Tuesday, 10 February 2015

Rauni Kilde Dies

I'm very sorry to report the death of Dr Rauni-Leena Luukanen-Kilde. Rauni was a doctor and the former chief medical officer of Lapland. All her life she was interested in the paranormal and in 1982 released her first book Kuolemaa ei Ole (There Is No Death). Since then she has written many more books and articles; she has lectured extensively all around the world on the supernatural, ghosts, UFO's, mind control, shadow governments and all related subjects. She has worked closely with Miles Johnston and the Bases Project, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpPXf0oLKRA, and has also been a guest on HPANWO Radio, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/programme-33-podcast-rauni-kilde.html. She lived in Søn, Norway for many years, in a lovely house by the side of a lake where Miles was a regular guest. She then moved to Vaasa in her native Finland where she died on the 8th of February 2015 following a long illness aged seventy-five. Rauni Kilde was an intelligent and insightful lady whom I found enthralling to listen to. Wherever she is now, I hope she's well and I know she will continue to assist in the quest for human freedom from the other side of the veil. Rest in peace, Rauni Kilde.

Monday, 9 February 2015

Monster Rats

Is the rat-o-pocalypse upon us? Perhaps that old cruise liner I mentioned last year really did crash into the rocks of the west coast, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/ship-of-rats.html. Rats are a perennial problem for mankind; they are our eternal parasites and that will never change. There are very few places we have ever lived where they have not lived with us. Recently though people in several locations across Britain have been reporting the presence of very different rats to those we're familiar with. An adult sewer or brown rat is on average ten inches long from nose to tail. It can be killed by a wide variety of industrial poisons. These new kinds of rats are very different; in several very frightening ways. Firstly they're up to twice the size, a specimen was found that was twenty inches long. Also they seem to be immune to normal rodenticides. Standard rat poison is odourless and tasteless so when mixed in with bait the rat will consume a lethal dose before it realizes anything is amiss. The poison works by containing an anticoagulant, in other words is makes the blood very thin and watery so that it leaks out of the blood vessels and kills its victim through internal bleeding. However, along with the giant rats other rats have appeared where these poisons are useless. What's more attempts to eradicate them could make the problem worse by eliminating the ordinary rats and leaving the super-rats alone to breed with themselves, thus accelerating natural selection. According to biologists, the rats with poison immunity and the giant rats are both caused by a genetic mutation, and both kinds have emerged at the same time, see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2942740/Mutant-20-inch-super-rats-closing-Wiltshire-town-t-killed-poison-warn-pest-exterminators.html#ixzz3R4xoZHnL. The immune rats are currently clustered in a wide area around Hampshire and the southern Midlands; unfortunately this includes Oxford where I live. This could indicate that they arrived from abroad on a ship which called at Southampton harbour. The giant rats are much more widespread; they've been seen in Wiltshire, Birmingham, Liverpool, Bradford and County Durham. Does this mean they've been around longer? There's a traditional song from Great War which contains the lyrics: "There were rats, rats as big as bloody cats in the quartermaster's stores". Whoever composed that song was probably exaggerating, but these new giant rats really are as big as small cats, and a cat may not be enough to take one on; hence the plummer terrier the rat-catcher is using in the video embedded in the article. I question the coincidence of two types of rat appearing at the same time in the same country. I wasn't really serious when I suggested that the Lyubov Orlova had actually crashed ashore in the British Isles as I'd feared; I'm certain that the unfortunate vessel is now lying at the bottom of the Atlantic, probably never to be seen again, and that all the rats on board have perished. But were these new rats introduced deliberately? If so, by whom, and for what purpose? As I explain the article about the ship, there are plenty of other ways to go about the mission the globalists have set themselves in relation to things like pseudolife, population reduction and geoengineering; who needs pestilential rodents? The news story talks about one of the first twenty-inch rats found in Swindon; that's not far from Porton Down, the UK's "former" biological warfare facility. The biologist in the article talks about how the rats have a mutant gene, a "strain". It's interesting how experts use the same terminology with rats as they do with microbes; this is not how they talk about other animal species. They speculate that these rats are going to become a bigger problem unless all the bloodlines with this genetic mutation can be eliminated. These rats can cause serious hygiene problems in kitchens and larders, restaurants and public buildings. They also knaw water pipes and electric cables causing billions of pounds-worth of damage. Pest controllers recommend disposing of rubbish correctly and keeping food storage and service area clean.

Sunday, 8 February 2015

Is Elvis Alive?

Stop laughing!... I was talking to somebody the other day and he made it clear he took a very dim view of conspiracy theories. He gave a little titter and said in a mocking tone: "So, you think Elvis is still alive, right?" Actually I don't believe all conspiracy theories; the moon is not an alien space station, the Earth is not hollow and Lewis Hamilton is not Barrack Obama's lovechild. I had no doubt, note the pluperfect tense, that Elvis Presley was as dead as the dodo; I still have few, but not as few as I used to. The great singer-songwriter who was nicknamed "the King" died at his home on the 16th of August 1977. He was found unresponsive on the bathroom floor after having suffered a heart attack while sitting on the toilet; a book was lying beside him that he'd been reading at the time. He was just forty-two years old. His health had been deteriorating after his extremely acrimonious divorce a few years earlier, which had been a media sensation. News reports, TV programmes and books had been appearing revealing secret aspects of his personal life and Elvis found this very difficult to deal with. He took all kinds of drugs and put on a huge amount of weight. He doggedly continued performing even when he could hardly stand on the stage due to the psychological and physical conditions he had developed. Like many great figures in the arts, Elvis suffered terrible emotional pain his whole life. He had originally had a twin brother who had died shortly before their birth; and apparently this kind of experience can affect one's entire life and Elvis dedicated part of the grounds of his home, Graceland in Memphis, Tennessee USA as a memorial garden to the twin brother he never grew up with. Therefore the official story of his death is perfectly plausible.

Yet ever since his death was announced a dedicated number of people have refused to believe that Elvis Presley died and instead claim that he's still alive. He either faked his own death or was forced to take on a new identity. There is a traditional website on this subject, see: http://www.elvis-is-alive.com/, but of course nowadays most of their activity centres around their Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/evidenceelvispresleyisalive. A psychologist would of course dismiss everything they do as simple denial. This tendency consists almost entirely of Elvis' fans and they can't face the fact that he's dead because they loved him so much. However regular HPANWO-readers already know how little I think of psychologists. Could it be possible? Well, firstly I certainly don't think Elvis faked his own death himself. If he had he would have made it a different death; nobody famous wants their last moments to be forever remembered as sitting on the bog reading a book. It would have been something dramatic and glamourous like maybe a plane crash or driving a car over a cliff. Or suicide like the comedy character Reginald Perrin. If he were somehow brainwashed or otherwise forced to take on a new identity against his will then why? No idea. Yet these questions have not fazed those who maintain that Elvis lives to this day. This week it would have been Elvis' 80th birthday, and the Facebook group has been inundated with e-cards in the hope that maybe somewhere the King is sitting there reading them, see: http://www.newsweek.com/his-80th-birthday-revisiting-conspiracies-have-kept-elvis-presley-alive-297968. People still write in to announce that they've seen Elvis in public places, sitting in a diner or stepping onto a train. They question the validity of Elvis' funeral and whether another body wasn't substituted for the man they thought they were burying. These claims are rather spurious, yet occasionally a more substantive story comes to light. I was on the phone to a friend of mine the other day and he told me that it had been reported on American television that there was been a road traffic accident in which an elderly man had been killed who'd be positively identified as Elvis Presley. There are no online references for what he said, but I did find this: http://empirenews.net/shocking-dna-results-revealed-body-of-elderly-homeless-man-identified-as-elvis-presley/. Obviously both stories can't be true; Elvis can only die once. However if Presley was involved with the FBI to what extent did this involvement go. I am not convinced by this idea at all; sadly I think Elvis Presley is dead and he died the way history tells us he did. Personally I think there's far more evidence for another case which is an entirely opposite situation in the music world, that a celebrity rock and roll star is thought to be alive when he is in fact dead, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/11/is-paul-mccartney-dead.html.

Saturday, 7 February 2015

Swedish Office Microchips Staff

A newly-opened office building in Stockholm, Sweden is being used in a trial for the microchipping of people. This is a subject I've covered extensively, see the background links below. The chip is the size of a grain of rice and is inserted under the skin of the hand in a minor surgical procedure. In the news report the BBC journalist Rory Cellan-Jones receives one himself. Once chipped the office employee is connected to a single database that covers door locks, lifts, computer log-ins and other equipment. It's obvious that these devices have come on a long way since the earliest Verichip and Digital Angel systems which were just simple RFID transmitters. These new chips can store large files which can be downloaded from the employee to printers, smartphones and other devices, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-31037989. The risks of this system are many-fold. One immediate effect is that once chipped you are forever connected to an electronic database from which you can never log off. If you allow this database to control everyday aspects of your life, like opening your front door or starting your car engine, then it makes you totally dependent on that system to function in society. It gives whoever controls that system complete control over your life. The perceived benefits will lure people into the net: "You'll never have burglars!" "Your car insurance will be really cheap!" "Your bank details will be completely safe!" etc. Aaron Russo had a lot to say about bank details in his 2007 interview with Alex Jones; he said that the goal of the New World Order was to have every citizen entered onto a computer network connected to a electronic implant in their body from which every aspect of their life would be controlled in the ultimate high-tech Big Brother state. Anybody who disobeyed an order from the government would be simply removed from the network, be unable to do anything, including being able to buy food and therefore starve to death, see: http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/290107rockefellergoal.htm. In the novel Better Than Life, a book based on the ingenious sci-fi comedy series Red Dwarf, one of the characters punishes a man by taking out a court order that stops him from buying Heinz baked beans; instead he has to put up with inferior supermarket brands. This may sound funny, but many a true word is spoken in jest. In the microchipped society just such a punishment will become possible.

The company which runs the Stockholm office block has reassured us by saying that its staff are not obliged to be microchipped, it's left up to them as a matter of personal choice. It's not in any way compulsory... yet! They key word is "yet!". It's the classic frog-in-a-saucepan metaphor: If you throw a frog into a pan of boiling water it will jump straight out before being badly hurt; but if you throw it into a pan of cold water and slowly turn up the heat, it will sit there and cook. We all have to be smart frogs who are aware of that trick and make sure we don't even get into the pan at all. Microchipping will always start off as a voluntary scheme, but as more and more people are seduced by the ease and convenience of it eventually there will be only a minority left who are unchipped. After all, this technology was only originally intended to be used on dogs; nobody originally suggested humans could be chipped at all. Eventually the firm will throw up their hands in mock indignation and say: "Oh well, we might as well make the rest of them do it!" This is why I made such a fuss when my daughter's school tried to fingerprint her; I suspect that this was a cold saucepan of some kind, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2007/11/this-is-drawing-done-by-my-12-year-old.html. The rate technology is advancing, even if we don't speculate about what is available in secret black budget government projects. We could be looking very soon at electronic implants that can do far more than just store spreadsheets and pay for Starbucks; devices could be used that have a direct effect on the human body. Of particular concern is of course the brain. I suspect that psychotronics are already in use in some targeted individuals, but the experimental stage might be expanded into common practice very soon. I fear we could be on the brink of it if we don't wise up and get out of the saucepan now, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/mark-mutch-sectioned.html.
My two friends and fellow researchers on YouTube, Izzy Smart and Jamnoise72 have both made videos on this subject too.
And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/09/michael-dimercurio-and-kevin-warwick.html.

Friday, 6 February 2015

New Judge for Child Abuse Inquiry

Teresa May has finally found a new judge for the government's "independent" child abuse inquiry; however she had to import one from the other side of the world. Justice Lowell Goddard, a High Court Judge in New Zealand, will be the new chairwoman, the third. There's no doubt that UK Government plc are dragging their heels and kicking the can down the road as much as they can. Ms Goddard considers herself at an advantage because she's not British. She says: "I come with no context in terms of the inquiry itself; certainly no agendas other than to work hard and get to the bottom of the allegations, and to find answers for the survivors and government." This has impressed some pressure groups. Peter Saunders of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood said that Justice Goddard would enhance the credibility of the affair. See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-31134096. I'm curious to know what my friend Brian Clare thinks of her, see background links below. Ms Goddard may not be British, but she is still on the Queen's Council, as all barristers have to be. New Zealand is a British Commonwealth nation with the same Crown state as the UK. This means she has sworn an oath to serve that state and this is still essentially the state which is investigating itself. I wonder how long it will be before this one resigns.

Marine Le Pen at the Oxford Union

The controversial French politician Marine Le Pen has spoken at the Oxford Union, one of the world's most prestigious venues. I went there hoping to get in and see her; a friend of mine who's a Union member promised to meet me there and sign me in. The reason I wanted to see her speak is because her father, the former French presidential candidate Jean-Marie Le Pen, recently made some explosive comments about the Charlie Hebdo massacre. He said that in his opinion it was a false-flag attack carried out by an intelligence agency with the connivance of the French governmeny, see: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/paris-attacks-jeanmarie-le-pen-says-french-terror-attacks-were-work-of-western-intelligence-9985047.html. This echoes my own research very closely, but I never expected such a senior statesman as Le Pen to say such a thing, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/charlie-hebdo.html. Then again, I hear the president of Turkey made a similar statement. Le Pen has pointed out how amazingly convenient it was that one of the Kouachi brothers happened to drop his ID in the getaway car; reminiscent of the 9/11 hijacker's passport at Ground Zero. Both are planted evidence in my view. His daughter now leads his party and topped the polls at the recent European election; she has been trying to make the party more moderate, more like UKIP than the BNP, and is opposed to her father's remarks, but I still wonder if she'd let anything slip. Her party, the Front National, is the principle mouthpiece of the far right in France. It is for this reason that when I arrived at the gate of the Oxford Union a large crowd of protesters had gathered. They were holding placards, banging drums and chanting slogans like "LE PEN- NEVER AGAIN!" and "OXFORD UNION- SHAME ON YOU!" The event was covered by the news, see: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-31155755.

As I walked past the demonstration and took my place in the queue waiting outside the gate the protesters glared balefully at us. I felt very uncomfortable because the event was organized by Unite Against Fascism, an organization capable of extreme behaviour. Organizations like the UAF, collectively known as "Antifa", campaign to get employees sacked from their jobs or have students sent down from universities; they post hate mail, burn books, make violent threats and throw stones at people's houses. What's more I myself might be on their hit-list and they have a database of infamous faces. Last year I was "reported" to the UAF by somebody when I announced that I was going to do my speech at BUFOG, somebody on a forum posted that they'd written an open letter to the Birmingham branch of the UAF:
"Dear UAF. I think you have a right to know that there will be a live event in Birmingham soon which will feature a speaker of a nature that opposes democratic values and community health. All the evidence is included in this email. His name is Ben Emlyn-Jones and he comes from Oxford. He will be addressing the Birmingham Unidentified Flying Object Group on Thursday the 15th of May this year. The reasons I think you should be alerted are-
1. He is mentally ill. He believes in flying saucers and space aliens, hence his appearance at a UFO group. He is clearly suffering from autism and also some kind of schizotypal delusional disorder, indeed he claims to have seen UFOs and ghosts and other fantastical nonsense like that. He also has spoken in Birmingham before where he did a two hour lecture claiming that zombies are real!? No, I’m not making this up. Sorry I never warned you beforehand then. He runs an organization called Hospital Porters Against the New World Order. He’s a big fan of David Icke who famously believes that the Queen is secretly a lizard monster from outer space.
2. He’s a '9/11 truther', which means he thinks 9/11 was done by the US Government as an 'inside job'. This makes him a fascist crackpot (Christopher Hitchens)
3. He believes that the world is controlled by a single secret entity which he calls 'Illuminati' or 'New World Order'. He is a raving nutjob firebrand who supports almost every brain-dead conspiracy theory you can think of. The thing is when he says 'Illuminati' he really means Jews. He is using code, as the dedicated campaigner against hate-speech in Canada, Richard Warman, has shown. Emlyn-Jones is actually a Nazi anti-Semite.
4. He’s a racist piece of white supremacist scum who hates black people and would be in the Ku Klux Klan if he lived in America! He wears blackface makeup to mock President Barack Obama! Why do you think he looks like a skinhead? Because he IS one.
5. He hates Muslims too and is probably in the EDL. He mocks them in one of his 'comedy' sketches. He got sacked from his job as a hospital porter for making this film, quite rightly so!
Please do everything you can to stop this individual infecting Birmingham with his Nazi hatemongering, racist, demented drivel. I have shown you all the evidence in words from his own lips to prove that he really is exactly what I say he is. Thank you."
I have consulted a solicitor over this matter and am in the process of tracking down the individual responsible. It hasn't helped that a former friend of mine of Facebook is also spreading rumours that I'm a racist and misogynist; mud flung by Antifa is hard to wash off. Luckily anybody who knows me will not believe these lies. However these so-called anti-fascists tend not to take much notice of retractions. See how they pelted David Icke with pies in a bookshop in Canada (from 39 mins): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2ypYcZ7qfw. It struck me that there were only two policemen outside in the street; all the others were inside guarding Marine Le Pen. The UAF outnumbered us considerably and could charge into us if they wanted.
The protesters did manage to cover the ground around the gates forcing the staff inside to shut them so a few of us in the queue couldn't get in; I heard that the seats were almost full by then anyway. Some of them scaled the fence and jumped into the grounds to be ejected by the police and Le Pen's personal bouncers. Their objection is that the Oxford Union is giving a platform to a "fascist" and therefore promoting "fascism". How do we know Marine Le Pen is a fascist? Because the UAF tell us she is. We can't know by listening to her ourselves, if the UAF had their way, because they'd shut down all her platforms. We just have to take their word for it! This is all very Orwellian I think. In any situation when there is official censorship there has to be, by definition, an "enlightened elite" who sit around a table vetting everything and everyone, deciding what we, the ignorant masses, get to see and not see. These people don't seem to realize that any platform, even the Oxford Union, is a double-edged sword. I personally disagree with most of Marine Le Pen's views. She has made a vocal stance for the anti-immigration lobby whereas I think that is a mistake, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/illegal-immigrants-and-proud.html. However the best way to deal with somebody whom you disagree with is to let them have their say and then explain why they're wrong. Don't tell them to shut up; that will turn them into a free speech martyr and ghettoize them. Then their ideas will fester, preying on the immature, disillusioned and desperate who can never hear them detracted and so will believe them blindly. To have her policies demolished by a wrecking ball of logic in a free and open debate would be the biggest blow Marine Le Pen could endure. I remember when Nick Griffin of the BNP was due to appear on Question Time there was a similar protest outside the BBC, but when Griffin got in front of the cameras he made an utter pig's arse of himself in front of millions of viewers and the BNP dropped several percent in the opinions polls; it was one of the most amusing episodes of QT ever, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4iKfrY9l2kY. At one point I yelled at one of the protesters: "Don't tell me what to think!" The mob was right up close to us now as we were near to the gate. Some of them had earlier blocked the gate and so it was locked from the inside. They weren't violent, but they were yelling loudly and pointing fingers at us. Some of them were wearing facemasks to hide their identity and one was waving the flag of the Communist Party. It was getting cold and my feet were numb; there were only about ten of us still there, but we were staying put. The crowd had chanted at us "GO HOME! GO HOME!" and I felt I had to wait there just to defy them and make a stand for free speech. The protest broke up when it was announced that Ms Le Pen had finished her speech and so I left. As I walked up Cornmarket Street I saw a squad of policemen guarding the alleyway that leads to the back entrance of the Union and across the road in Market Street a car with blacked out windows and a gaggle of men in suits stood waiting. So that was how they planned to get Ms Le Pen out. I considered waiting to see if there was a chance to speak to her when she made her exit, but the expressions on the faces of the men in suits discouraged me. I hear she can't speak English; she used an interpreter for her speech. How much did she really know anyway? Would she let anything slip to me personally? She's spoken out against her father's "conspiracy theory". Interestingly a few days after he made those remarks, Jean-Marie Le Pen narrowly escaped with his life when a fire broke out in his house... coincidence? See: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11370225/Jean-Marie-Le-Pen-injured-in-house-fire.html.

Thursday, 5 February 2015

Weighing up the Enemy- my Lucky Escape

A few weeks ago Weighing up the Enemy was launched on Channel 4. This was a programme that had the original working title of Fatonomics and I was asked to take part in it myself... I declined. I review the first episode here: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/weighing-up-enemy.html. At the time I suspected that if I'd agreed to join the cast they'd have put me up against an overweight Skeptic; they would have. His name is Kev and he competes against a man who is clearly my replacement, a practicing psychic medium named Kevin. It's spooky to watch my alter ego do battle with the powers of calorific Skepticism, as if I'm watching the programme from another dimension in which I'm in his place, as I so very nearly was.
It's currently available on 4OD, see: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/weighing-up-the-enemy/on-demand/59354-004. (This link will only be live for a limited time; if a more permanent link becomes available I'll edit it in; keep checking back.)

Kevin is a portly and softly-spoken former Kentish police detective whose passion for stir-fry meals, beer, wine and curry has caused his weight to blossom to twenty-three stone. His enemy in the pound-shedding wars is a Skeptic from Northern Ireland called Kev; did he shorten his name to avoid them being confused? He's a photographer by trade and not a professional scientist, but many Skeptics I know are also self-taught amateurs. He has several children and wants to be healthy so he can live to take care of them. If he wins, his woo-woo rival's money will go to Ciaran O'Keeffe who, unknown to me, is apparently a representative of the Irish Skeptics Society. O'Keeffe is of course very famous for being one of the presenters of Most Haunted. I've met Dr O'Keeffe, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/weird-10.html, and wouldn't describe him as a Skeptic. In fact he is kind of standing on the bridge being shot at from both sides. He's that bane of the Skeptisphere- an academic parapsychologist, but he has also been accused of faking many of the scenes in his TV show by fellow paranormal researchers. Kevin plans to rub Kev's nose in it by spending his winnings on hosting a psychic event at a theatre. The belt-tightening battle commences with the identical monotonous rigmarole that I detail in my review of the first episode. As a Skeptic about nutrition as much as he is a Skeptic about everything else, Kev believes in the simple calories-in-calories-out model and is eating the same food he normally does, but is reducing the portions. Kevin is more traditional. He's going all out in a very determined way, eating fresh salads and vegetables, working out at the gym and going on long brisk walks. However being too zealous can let cravings creep in. It takes a lot of willpower to beat them. In the end my prime time shadow Kevin the psychic wins by a big margin; would I have managed to do the as well as he did?... Do I give a shit?... I've made some bad decisions in my life, but refusing to be featured on Weighing up the Enemy was not one of them. As I said in my original review, I detect no direct conformist propaganda in this programme, but all the same, it is still distracting the people from what's important and focusing our minds on matters of no real importance, to quote Silent Weapons for a Quiet War. However I think there was an attempt at anti-benefit claimants incitement in Episode 3, but it didn't work. Debs ended up finding common ground with Wendy and they became close friends, see: http://www.channel4.com/programmes/weighing-up-the-enemy/on-demand/59354-003. I wonder who'll be in the fifth episode, probably a Glasgow Rangers supporter vs a Celtic fan; or is that the end of the series?