Thursday, 3 September 2015

Protect Stone Mountain

Stone Mountain is a popular beauty spot in Georgia USA; a granite plateau that looms above lush parkland. Carved onto the side of the rocky peak is a magnificent bas-relief, the largest in the world. The sculpture was created in several phases between 1916 and 1972 and depicts three Confederate heroes from the Civil War, the Confederacy's President, Jefferson Davis, Gen. Robert E. Lee and Gen. Thomas J. Stonewall Jackson. The three men are depicted riding along on horseback, their hats held proudly over their hearts. Following the debate over the flying of the Confederate battle flag, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/keep-flag-up.html, an online petition was started to remove the Confederate flags flying at the entrance to Stone Mountain Park area. The organizer, Shannon Byrne, said: "It's such an insult to the diversity of people that come to visit the mountain!" A black rambler told a news crew: "It offends me on many levels. The first being what it stood for and what the KKK would wave when they hung my ancestors on trees.", see: http://www.wsbtv.com/news/news/local/debate-brewing-over-stone-mountain-parks-confedera/nmnWd/. It's true that a major Ku Klux Klan rally took place at the mountain in 1915. At the end of the news report, almost as an afterthought or disclaimer, the reporter states that under Georgian law, the Stone Mountain sculpture itself is protected... but for how much longer? The drive to erase the history of the old South has so far gone beyond just the flag. There are calls to destroy statues of Southern figures from the Civil War, cemeteries have been desecrated and Confederate soldiers' gravestones vandalized. There is a true Year Zero fervour about these crimes that it's fair to say is not unlike ISIS in the Middle East destroying ancient monuments. How long will it be before the call goes out to dynamite the Stone Mountain sculpture?

Recently I sent an interview request to somebody to appear on HPANWO Radio on an unrelated matter and he replied to say: "Thank you for inviting me to be on your radio show. However, I am hoping to convince you to change your mind about one of your recent posts concerning the Confederate flag issue in the USA. The Confederate flag had only one true purpose in our nation, to divide and conquer based on the evil of slavery. The flag stands for treason and destruction of the nation. The flag was used to oppress the African Americans well into the 1960's regarding segregation and white supremacy. It has no real cultural significance other than insensitivity to the horrors experienced by ancestors of the freed slaves. This country has big race problems right now, and these symbols, flags, statues, monuments etc are symbols of oppression to a great portion of our society. The removal of the flag issue is concerned with banning the flag from public property, government property and grounds. Those who oppose it should not have to pay for its maintenance with their hard earned money. It is insensitive for government bodies to fly it. Private persons have the right, but having the flag on tax payer maintained public property is wrong. If I can convince you of this being the more enlightened position, I would be happy to appear on your show. Otherwise, I'm afraid I will have to decline. If you remove your support for the confederate flag, I will be happy to appear on your show. I think from what I have seen of your work, you are trying to enlighten as well. I hope we can get on the same page on this issue. Warm Regards." This man is one of those calling for the removal of statues of Albert Pike, a southern Civil War general and freemason. It's true Albert Pike was a deeply unpleasant person who was a racist... a real racist for a change, and who clearly knew about the New World Order, so I can genuinely understand his discomfort with the statues of Pike; but once you start erasing the past, where do you stop? There are no sunset clauses on any of these policies; no specific goals or intentions. Could I soon be called "racist!" for drinking a glass of Southern Comfort? Is that really all there is to the South? Was the Confederacy really just a massive concentration camp full of wailing black slaves lying chained up on the ground, while heterosexual white males carrying whips strutted among their prostrate and defenceless bodies cackling demonically? There is something very pernicious about this campaign; although I think my contact means well and truly believes it is the right thing to do. I had a civil and respectful email conversation with my contact, but he did not persuade me to change my mind over the flag, so the interview will not be taking place; that's a shame, but I'm not going to lie; I'm not going to use hypocrisy to get a scoop. As I've said many times, I'm tired of white straight males being constantly regarded as evil. Even though the Klan used to fly the Confederate flag, this doesn't make it invariably a symbol of white supremacy and hatred of black people. It is seen by many, including me, as a symbol of white identity, but what's wrong with that? Every other group is allowed an identity; why are white straight male people not? Also, as I say in my article on the flag, it is a cultural icon of the Deep South, everything to do with that region of the world, from iced tea to river boats. I think this is all cultural Marxism, an Orwellian mind control attack intended to psychologically imprison all people, not just WSM, but of every ethnic group, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/jason-wilson-on-cultural-marxism.html. As I say in my article linked above about the Confederate flag, this new political movement to eliminate the vestiges of the Confederacy is hypocritical, defamatory and deceitful. I am seriously concerned that before long it will indeed turn its malicious eye on the beautiful work of art that is the Stone Mountain sculpture. Forewarned is forearmed; hopefully I will not one day have to write a follow-up article to this one entitled Save Stone Mountain.

