Thursday, 30 April 2020

There's a Conspiracy Theorist under my Bed!

A number of prominent figures and organizations, such as Greater Manchester Police and the Prevent Strategy are warning the public about "radicalisation", especially online. This kind of warning has been spoken about openly for quite some time, ever since David Cameron's speech about "non-violent extremists", see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/10/alan-henning-killed.html. This time there is a specific link to the coronavirus crisis. The Manchester force said in a Tweet, now deleted: "Online platforms can be a fun world. Unfortunately, they can also be used to exploit vulnerable people. If you are worried that one of your friends or family is showing signs of radicalisation seek advice or call police on 101." They state that one of the signs of such radicalisation is in the question: "Are they repeating conspiracy theories?" Of course, this brings up the subsequent question of exactly what is a conspiracy theory; or it should. As I've said elsewhere, many pieces of perfectly normal and accepted viewpoints and historical facts are literally conspiracy theories, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/09/prof-karen-douglas-at-greenwich-sitp.html. However, I'm sure the police are referring here to its popular and erroneous definition, which needs no further explanation from me. This must surely concern a few people, even those who reject the claims made by conspiracy theorists. It is Orwellian Thoughtcrime by every definition of the word. A person is now a wrongdoer based not on any action they commit, but how they choose to think and speak. This must mean that certain viewpoints directly lead to criminal activities, according to this notion. Source: https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-police-conspiracy-theories/. The demonization of opinion has now spread to the coronavirus crisis, see: https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/political-leaders-warn-spreading-irresponsible-17954482. I actually do not agree with Kenneth Dobson, but I do not consider him a dangerous man for expressing his opinion. Obviously one of the most outspoken purveyors of conspiratorial matter on the internet is myself. Am I now a Thoughtcriminal? Surely readers who know me will understand the lunacy involved here... Wait a sec. Who's that knocking at my door?...

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hmmm the GMP??is Richard D Hall and the community as a whole getting too close in the investigation of the MEN bombing I wonder Ben... Mark Hollingsworth

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Hi Mark. I hadn't thought about that. Very possible. That bombing has been comprehensively exposed as a false flag by Richard and others. Remember how much disinfo and demonization there was over 9/11?