Sunday 14 March 2021

Sarah Everard- What's the Truth?

 
The kidnapping and murder of Sarah Everard, a young marketing executive from London, has shocked the nation. I badly want to see justice done and her loved ones have my deepest condolences. Sarah disappeared on the evening of the third of March while walking home across Clapham Common. Posters were put up all over the city as her family and friends desperately tried to find her. Her body was found in Ashford, Kent last Wednesday. By then a suspect had already been arrested on suspicion of kidnapping, Wayne Couzens. As always when an atrocity like this happens, it is immediately exploited by feminists for their own agenda. The MP Jess "I wouldn't even vote for you" Phillips made a speech in Parliament where she read out the name of every woman... or should I say "Woman!" in which the convict, or even the person charged, was a man. Feminism messes with people's heads so badly that thousands of women turned up for what had been called a "tribute" to Sarah Everard on Clapham Common, but instead degenerated into an Orwellian Hate Week. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56389824. Sarah's murder is being portrayed as just one part of a much bigger problem, something organized and systemic. Men (only white men of course!) are deliberately killing women all the time, as part of a conspiracy to preserve the "White Male Patriarchy!", and the state grants them permission to do so. A member of the House of Lords yesterday called for a curfew on men in an ironic way, but this was picked up and taken seriously by many other politicians. As always, we can depend on Sargon of Akkad to deconstruct this evil and dangerous nonsense, see: https://www.bitchute.com/video/v57zPxuI7XI/.
 
This malicious hoax by feminists does need to be exposed for what it is, but there is a much more serious conundrum that has been brought up by this horrific crime. The suspect, Wayne Couzens, was a police officer, but not just any beat policeman; he was a member of an elite unit, the PaDP- Parliamentary and Diplomatic Protection squad. Their duties are: "Protection of government-owned buildings and embassies; residential protection for high-profile ministers, visiting heads of state, heads of government and foreign ministers; searching and access control of visitors and vehicles to New Scotland Yard and Downing Street; and assisting with protection at buildings such as the Palace of Westminster." The officers are all firearms trained and are routinely armed. Also there is another fact connected to the case which has not been widely publicized; partly, of course, because it contradicts the feminist narrative, but also because it could reveal that there is far more going on connected to this murder: a second person, a female, was arrested at Couzens' address and is under suspicion of assisting an offender. This is an early speculation, but it's important to ask this question: Could Sarah Everard's murder be a "procurement gone wrong"? Survivors from inside government secret programmes often independently give details of senior figures in the elite who abuse or even kill ordinary people for pleasure. The best known of these is Cathy O'Brien who accuses over a hundred and fifty people of crimes like rape, torture, kidnapping and murder. Among those she names are Bill and Hillary Clinton; Brian Mulroney, prime minister of Canada; and George HW Bush. None of these people have ever sued and her books are still in print. Very often the elitists are said to employ members of their own security detail to carry out this gruesome extra duty. They capture the kind of person the elitist wants; usually it is a child, but sometimes it is a teenager or adult. The same employee then disposes of the body afterwards and covers up the crime via their influence in the media and police forces. The downside for anybody who agrees to such a malevolent mission is that if anything goes wrong during the procurement process, they take all the rap. It could be that this has just happened to Wayne Couzens. For whatever reason, the operation to deliver Sarah Everard to whoever "ordered" her was bungled, the secrecy was blown and now the person doing it is being portrayed in the media as a random thrill-killer who took Sarah's life for his own sickening reasons. If somebody "ordered" Sarah then they will remain safe from public scrutiny. I don't know if what I've just speculated on is true, but there's enough reason to suggest it. If such acts of monstrosity are going on then they need to be stopped, so I make no apologies for anything I have said in post.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2021/01/programme-403-podcast-ammanford-mystery.html.
And: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2019/07/programme-330-podcast-child-abuse-update.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/10/rape-axe.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/07/child-slavery-on-mars.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/08/jeffrey-epstein-death-portal.html.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Ben, I have to say when I first heard about this story I immediately thought this is a staged/faked story, possibly used as a distraction. I still remain of that view and I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks this. I wonder what Richard D Hall will make of this as he often comes from the viewpoint that these stories are just a pysop.

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

I was actually thinking of him when I came up with this possibility. He's probably thought of it too independently because it's similar to the fake story of Jo Cox and Thomas Mare.

Anonymous said...

Yeah I think Richard D Hall now believes that Tommy Mair was a willing participant in the faked murder of Jo Cox rather than Mair being an unwitting bystander who was wrongly accused of her death because he had been used as a patsy, I think that's what Hall was meaning. Makes you wonder what other past shootings/murders are actually hoaxes as opposed to the typical conspiratorial view that they are the result of mind controlled patsy's. As for Sarah Everard, the whole story smells of a complete hoax, probably Sarah herself never even existed or was already died.

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

It's possible I suppose. Why would they do that? As for Tommy Mair, I think Richard has all but proven his case. The Jo Cox "death" is as fake as a three bob bit. His docu is excellent. I laughed my head off when that stupid MP unwittingly advertised it on BBC Question Time.