mercedez Lucke-Benedict Show, see: https://www.spreaker.com/user/the_webb_network/ben-emilyn-jones.
Subjects discussed include: The late Kev Baker, fingerprinting children, reptilian humanoids and much much more.

Breaking News!- There is No Afterlife

 

Stop the press, guys. We have something really original in our hands!... Actually, we don't. Eternal post-mortem oblivion, the idea that the afterlife does not exist, has been a common belief since ancient times. The theory goes that a person's essence, in terms of their mind or soul, is a product of the brain. Probably as early as prehistoric ages people worked out that the brain is connected to thought, feeling and wakefulness. If somebody receives a head injury or illness it can cause them to black out, become confused or experience long-term mental impairment. According to an article somebody shared on social media, there is no way the afterlife can exist because there is no known mechanism in the laws of physics for it to do so. Even if somehow our consciousness existed in the quantum realm, it could not interact with the neurons in our brains while we are alive. It cites none other than that smiling Simeon of the small screen, Prof. Brian Cox himself. Source: https://www.higgypop.com/news/scientists-say-there-is-no-life-after-death/. However, another scientist, Sir Roger Penrose, proposes that the brain can do that because it has quantum computing abilities, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=43vuOpJY46s. Even if that turns out not to be true and the plausibility problem remains, the evidence gathered by many psychical researchers over a long period of time needs explaining, as I detail in the background portal link below. Many materialists argue that the concept of the afterlife is a cultural and psychological safety net generated by mortality salience, the knowledge of our own inevitable impending demise. They argue that afterlife delusions will arise inevitably in any human society, and indeed with any species that is intelligent enough to experience mortality salience; in fact there is evidence that elephants share it with us. They say that the afterlife is nothing more than wishful thinking. However, I have explained many times that the wishful thinking argument cuts both ways, for example: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/04/could-you-be-awarded-mba.html. It is impossible to prove that the afterlife exists; except waiting until it is our turn, of course. Despite this, the case for eternal post-mortem oblivion is also unproven. Its reality is dependent upon certain assumptions about brain function being true. This is an uncertainty we all have to live with and die with; although, as I detail in the portal below, I think we have good cause to be hopeful.
See here for background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2023/06/afterlife-portal.html.