Wednesday, 2 September 2015

Psychic Detectives Legitimized

New guidelines for police officers have been published stating officially that there is nothing wrong with detectives employing mediums, clairvoyants, psychics and witches to aid them in criminal investigations. This is something that many officers do anyway on an informal level, but this new document from the College of Policing is the first one that officially acknowledges the tactic. It even goes as far as to recommend that officers do not rule out the use of crystal balls and cauldrons either, and says police officers should judge them "in the context of the case". However the text does warn officers against these methods becoming a distraction. This is not certified recognition that psychic detectives have genuine supernatural powers per se; that really would be too much to ask. It leaves open the possibility that the alleged psychic might have gained their information through normal means, in which case officers should not dismiss it because of the source; but it does not specifically state either that psychic powers are unreal. What's more there are many cases of policemen using mediums and clairvoyants to solve crimes in the belief that they have real extra-sensory perception. Despite a few famous blunders, like Sylvia Browne's search for the missing boy Shawn Hornbeck in which she told the parents incorrectly on live TV that he was dead, four years before he turned up alive and well, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/sylvia-browne-dies.html, many officers have a lot of confidence in their telepathic comrades' abilities. For some reason Australia seems to be the country most open to this concept with multiple successful outcomes. For example in Sydney in 1996 a clairvoyant called Phillipe Durant was brought in to help search for a missing woman called Paula Brown. Using remote viewing and dowsing techniques, Durant led police to a spot and the body of the woman was found there, see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3216727/Ello-ello-ello-anybody-New-guidelines-say-police-not-rule-tip-offs-psychics-witches-clairvoyants.html. Policemen who use psychic detectives to help them say something very important about the philosophy of science, and this is very relevant to the Skeptic movement. Policing is a profession which is fundamentally based on science, rationality, logic and evidence, like almost no other. Therefore if an officer tales advice from a psychic investigator then they do so for one reason alone- because it works. A Skeptic would never use a psychic detective, in fact Oxford Skeptics in the Pub used to be run by a policeman who spoke out against them, see: http://oxford.skepticsinthepub.org/. It is therefore very obvious that an aversion to psychic detectives is purely one of principle, not one of practicalities. This is despite the fact that the police embody the slogans of the Skeptics more than anybody else. Such in essence, is the difference between Skeptics with a K and sceptics with a c.

Tuesday, 1 September 2015

Football Thoughtcrime

Football is a sport in which controversy is daily business, however several incidents have stood out from the everyday shenanigans as worthy of HPANWO-esque note. Here's one that I reported on a while ago: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/is-luis-suarez-zombie.html; another happened several years earlier, but it has never been justly resolved. Paolo Di Canio was one of the world's top football players; originally signed up with Lazio in 1985 he appeared for ten other clubs across Europe and also his national team, Italy. Like many characters in the beautiful game, he has a hot-headed personality and a short temper, but he was renowned for his skill, daring and endurance on the pitch. Also traditionally for a footballer, he became a team manager after the end of his on-pitch career, however it was in March 2013 when he was shortlisted to coach Sunderland that a new and very unusual dispute broke out. Di Canio had previously published an autobiographical book in which he expressed his admiration for Benito Mussolini. Mussolini is an almost unknown historical figure outside his native Italy, but is one of the country's most prominent political movers. He ruled as a one-party dictator of the country from 1925 until his ousting and assassination in 1945. He was known as Il Duce, "the leader". Italy as a single nation is comparatively a very new one, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/freedom-for-venice.html, and Mussolini wanted to consolidate it into an aggressive and nationalistic new form that employed many of the two thousand year old vestiges of the Roman Empire. Italy under his leadership was tightly controlled and the media was completely hooked to his propaganda. He made life hard for many people and sometimes violently crushed his political enemies. His regime was destroyed by the Allied invasion of Italy in the endgame of World War II. He was captured by communist rebels who killed him and hung his body upside down on the forecourt of an Esso garage in Milan. Paolo Di Canio describes Benito Mussolini as "basically a very principled and ethical individual... He has been deeply misunderstood by history." Di Canio also used to give a Roman victory salute during his Lazio days when he scored a goal, just like Mussolini used to. He received a fine and one-match ban for that. Ironically Mussolini himself had been a die-hard Lazio supporter. The problem is that Benito Mussolini was a "fascist". I put that word in quotes because it's very hard to define and is normally just used as a term of abuse. I myself have been called a "fascist" a few times, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/marine-le-pen-at-oxford-union.html. It is basically a generic dysphemism for anybody political left-wingers don't like, for whatever reason. You'll normally hear it pronounced "fathitht!" and have it spat at you by some scruffy, malodourous student carrying a placard. This happened to David Icke when he went to Canada, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/david-icke-loses-lawsuit.html. I would never describe myself as a "fascist!", whatever you think the word means, and feel offended by the people who call me that.

The response to Paolo Di Canio's appointment to the Sunderland bench was outrage. Several trade unions pulled out of their sponsorship deals and had their placards removed from the Stadium of Light, the club's ground (The GMB was one of them, which could mean that they might not be an effective alternative to UNISON for striking hospital porters after all, see: http://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/jr-porters-strike-update-2.html) The Durham Miners Association also disaffiliated from the club. The vice-chairman resigned immediately; this was David Miliband, brother of the Labour Party Fabian Boy Wonder Ed Miliband. Some Sunderland fans set up a Facebook group with four thousand members accusing him of racism and demanding his immediate dismissal. This is despite the fact that his bad behaviour has so far been exclusively of the usual football stars' kind; there is not one reported complaint of any racist behaviour made by any player, fellow manager or fan against Di Canio. Therefore his is completely and totally a thoughtcrime in every sense of the word. He is being persecuted for having a particular opinion; that's all. This makes him somewhat similar to me because when I was dismissed from hospital portering I was told that I held views that "called into question my ability to perform my duties without prejudice." This was alleged to be racism because of my Microchip a Muslim Day video which is actually a comedy satire about propaganda related to the agenda by the state to insert electronic implants into people, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2010/09/microchip-muslim-day.html. What's more, like Di Canio, I had never had any trouble performing my duties without prejudice in the previous twenty-three years I'd been portering at the hospital. I'm actually very opposed to racism of any kind, and I've never behaved in such a way to anybody in the NHS workforce, which is famous for being highly cosmopolitan, see here for more details: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/how-i-became-ex-hospital-porter.html. We're entering a dangerous age if somebody can be persecuted in the workplace because of beliefs they think of, regardless of whether or not they act on those beliefs. The way Di Canio was spoken about in the media was very worrying; there was little difference in tone between the actual reports and the ones that might have been written if he had in fact racially abused a black or Jewish player etc, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiDxtnY2bF0. Paolo Di Canio and I are not alone in that respect. In 2014 a witch-hunt was organized against Brendan Eich, the CEO of Mozilla. Eich is one of the pioneers of the modern computer age; he invented JavaScript, the programming language that allows you to read these words on this webpage. Despite his lofty and revered position in the electronics industry and the history of information technology, his career was ruined instantly and without mercy. Why? Because he donated $US 1000 six years previously to a campaign group opposing gay marriage, see: http://abcnews.go.com/Business/mozilla-ceo-resigns-calif-gay-marriage-ban-campaign/story?id=23181711. This money was donated from his private purse, not from the company's money, and he did it in his own time. Also he never exhibited any misconduct in the workplace towards homosexual staff members. However that didn't matter and he was destroyed overnight. This is why I've become an opponent of Peter Tatchell, a former colleague of mine on The People's Voice; this is despite the fact that I agree with him over gay marriage. I don't know specifically, but I suspect that he would support the sacking of Brendan Eich, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/gay-marriage-usa.html. Andy Nowicki is another good example, see background article at the bottom. I don't know Paolo Di Canio; I've never met him, but if I did I'd ask him to elaborate on what he said. If Benito Mussolini is misunderstood by history, then in what way? I bet that most of the people who attacked Di Canio don't know anything about Mussolini except that he's a "fascist!" and therefore an "evil person!". Shouldn't Di Canio's statement instead be a trigger for intellectual discourse that might make us think again? One of the definitions of fascism is that it was an international political movement that doesn't exist anywhere in the world today; it rose and fell in the first half of the 20th century. It was set up as an attempt to halt the spread of communism across Europe following the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Unlike his wartime ally Adolf Hitler, Mussolini did not blame everything on the Jews, and until 1938 Jews were not prohibited from appointments to public office in Italy. What's more the ban was only due to the influence of some of his ministers and the need for German support as war approached. He also improved the Italian economy enormously, opening state-run farms and factories all over the new nation. He created millions of jobs, and built roads and railways across the land. Also, amazingly, he was the first government leader to establish an official UFO investigation agency, decades before Nick Pope's MoD UFO desk (Good 2006). I'm not saying that Mussolini was a good man, or a bad man. I'm just saying that there are different ways of looking at history; and history has a habit of creating fictional angels and demons out of perfectly ordinary mortal people; people with the same human virtues and flaws as everybody else. However, we, the people are not permitted to think more than one-dimensionally in today's world. Despite all the pressure to reject him, Paolo Di Canio was signed up for a two-season contact at Sunderland; the club bravely resisted the edicts from the Ministry of Truth. However he was sacked after just a couple of months. This was not due to him being "Nazi fascist scum!", but because the team only won three games out of the thirteen they played under his management.
See here for more information: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/08/political-correctness-portal.html.

Friday, 28 August 2015

Ben Emlyn-Jones at High Wycombe Paranormal

I will be speaking at the High Wycombe Paranormal Meet-Up group on Wednesday the 30th of September. The event starts around 7.30 PM and the venue is the Bricklayers Arms, High Street, Downley, High Wycombe, HP13 5XJ. Just £3 entry. See here for more details; you'll need to log into a Facebook account: https://www.facebook.com/groups/415462125205125/.
My lecture will be entitled Zombies- Fact of Fiction? Zombies are well-known figures of mythology and horror fiction, and their profile is steadily increasing in recent books and films. However more and more they have been appearing in the media and in official government publications portrayed as real or semi-real. What's going on? Includes recent updates. This lecture contains disturbing information and is not suitable for small children.
See here for a film of my previous appearance at High Wycombe Paranormal: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/04/ben-emlyn-jones-on-energy-politics-and.html.

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

Mystery Soda Machine

Seattle is a large harbour city that sits on the coast of the Pacific northwest of the United States of America. Outwardly it's a normal American metropolis; but for some reason Seattle, and the area around it, has a very esoteric reputation that I've had to deal with more then once before, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/mysterious-object-in-seattle-tunnel-dig.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/dr-jonathan-reed-at-rendlesham-forest.html. The enigma I'm going to discuss today is ostensibly very ordinary; in fact it's the sort of thing you would probably walk past and not give a second look if you didn't know better. Believe it or not, it centres around a soft drinks dispenser; what Americans call a "soda machine". Like many occultist phenomena it can be found at a crossroads, in this case the junction of East John Street and 10th Avenue East in the Capitol Hill district of downtown Seattle. It is an aged and rather weather-beaten machine with the paint scraped off both sides; some rust and graffiti has been substituted. The design of the machine is similar to ones soft drinks corporations manufactured in the 1970's; however it is not an exact model and appears to have been custom-made by persons or organizations unknown. Unlike modern drinks vending machines, the selection buttons are at eye-level instead of at the side. It still works perfectly despite the fact that nobody ever seems to repair it. This is remarkable because automated drinks dispensers are quite complex from an engineering perspective and they require a lot of maintenance. The stock is stored in a refrigerated compartment and the electronics and mechanics have to process the money and then smoothly and quickly transport the correct product from that compartment to the delivery chute without getting it jammed or handing out the wrong item. The oblong plastic selection buttons are labelled for Coca Cola, Pepsi Cola, Barq's Root Beer (a product of the Coca Cola company) and Mountain Dew. The motifs of the drinks are all of 1970's vintage. All products cost ¢US 75, the equivalent of 48 pence; this is extremely cheap. Whoever... or whatever... manages the machine, they have only ever once adjusted their prices to take account of changing currency values, up from a giveaway ¢US 55 per can, about 34p. Assuming that they purchase their stock through the normal channels, they must run their outlet at a considerable loss. Interestingly there are two extra buttons on the machine both labelled "?MYSTERY" (sic) in a circus signboard-like font on a yellow background. If you insert your money and press that, all kinds of strange things are alleged to happen. The machine is said to read minds, so if you think about the beverage you want while pressing the "?MYSTERY"  button, it will give you your choice. Another report said that after spending five dollars in the machine, it dispensed a product that is not one from its normal menu. The machine can apparently provide up to six different extra brands of soft drink, some that are not even manufactured nowadays. If so I hope whoever got them kept the empty cans afterwards, because they'll be a vital piece of evidence. Nobody knows who owns the mystery soda machine, or who put it there. Also no one seems to remember when the machine first appeared in the neighbourhood although specific records of its presence date back to 1999. It stands outside the offices of Broadway Locksmiths Ltd and many researchers have made enquiries there. The staff say that nobody has ever been seen refilling the machine or taking away the money. Despite this it never runs out of any drink and its moneybox is never full. It has no known established electricity supply, which is very odd considering machines like those include a powerful refrigeration system. The manager of Broadway Locksmiths assumes the machine is on the office's mains, but they are never changed for it on their electric bill. It has a reputation in the local area as a source of fear as well as curiosity. Some people find it creepy and cross the road to avoid it, see: http://www.atlasobscura.com/places/mystery-soda-machine.

