I have a prejudice against movie remakes. This partly
because it frustrates me that Hollywood has so lost its creative spirit that
they can no longer think of new stories; and also because remakes, with a few exceptions,
are far worse than their originals. I'm a big fan of the 1990 psychological
horror film Flatliners and I've just
watched its 2017 remake by Neils Arden Oplev; and I was impressed. Source: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2039338/.
The plot is pretty much the same; a group of medical students decide to
research the near-death experience phenomenon by putting themselves into
cardiac arrest. This is totally unrealistic and would be far too dangerous ever
to work in real life, but both films allow me to suspend my disbelief quite
well. After their experiments the students suffer terrifying ordeals in which
manifestations of people they know attack them and cause them to have
nightmarish visions. Only two of the four students see people who are dead. In
those cases the students killed the people, but the acts were of negligence
rather than malice. The two other experimenters are haunted by living people
who they both harmed on purpose. It seems that the experiment released a tulpa like physical monster from within
the experimenters based on their own guilt. They all badly mistreated people
they knew in the past, either deliberately or through neglect, and feel very
sore about it. The two whose victims were living escaped their fate by
apologizing to them. One of the characters is killed by her inner demon. Both
films star Kiefer Sutherland. In the original he plays the lead experimenter
who is haunted by the manifestation of a boy he bullied to death as a child. In
the remake he is the dean of the medical school. It is quite common for remakes
to include a cast member from the original, usually in a different role. In
fact Peter Jackson tried to bring in an elderly Fay Wray for his 2006 King Kong, but she died just before
production. That King Kong is one of
the exceptions to remakes being worse than the originals and I'd say the same
for the 2017 Flatliners. The 2017 one
is actually better in some ways, mostly due to improvements in special effects.
It also involves the experimenters using a PET scanner to examine their brains
while they're having their NDE's, indicating that they do not eliminate the
brain function hypothesis. It's an interesting new angle. However, despite
their foundational objective, the characters, and therefore the film's theme,
never really go into detail about their primary subject matter, the NDE itself;
although there is a brief attempt in the original. I'm fascinated by the NDE
mystery and it came up on the most recent Third Rail Radio, which led me to
want to watch this film, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2021/04/third-rail-radio-programme-103.html.
See here for more background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/10/return-from-dead.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/10/new-research-on-brain-at-death.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/10/proof-of-life-after-death.html.
See here for more background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/10/return-from-dead.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/10/new-research-on-brain-at-death.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/10/proof-of-life-after-death.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment