Wednesday, 11 November 2015

Pyramid Thermal Mystery

Scientists carrying out a new survey of the Egyptian pyramids have made an unexpected discovery. The unimaginatively named "Operation Scan Pyramids" began on the 25th of October and will take more than a year. The study will attempt to detect radiation emitted from the ancient monuments on the Giza plateau in Egypt, including that at the infrared wavelength range which indicates a heat source. They have already published some of their perplexing results. Three constituent blocks at the base of the Great Pyramid, or the Pyramid of Khufu, are considerably warmer than those surrounding them. This could be due to the presence of different building materials or air currents within the structure, but it could indicate the existence of a void inside the monument. Source: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/mystery-heat-spots-found-in-pyramids/ar-CCaWwK?ocid=twmsn. This is extremely interesting because it has long been speculated that the known passageways and chambers within the Pyramid are not the only ones. The pyramids of Egypt have been broken into several times during their four-and-a-half millennia history, mostly in the hope of finding golden jewels like those in King Tutankhamen's tomb in the Valley of the Kings. There are a number of rooms within the building given names such as the "King's Chamber", "Queen's Chamber", "Antechamber", "Grand Gallery" and the "Abyss". These are connected by corridors that are clearly intended for people to walk along, although some areas were sealed by stone blocks and had to be broken up to allow access. The latest of these closed routes was discovered in 1872 by the Scottish archaeologist and engineer Waynman Dixon. Dixon used a hammer to detect an empty space behind the wall of the King's Chamber by sonic resonance. He broke through the wall and found a horizontal shaft leading away from the chamber. Unfortunately it was only eight inches across and bent upwards after about six feet. He found another shaft on the opposite wall of the chamber. These shafts both exited the outside of the pyramid further up the structure and he guessed went there in a straight line. This is why they were originally thought to be ventilation ducts of some kind. Then Dixon turned his attention to the Queen's chamber and found similar shafts, but these did not exit the monument's exterior. He designed a tool with an extended handle, like a chimney sweep's brush, to probe the shafts and he found some artefacts; a copper hook of some kind and a wooden stick, but his own tool broke off while inside the shaft and he could make no further progress. We would have to wait a hundred and twenty years before a new adventure into these enigmatic shafts could commence. In 1992 a German engineer called Rudolf Gantenbrink designed a special robot to travel along the shafts. He found one of the shafts from the Queen's Chamber blocked by a stone door with what looked like metal clasps. Beside the door some crude marks had been painted on the walls. These are most likely the numbers 100, 20 and 1 in Egyptian hieroglyphics. This would make sense because the shaft at that point was 121 royal cubits in length, the unit of measurement ancient Egyptians used, equal to about twenty inches. This must mean the marks are the work of the pyramid builders. Gantenbrink's successors, the Djedi (pronounced "Jedi" as in Star Wars) Project redesigned the robot with a drill and it made a hole through what was now known as "Gantenbrink's door" and inserted a pinhole camera. The image that came back was frustrating; it showed merely a continuation of the shaft for a foot or so, and then a second obstructing block. The other shaft, on the opposite wall from the Queen's Chamber, bends sharply to the left after about forty feet to avoid the Grand Gallery, too sharply for the robot to move round, and more refits to the remote explorer were necessary, but eventually the archaeologists found a second door just like the one in the first shaft, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e2XxOPo0Gcc. (Graham Hancock suspects that some fraud took place and that the second shaft's door does not exist and the photographs of it are merely copies of those of the first door, see: http://grahamhancock.com/phorum/read.php?1,86354,86393.)

This is where research has halted. After this, a much larger hole would need to be made in Gantenbrink's door to allow any vehicle through, or the door would need to be removed altogether. There is no means at present to achieve that. It's reasonable to suppose that there are indeed unknown formations inside the Great Pyramid; after all some of the presently known ones were originally sealed off. If so what are they? What might lie inside any secret isolated chambers deep within that giant stone edifice? The problems of discovery are not just technological; they are political. The academic authorities in Egypt have often resisted any innovative ideas related to the Giza complex. For years this establishment was personified in the form of Dr Zahi Hawass, Egypt's Minster for Antiquities. Gantenbrink reports how Hawass was very uncooperative and obstructive with his project. Here he is getting angry at a debate with Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Ziu2ygE_Wc. A while ago I also covered the potential plight of the Egyptologist Anna Garnett and the mysterious moving statue in the Manchester Museum, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/egyptian-statue-moving.html. Luckily nothing untoward has happened to her career-wise as a result of her outspoken interview on BBC News. The authorities are clearly very upset over these new ideas to do with the history and spirituality of Egypt and, by extension, the world. They censor and vet anything going on that might upset their familiar apple cart. However, with the addition of this new evidence of thermal radiation coming from inside the Great Pyramid, how can they realistically maintain the false narrative this time?

Tuesday, 10 November 2015

Incontrovertible- the Premier

Last night I attended a movie premier. There was no red carpet, no audience of fans waving cameras and autograph books, no celebrities strutting around in diamond-studded bikinis; but then the movie I went to see would never be considered for that kind of attention by the media. The venue in London hosting the event was a small backstreet independent screen specializing in art-house flicks and world cinema; it has the pun name of Whirled Cinema, see: https://www.whirledcinema.com/. It lies at the end of Hardess Street in Brixton, a road so small that it is barely more than an extended layby and was not marked on my map. Luckily there were detailed directions on the back of my ticket; a wise move by management, probably learned through the experience of having customers not being able to find the place. I've been to Brixton several times now, all because of going to see David Icke live at the Brixton Academy, for example see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2010/05/see-here-for-my-report-on-previous-live.html. It is a tight-packed residential district south of the river which is a mixture of old Georgian and Victorian townhouses and modern terraces, flats and maisonettes, mostly occupied by black people. It's full of the traditional open air markets found all over London. There are a lot of stylish murals and art galleries giving the area a Bohemian feel. The Whirled Cinema sits at the Loughborough Junction, a spot where three railways lines meet in an arcing triangle of high bridges that merge and cross above the rooftops. The venue is actually built beneath one of the railway arches and its barrel vaulted brick ceiling is part of the bridge. It's not possible to completely soundproof the interior which means every five minutes the rumble of a train passing overhead fills the room. This could of course annoy some film viewers, but perhaps others will see it as part of a unique cinematic experience (I really should be working for Time Out). The entrance and foyer looked more like a nightclub than a cinema. I passed through a heavy security door which swung shut with an almighty crash behind me, and climbed a flight of steel steps to a darkened auditorium. There was no separate area for the screen, the row of seats opened immediately onto the barstools and bar where I ordered an expensive but delicious pint of Czech lager. I recognized a few of the people there from previous meetings and there were a few famous faces including Dr Niels Harrit who appears in the film. Here he is being harangued by the BBC; I think it's for one of the programmes I was asked to be in as well, but I more wisely refused, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aQdB27XBT6c. I also met a very pleasant man and woman whom I had a good conversation with and we shared a pizza from the takeaway next door.

The interior of the Whirled Cinema in London
I took a seat on the front row. The seats are actually large settees and are much more comfortable than regular cinema seats. A bald man came and sat beside me that I recognized as Ian Henshall, another contributor to the film, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6FXBs6E0dM. He remembered meeting me at a pervious 9/11 event. "It's amazing what they've done." he told me. "It looks like a very big budget film, but it's not really." The movie is called Incontrovertible, see: http://www.killingauntiefilms.co.uk/, and is aimed primarily at the emergency service professions (of which I include myself of course), especially the fire brigade, police officers and the armed forces. The passionate and eloquent narration addresses these people directly and persuasively. It calls on the fire brigade to strike over the issue and for the police and military to mutiny. "Do your job and don't be a coward! Don't collude with criminals!" the narrator demanded. "Unless you believe in miracles... that a huge skyscraper can collapse into rubble when no plane has hit it." The film was of course referring to Building 7, the third tower to disintegrate on September the 11th 2001. The destruction of WTC7 was announced by the BBC reporter Jane Stanley a full twenty minutes before it actually went down. There are scenes from archived Battle of Britain footage showing RAF pilots climbing into the cockpits of Spitfires. "Did these men really fight and die for the country we have today?" said the narrator. There is a sequence of the previous Remembrance Day service in Whitehall where David Cameron lays a wreath. "It's stomach churning! This bastard (sic) sends young men off to kill innocent people for his own greed and power struggles and then dares to show his face at a memorial service for them!" Cameron has recently branded people who doubt the official story of 9/11 as "non-violent extremists" and has made it clear he intends to use government resources to persecute us, see background links at the bottom. This includes myself of course. It also includes Matt Campbell whose brother Geoff perished in the World Trade Centre. I've met Matt a couple of times and have no doubt that the statistical threat he poses to the safety of the general public is in minus figures. He just wants to get justice for his brother. There's a poignant scene in the film in which Matt takes a rubbing of his brother's name from the list of casualties at the 9/11 memorial in New York. A number of people are interviewed in the movie, some very credible and others less so; I'll come to the latter later. The best of these scenes were the ones with firemen and policemen who have decided to reject the official story of 9/11 through sheer logic and expertise. The film explains that there is a historical precedent for false flag operations; this is where a violent act of warfare is perpetrated by somebody in a way that makes it look like somebody else did it in order to deceive strategically. We're all guilty of things like that. As a child did you ever smash up your own Lego model and try to pin it on your little brother so he'd get a smack from your dad? Governments do this too. Operation Northwoods of the 1960's is a prime example of a proposed false flag attack by the USA on its own territory; in this case the nominated culprit would be Cuba. The camera filmed shots of the Coliseum in Rome while this was described. Interestingly, and I don't know if this was deliberate on the part of the film makers, the earliest false flag attack I know of happened two thousand years ago in Rome when the emperor Nero started a huge fire and blamed it on his political enemies. As they say: "Nero fiddled while Rome burned". There is another very similar more recent example, Project for a New American Century. This was not a specific plan for a false flag attack, but it does hint that some kind of external menace would be necessary to gain public support for PNAC's objectives and that it would be advantageous if said menace carried out a major assault on the United States; what they themselves call: "a new Pearl Harbour", see here for more details: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/08/project-for-new-american-century.html. The film outlines how the 7/7 attacks were also a false flag, see here for more details: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/nick-kollerstrom-in-oxford-london.html. What's more, and this was a new one on me, the shooting of WPC Yvonne Fletcher in 1984 might be one too. This was when a young policewoman was killed by a gunman who was assumed to be inside the Libyan embassy which she was guarding at the time, but in fact the bullet might have come from another direction. Either way, the murder of this brave young police officer on live TV turned public opinion into supporting the American air strikes against Gaddafi's regime. Cynthia McKinney, a former US Presidential candidate who appeared at Ian R Crane's AV3 conference, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/11/alternative-view-3-part-4.html, believes that the assassination of Martin Luther King was also a false flag. This is true; even Dr King's family believed that James Earl Ray was just another "patsy" and supported him during his retrial. Another suspicious element to 9/11 was the put option scandal. A put option is a device stockbrokers have to have an exclusive right to buy or sell a share without actually completing the sale; it is essentially a bet on the changes in the stock market. Shortly before 9/11 somebody took out a put option on American Airlines and United Airlines that both companies' stock would shortly plummet. They were the airlines that had their aircraft allegedly hijacked and rammed into the buildings. The broker made a fortune off their amazing "good luck". Oddly enough that person or organization has never been traced, but even the skeptics don't try to claim that it's just a coincidence. The Incontrovertible film is the brainchild of Tony Rooke, a man who was prosecuted for refusing to pay his TV licence because of the lies the BBC had told about 9/11. He appeared in court and had with him expert witnesses, including Tony Farrell, a police officer who was sacked for his views on 9/11, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/british-humanist-association-conspiracy.html and: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/tony-farrell.html. The film tries to talk to the emotions of those serving in the emergency services and the armed forces. Since the start of the various incarnations of the "War on Terror" the leading cause of death among allied combatants has not been enemy fire, but suicide. Servicemen often become depressed and take their own lives, usually when deployed home after a tour of duty in Iraq or Afghanistan. The incidence of this is far worse than in any other war in the past, including those where casualties were far higher such as the Great War or World War II. The family of one such solider speak out on camera to say that they believe that it is the specific nature of this war that has hurt the servicemen so badly. The immorality and depravity of it has done far more harm than any hostile army.
Tony Rooke has continued to obey the law... that is to resist funding a corrupt and deceitful organization in accordance with his obligations under the constitution of this country. Matt Campbell has done the same and this is admirable. I would join them and refuse to pay my own TV licence as well, if I had one in the first place. Hopefully the film will inspire those in the emergency services and military in exactly the way the film makers want it to. However there is a catastrophic flaw with Incontrovertible that could potentially undo the noble sentiments of most of those involved with it. The film explains how the official story of 9/11 is "irrefutably, undeniably, incontestably, indisputably, unarguably and unassailably" fake. Ian Henshall is also absolutely right, that it is technically brilliant. However it makes very few statements about any alternative solution to what happened on that terrible day. There are three scenes only in the film in which Dr Niels Harrit, Richard Gage and two other people explain what they think was really done to the Twin Towers, but, as I've said many times, their "thermitically correct" explanation is completely bogus. The film publicizes the actions of Tony Rooke and Matt Campbell in court without saying a single word about the fact that the official story of 9/11 has already been legally challenged before. One of the slogans of the Truth movement is "Reinvestigate 9/11!" You'll see it printed on banners, T-shirts and scrawled on walls as graffiti. However there already has been a proper scientific reinvestigation of 9/11. It was carried out by one Dr Judy Wood, a professor of mechanical engineering at Clemson University in North Carolina USA. She has published a detailed book called Where Did the Towers Go? explaining her discovery. Also, along with two other people, she has filed a lawsuit against NIST- the National Institute of Standards and Technology for the falsehoods in their original 9/11 investigation, see: http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.shtml. Dr Wood has proved that no conventional explosives were used to destroy the World Trade Centre, instead a weapon was deployed based on the "Hutchison Effect"; which was itself discovered by the Canadian inventor John Hutchison. Hutchison runs a private laboratory in which has been attempting to repeat some of the experiments of the Serbian electrical genius Nikola Tesla. He found that if electromagnetic fields interfere in a certain way strange things start to happen. A very powerful force is unleashed that is not currently understood by physics. When Hutchison generated this effect he found that it had certain properties that Dr Wood noticed were also present during the 9/11 attacks. For instance when the "collapse" of the north tower begins it looks as if it does so from the plane impact site and continues down the building. According to the NIST report this was a chain reaction of structural failure due to the weight of descending debris above; however when buildings normally collapse bits fall off them and make a pile of rubble on the ground beside it. In the case of the north tower, when the wave of destruction has reached the point where half the tower has already gone nothing yet has touched the ground. Instead there was a huge cloud of dust surrounding the carnage. There are chunks of masonry falling, but these are falling only slightly faster than the rate of general dissolution and they dissolve in mid air like a soluble tablet dissolving in water. In one of the news shots you can see the central core columns of the tower standing naked after the rest of the building has gone, and these then pulverize as we watch. There are bizarre effects noticeable in the vicinity during the period after the destruction of the towers too. Cars and emergency vehicles were found which are ruined, but this does not appear to be fire damage. They look more like cars that have been left in a scrap yard for twenty years, withered away by rust and the elements. This degeneration seems to be very localized. There is even a photograph of a police car in which the front half is completely destroyed and the back half completely intact; the tyres haven't even been punctured and the plastic fittings have not melted. Fires can be seen at Ground Zero which are burning right next to piles of paper, but the paper is not catching fire. Some of the "toasted cars" are parked next to trees which are completely intact, without so much as a scotched leaf. There are far too many other strange phenomena in the 9/11 attacks to list here, but Dr Judy Wood's book and website does. It is the basis of my recent debate on the KTPF Community Talk Show and my article in the KTPF Magazine, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/article-by-ben-emlyn-jones-in-ktpf.html. Some of the people in the 9/11 Truth movement are lying to us, every bit as much as the BBC and others promoting the official story. As with the mainstream media, many of the individuals helping to propagate the lies are simply suffering from psychological denial, wilful ignorance or a failure of imagination and nerve; but with certain individuals I suspect they are knowing disinformation agents; and I do not make accusations like that lightly, in fact I warn against it, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/the-shill-squad.html. Stephen E Jones is somebody in particular who has some serious questions to answer over his involvement in the "Cold Fusion" scandal, many years before 9/11, see: http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=382&Itemid=60. There are even signs of some major duplicity going on during the mainstream media coverage of Tony Rooke's trial. As Andrew Johnson and Richard D Hall have pointed out, in this article the second photograph should cause us some serious alarm, see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2284337/TV-licence-evader-refused-pay-BBC-covered-facts-9-11.html. The banner reads: "Remember, remember the 11th of September. Thermite, treason and plot", but we know from Dr Judy Wood's work that the true story of 9/11 is completely different. Therefore this photograph is a distraction, orchestrated, intentionally or through error, either by the designer of that banner or the newspaper, or both. The 9/11 Truth movement must come to terms with this matter, and that includes Tony Rooke and everybody else behind the film Incontrovertible, if any progress is to be made. I enjoyed the movie; it was a brilliant effort. I'm grateful for the organizers of the premier for inviting me along. I think this film has the potential to make so many people aware of 9/11 who were not otherwise, and encourage them to take action; but not unless it is remade into new and updated version that includes a report on the issues I've raised in this review. It might sound like a tautology, but "9/11 Truth" must be completely true, in order to be really the truth.

Monday, 9 November 2015

BenX Conference- Cancelled

I regret to inform you that the BenX-Beyond Fear Conference has been cancelled. This was an event I was due to speak at, see here for details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/10/ben-emlyn-jones-at-benx-beyond-fear.html. Ben and Jackie released the following statement yesterday: "Unfortunately we have had to cancel the event as Ben's situation has deteriorated over the past couple of weeks.
He had to leave the new forest as his life was put in danger and he felt incredibly ill as a result; which is currently under investigation. Ben is now living in a tent penniless on a camp site being helped by close friends under incredibly difficult circumstances.
In his present condition it is impossible for Ben to even get to the event or have access to the internet. Two weeks ago Kenneth Clarke at a meeting in Nottingham stated that he had Ben prosecuted and found guilty at his trial. This is NOT TRUE and illustrates the lengths the government is going to reframe history and to make Ben's life as difficult as possible simply because Ben won. Ben desperately needs your help. So if there is anything anyone can do please get in touch with me or Lou Collins as soon as possible. Thank you so much. Jackie x (on behalf of Ben)", see: https://www.facebook.com/events/175682039436702/.
I can only join Jackie and the others in wishing Ben all the best. Hopefully a new conference can be organized in the future to replace this one.

Friday, 6 November 2015

Internet Surveillance and Talk Talk

Teresa May is the most authoritarian home secretary since David Blunkett... which wasn't long ago. She has built a suspiciously similar framework over the very foundations he laid, even though she is Conservative and he was Labour. The latest new measure has been given the usual Orwellian euphemistic name, the "draft Investigatory Powers bill". Well, they can hardly sell it as the "Internet Total Control and Regulation bill" can they? The reason for its introduction is a classic problem-reaction-solution. In her address in the House of Commons where she proposes her bill Ms May mentions organized crime, fraud, terrorists and child abuse in the space of two minutes; "the threat is clear". This is an insult considering that the threat from all three of those examples primarily originate within the walls of Parliament itself, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/general-election-result.html, and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/nick-kollerstrom-in-oxford-london.html, and: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/cyril-smith-was-set-free.html. She has also reassured us that there will be limits on the powers of this legislation; of course there will be... for now. Once the go-ahead is given, the infrastructure of total internet control can be developed without obstruction and the law changed again when it is ready; frog-in-a-saucepan style. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34715872. Shami Chakrabarti, the director of Liberty, the civil rights legal defence group, said in response: "After all the talk of climb-downs and safeguards, this long-awaited Bill constitutes a breath-taking attack on the internet security of every man, woman and child in our country. We must now look to Parliament to step in where ministers have failed and strike a better balance between privacy and surveillance." Perhaps a recommended first step for her would be to quit the Ditchley Foundation, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/06/ditchley-park-on-internet-security.html. A couple a weeks ago the communications company Talk Talk was struck down by a cyber-attack amidst much publicity, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34743185. In light of the convenient timing of Teresa May's bill, I wonder if it was a real event. None of this is a surprise to anybody in the conspiratorial community. No doubt intelligence agencies carry out this kind of intrusiveness anyway. Even this mainstream article brings up Edward Snowden's claims: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/04/theresa-may-surveillance-measures-edward-snowden.

Wednesday, 4 November 2015

New Probe

I'm an aficionado of the UFO/conspiracy/paranormal conference circuit. I attend as many as time and money allow. Luckily in the last couple of years I've been speaking or working at many of them too, or been given a press pass by the organizer, and so don't have to pay. My favourite conference of all has to be UK Probe International. This twice yearly event is the first one I ever attended in October 2006 and it has become an important part of my life. I'm bonded like family to the people who join me there regularly. I've covered the conference on the HPANWO blog and HPANWO TV many times, most recently see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/probe-autumn-2014.html. However this series of events is now sadly coming to an end. Since it began in 1990, the organizers of the Probe conferences were Jean and Sam Wright and they quickly built a pioneering format which many other later UFO/conspiracy/paranormal conferences were inspired by. Yet Jean and Sam were not young people and in 2011 Jean tragically died. Sam has steadfastly continued with the Probe schedule since then, sharing the job of organization with his son Paul and other local supporters. Nevertheless this situation has now changed. Although the Wright family remain chief executive officers, the Probe franchise has been licensed to a brand new organizational business team who will be transforming the entire Probe experience.

The first of the new Probe conferences will be held in October 2016, from the Friday the 14th to October the 16th, and it will include a film festival, and special relaunch celebration; plus an exclusive evening presentation by Erich von Däniken, author of many books about the ancient alien theoy, including Chariots of the Gods? and Remnants of the Gods. The venue is moving from Lytham St Annes to the north shore of Blackpool and the luxury Norbreck Castle Hotel, a splendid 480 room 19th century hotel with the beach in front of it and a golf course behind. There's talk of livestreaming the proceedings on the net and there will be a demonstration by Michael Ostaski a "speed painter", which means what it literally says. He paints amazing pictures within an hour or so accompanied by music composed by Howard Wulkan. The new management team includes Vitaly Safarov, an ET contact experiencer from Israel and Georgia who has spoken at the conference in 2009, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/10/probe-autumn-2008-part-3.html. There are other people from the USA who used to be connected with Dolores Cannon and her Ozark Mountains Press. Phenomena magazine, edited by Steve Mera, is one of the new sponsors. There's a contingent from China and several other countries and organizations too. Vitaly did a special announcement on stage during the last conference where I was a speaker. On November the 1st the new website was launched, see: http://probeufoparanormal.com/. The Probe conference is basically moving upmarket. Its new format will put it in the same league as the International UFO Congress in Laughlin, Nevada USA and the annual Nexus conferences in Australia and the Netherlands. I must say the outfit looks very impressive and I look forward to attending the first event, if I can. However I will miss what we have now with Probe. A draughty basketball court full of plastic folding chairs, hired at the YMCA in St Annes-on-the-Sea is a far cry from the mighty Norbreck Castle with its thousand-seat ballroom, its health club and its "Norcalympia" conference centre; but it had a sweet charm unique to itself. I'm well aware that Sam Wright cannot carry on organizing the conference forever and change was inevitable. I wish "new Probe" all the very best of luck and I hope they can deliver the events that they promise, ones that are educational, enjoyable and inspirational. As they say in their mission statement, they wish to: "...educate and entertain audiences in the field of UFOlogy, the paranormal and spirituality; and to offer a new generation of speakers and researchers a public platform where transformational media, such as lectures, conscious films and documentaries, arts, fashion and courses can be showcased to a global audience. It is hoped that we can expand our horizons in the field, to encourage a greater understanding of our world and that we can engage with a greater community around the globe; to facilitate the broadest information platform in collaboration with organisations alike." Tickets are not yet on sale and the website doesn't say how much they will cost, but it is inescapable that they will be more expensive than those for the present conference, probably significantly so. How many of the current delegates have a budget that can accommodate the October conference? I fear for the future of the Probe community, my second family. The organizers of "new Probe" want to preserve the legacy of Jean and Sam Wright and that naturally includes the close-knit society of the Probe delegation, but is that realistic? We will have to wait and see. In the meantime the last ever Probe conference in its original format will be taking place next April; the old website is still up and details will be published there shortly: http://www.ukprobe.com/. Please come to this event if you can because after this there will never be another chance to experience the Probe conferences as I've described them in my many reports. And go to the first ever "new Probe" event in October if you can. My friend and fellow researcher Ellis Taylor has done his own write-up of the last event which includes his own feelings about "new Probe", see: http://ellisctaylor.com/2015/10/18/probe-international-p-i-%CF%80-227-the-mysteries-keep-coming/.

Tuesday, 3 November 2015

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 15

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 15 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see: http://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk/subscriptions-shop/.
Issue 15 includes an article in my column, entitled: CE3 at Presque Isle in 1966. Holiday makers on a beach at night witnessed the landing of a strange craft and the emergence of an ape-like being from the woods.

Also you will find in Issue 15: A new column by Stanton Friedman, a review of the recent UFO Truth Magazine conference, UFO-inspired music by Dave Hodrien and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth's editor Gary Heseltine: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/programme-124-podcast-gary-heseltine.html.
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 14: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/09/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-14.html.

Monday, 2 November 2015

Ben Emlyn-Jones on Enemy Within Radio 19

I have been interviewed again on Enemy Within Radio with Thomas Barnes and Andy Young, see: https://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/enemy-within-radio-live-164.

I appear through the whole of the programme. Subjects discussed include: secrets of ancient Egypt, artificial structures on Mars, the migrant crisis and much much more.
See here for my previous appearance on Enemy Within Radio: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/ben-emlyn-jones-on-enemy-within-radio-17.html.