I can't remember who recommended me the film
Skullduggery,
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0066384/,
but they said it would suit me. The subject matter does, but it was very badly
executed. I don't know if this is a pattern, but it is based on a French novel,
like
Planet of the Apes, another
clanger. Do French novels always adapt into bad English movies? The lead is
played by Burt Reynolds, normally one of my favourite actors. I know him
primarily for his series of outstanding comedy road movies directed by Hal
Needham such as
Cannonball Run and
Smokey and the Bandit. His character in
this film really makes no sense. Well, it seems to split into two halfway
through the film. He is, on the one hand, a classic 60's alpha male;
conventionally good-looking, pragmatic, single-minded and materialistic. He and
his friend have a plan to make their fortune mining a mineral in Papua New
Guinea for use in making televisions; a reference to third world commodity
exploitation in the western luxury goods industry. Indeed,
Skullduggery tries in vain to become an early form of eco-fiction;
a proto-
Avatar. This falls flat on
its face because of the failure to make Reynolds' character credible. It's
almost inevitable that he would end up in the love interest subplot, a must for
all films of that era; but his relationship with the leading lady, played by
Susan Clark, is bootstrapped very badly into the narrative. They seem poorly
matched as a couple with zero chemistry. She plays a scientist studying the
"Tropies", a species of cryptid primate living in the middle of the
island's dense forest. Reynolds and his mate decide to use Tropi slaves on
their mining operation as unpaid labour. For a while it looks like the story is
blending with my own novel
Rockall,
see:
https://hpanwo-bb.blogspot.com/2009/02/rockall-chapter-1.html.
So where is the Dill Gibson? The answer is almost unbelievable; Reynolds'
character becomes the Dill Gibson. It appears even the film makers themselves
seem to realize how inadequate their composition is because in one scene
Clark
says to Reynolds "I never knew you were the bleeding heart type." Nor
did anybody else, especially this viewer. There is no process or development
explaining Reynolds' transformation. Ideally that role should have been the
domain of another character, but no such character was ever written. So when
Reynolds decides on the spot that he is no longer the hard-headed entrepreneur
and is instead a crusading humanitarian conservationist, he ends up in court
accused of murder when one of the Tropies dies. The essence of the trial is
whether the Tropies are human or not. This could have been a profound
storyline, exploring what it means to be human in a deep spiritual sense, but
instead it all came down to whether they were fertile with humans and whether
they had a spoken language etc. What a missed opportunity
Skullduggery is. The title is also very odd; and it's spelled differently
from the similar word "skulduggery". I'm not sure why it was chosen,
possibly because skulls appear a lot in the film.
(Apologies for the current lack of activity on HPANWO Voice.
I've not had time to update it.)