The Mystery Soda Machine has become a fairly popular novelty and alternative tourist attraction, and many people who take a trip to Seattle pay a visit to the machine to try the Mystery button and see what pops out. They have their photos taken beside it and even film themselves using it, see: http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dce_1396106908. There are several travel articles and rough guides which mention the machine and speculate as to its nature. The notion of it being paranormal in some way does come up. Others just assume that the shadowy soft drinks dispenser is tended late at night by people in dark overalls and balaclavas driving a black van full of cans in the back. This may well be true, but I take the supernatural theory seriously. It is possible that the Mystery Soda Machine is some kind of hyperdimensional intrusion. In this way it is similar to Rosslyn Chapel in Scotland. My friend and fellow researcher Brian Allan has investigated Rosslyn thoroughly and concluded that it exists only partly in our world; one part of it sticks outside our universe on a fourth dimensional level, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/programme-10-podcast-brian-allan.html. If what I've said doesn't make any sense to you then I recommend the book Flatland by Edwin Abbott. I guarantee it will completely clarify the matter; I review it here: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/09/flatland.html. (Here is a link to the public domain online edition; the author died in 1926 so his copyright expired in 1996, see: http://www.geom.uiuc.edu/~banchoff/Flatland/.) If the reports about it are true then the machine may well be similar to Rosslyn Chapel; in this way the rules of causality and reality inside the machine may be very different to what we'd normally expect. This could be why it never runs out of stock no matter how many drinks customers order. This is why it doesn't need refilling. This is why it can sell products at such cheap prices that they would bankrupt any other retailer. These kinds of seemingly impossible effects are more common than you might think; in fact if you could walk by Seattle's magic drinks machine maybe you walk past similar phenomena all the time and never know it. Indeed you may suddenly find strange objects falling from the sky like rain and wonder how on Earth could that happen. Events like this do occur regularly and I suspect are related to things like the machine, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/out-of-blue.html. There's also the strange case of the "interdimensional vortex" opening up in Brighton, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/stargate-brighton.html. There may even be a link to the esoteric computer game Polybius, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/polybius.html. The background links below contain more information on this area of research. If one accepts the reality of parallel universes and the possibility that different universal "membranes" can come into contact and bleed over into each other; then one must also ask, as I have done many times, if some individuals might be trying to access other universes deliberately via occult rituals, heavy industrial scientific methods, or even a mixture of the two. I suspect that the Large Hadron Collider at CERN could be one of these attempts, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/cern-progress-or-apocalypse.html. The quandary of the mystery soda machine has inspired a local Seattle film maker, Marcy Stone-Francois to make this short movie as part of her college course, see: https://vimeo.com/51843238.
The skeptics will of course respond that everything I've written above is nonsense and that there's a "rational explanation" for all the anomalies of the machine. But an explanation can never be rational, only a method can. I think I've explored possibilities based on what I know, not made any firm conclusions, using a perfectly rational methodology. So when this photograph came to my attention I studied it carefully, see: http://www.capitolhillseattle.com/2014/05/spoiler-alert-mystery-of-the-capitol-hill-mystery-coke-machines-mysteries-revealed/bmloxcncyaasyvh-1/. This drive-by snap shows a man and a woman standing by what appears to be the Mystery Soda Machine with its door open. Inside you can clearly see what looks to be the completely normal interior of a drinks dispenser, the kind you see if you looked into any of them while the maintenance man is paying a visit. However, one mistake the skeptics often make is that they fail to understand that a "rational explanation" is a claim too. There are many examples of false-debunking operations that the skeppers have accepted without question simply because they are debunking operations, for example see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1lDF-NAOraQ. That means we must not be too swift to accept that photo as evidence without subjecting it to the same scrutiny that we would, say, a ghost image or piece of UFO footage. We must admit that it could just as easily have been Photoshopped. Seattle is named after a famous Red Indian chief who in 1855 wrote a letter that reveals explicitly the difference in psychology and culture between Illuminati-occupied lands and those beyond it, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2007/11/chief-seattles-letter.html. If the Seattle region really is a portal area where our world blends with others, then it's no surprise that some of the modern residents and visitors are oblivious to it and in denial. If we can break out of our modern blinkered stupor then a haunted vending machine for carbonated fruit juice-based drinks will appear run-of-the-mill compared to what else we'll become aware of.

Tuesday, 18 August 2015

Peter Robbins on the EDX Files

The controversy over Col. Charles Halt's recent conference at Rendlesham Forest continues. The good news is that YouTube have finally accepted that I have not broken copyright law and have restored my HPANWO TV reportage, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/colonel-halt-returns-to-rendlesham.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/ben-emlyn-jones-is-innocent.html. However, Col. Halt still has to be taken to task for the personal comments he made at the event about his fellow UFO witness Larry Warren. The EDX Files on East Dunbartonshire Radio does so. They also correct what they believe are factual errors in what Halt said. The presenter is the author and researcher Alyson Dunlop and she interviews my good friend Peter Robbins, co-author with Larry of Left at East Gate.
See here for Alyson's website: http://alysondunlop.com/. Left at East Gate can be purchased here: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Left-East-Gate-Bentwater-Woodbridge-Investigation/dp/1854792318.

Monday, 17 August 2015

UFO Sighting by Trevor Murray

UFO encounters happen all the time, as I have always said. Millions of people have seen them; a sighting will probably have taken place during the time it takes you to read this article. I've seen them myself. I've seen things in the sky maybe a dozen times or more that I can't explain. A couple of those stand out as truly inexplicable, for instance see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/post-bilderberg.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/my-ufo-sighting.html. However there are other far more spectacular sightings happening now and again; it was only a matter of time before one happened to somebody I know. Trevor Murray is a fellow panellist of mine from the round table talk radio show I do, The Mind Set Podcast. He's also a serving hospital porter so we have a lot in common. In the most recent programme he relates his UFO experience, from 12.00 to 31.44, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/ben-emlyn-jones-on-mind-set-podcast-93.html. (The picture above is not an illustration of his report.) It took place at Trevor's home in Calgary in Alberta, Canada on the evening of the 9th of August. It was 11 PM; Trevor and his wife were in the back garden when they saw a single light moving overhead in a straight line at a steady speed. They first thought it was a satellite or the International Space Station, but then it made a right angle turn and sped up. Then about ten minutes later a structured object appeared to the northwest quite low in the sky. Trevor describes it as being round like a "dimmer light" and was an estimated 1,600 feet away; but ranging objects in the sky is not easy, therefore so is judging their size. The lighting of the object rose and then faded away in about six seconds. It was blue white in colour and very bright. In a way these are two separate sightings, but they happened so close together in time and space that it's reasonable to assume they were connected. If you go online you'll find there has indeed been quite a lot of strange apparitions in the sky recently in that area, see: http://ufoplanet.4u2ctv.com/tag/calgary/. Whether this is related to the recent Disclosure Canada conference tour is a matter of conjecture, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6I9ksoN7bA. Canada is a major centre for UFO awareness thanks to people like Wilbert Smith and Paul Hellyer, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/who-is-wilbert-smith.html and: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/hellyer-checks-evidence.html. Trevor and his wife were quite alarmed by what they'd seen and during the night they were afraid that their two-year old daughter might be abducted by the aliens. These feelings add a lot of credibility to his story in my view. What Trevor experienced in UFOlogical terms was a close encounter, something I've never had myself. On the Hynek scale his would be classified as a "close encounter of the first kind" This is defined as "Visual sightings of an unidentified flying object seemingly less than five hundred feet away that show an appreciable angular extension and considerable detail". Trevor's estimate of distance is slightly further than that limit, but, as I said, it's difficult to range objects in the sky so it would be pedantic to say that for this reason his sighting was not a CE1, see: http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/C/closeencounters.html. I can't think of any explanation for my brother porter's sighting, even taking the two phases of it separately. Together this makes a highly unusual and interesting case. The fact that there were two independent witnesses also makes it significant. I have recommended to Trevor and his wife that they ask their neighbours if they saw anything, and to report it at one of the many organizations that run such a service, for example MUFON- the Mutual UFO Network, see: http://www.mufon.com/report-a-ufo1.html or Richplanet, see: http://www.richplanet.net/report.php.