The groundbreaking revelations by the
US
government regarding UFO's in the last few years,
http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/07/new-york-times-ufo-livestream.html,
have inspired numerous questions that up until now have been purely academic.
What on earth... or off it... are we seeing in this footage? The most obvious
answer is artefacts of an extraterrestrial civilization. The objects are not
birds, clouds or fish, so they have to be artificial. Yet they are unlike any
vehicle made by the hand of man. However, it would be more accurate to say that
they are unlike any vehicle made by the hand of man
that we have been told about. Could the objects we see flitting
above the ocean waves actually be secret technology, either from the
United
States or another country? That question is
not original; in fact it is currently very fashionable. It is not recent
either; it was a possibility explored during the "foo-fighters"
sightings from 1942 when World War II bomber squadrons reported being accompanied
to and from their attack runs by strange luminous spheres that could easily outrun
and outmanoeuvre the bombers and their escorts. Were the balls of light
Hitler's new super-weapon? (Hitler did in fact have super-weapons under
construction at the time the war ended, but that's a separate story.) The same
question came up during the Cold War when jet fighters encountered the same
kind of phenomenon. It turns out that both sides in the east-west standoff were
reporting the same mysterious experiences and were wondering whether it was a
secret technology made by the other. What the witnesses describe throughout
history is remarkably similar to what we see in the "Tic-Tac",
"Go Fast" and "Gimbal" footage. A new video has been published by the Zohar
Entertainment Group entitled
Response to New
York Times UFO Disclosure. Whose Are Those UFOs? It features a rare on-screen
appearance by my old mate Steve Mera. He says we cannot rule out the
possibility that what we are seeing from the AATIP disclosure is our own secret
engineering. Steve notices that the four strange dog-leg appendages underneath
the Tic-Tac UAP resemble pitot tubes. These are part of a standard aeroplane that
diverts some of the outside airflow inside so it can measure its airspeed. There
are also patent documents circulating that seem to be designs for the kinds of
craft that could match the capabilities of the UAP's, see here for more
details:
https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/07/tr3b-to-be-declassified.html.
Could it be that what was revealed by the TTSA is actually a series of
elaborate drills in which the
Nimitz
battle group was pitted against
America's
own advanced technology? The ships in the fleet had recently been overhauled
and had new electronics and sensors installed. It would be necessary to put
them through their paces. However, the US Navy already has numerous methods for
doing this; in fact it constantly engages in exercises, research and development
missions. An additional reason would be necessary for a totally new form of adversary
to be entered into the routine. (If that reason exists then that in itself
would require fantastic explanation.) I'm not sure if the USS
Nimitz and its fleet had a live-fire
capability on this operation, but if it did then that is a very hazardous situation
because people could get killed if something goes wrong. This is one of the
reasons Sacha Christie's "time and motion" theory to explain the
Rendlesham Forest Incident cannot be true, see here for details:
https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2010/08/2nd-annual-expolitics-expo-leeds-2010.html.
If these objects really were the product of human secret science then they are
presumably still secret. It is true that governments can indeed keep weapons
developments covert until such time as it is considered acceptable to release
them into the public domain. For example, the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk attack
jet, the so called "stealth fighter", was developed during the late
1970's, but kept strictly classified until 1988. However in the case of the
foo-fighters that time period is now almost eighty years. Is that realistic? Despite
this, there is another reason to suspect that the TTSA's scoop might be some of
our own machines. I spoke to a man about this matter who knows a lot about
aircraft and used to be in the Royal Air Force; and he pointed out the word
"slave" that is visible in the gun camera display of the footage. In
pilots' parlance "slave" means a drone. Were the gimbal, Tic-Tac and
Go Fast objects unmanned aerial vehicles made by a defence contractor working
either for the
US
or another nation? Source:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bcs4dNB6nA4.
I have no absolute answers to this conundrum. The solution
might come with further study, declassifications or leaks. Until then we can
only make educated guesses. One thing I have noticed in the last few years,
since the 2017 bombshell, is the emergence of a clique of people who think that
to disbelieve in the extraterrestrial explanation for the TTSA revelations is
something very prestigious. These people have formed a community where, I am
dismayed to say, a lot of mutual back-slapping goes on, along with a condescending
sense of distain for people like me who do not share their views and keep the possibility
of ET intervention open. In this way they are very similar to the "MBA-ers"
of psychical research, see:
https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2013/09/andrew-copson-mba.html
or the anti-David Icke brigade, see:
https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2015/10/is-it-cool-to-be-anti-icke.html.
These people seem to regard themselves as some kind of superior breed of
ultra-pragmatic hero merely because they've chosen to postulate that the pilots
did not see aliens. Anybody who disagrees with them to any degree is nothing
but a "wide-eyed believer!" with all the scientific acumen of a Tolkienian
elf. I must make it clear that I do not include Steve Mera as part of this
tendency, but I have encountered others who definitely are. Somebody left a
comment when I first raised this subject that said: "These craft are ours!
Period!" No way to question that in the frame they set then. The same
person also used the words: "Get over it!"
Get over it? That's what you say to a child who still believes in
Santa Claus. These people, whom I've christened "They're not aliens!" posers, may turn out to be factually correct. Then again they may turn out to
be factually wrong. But while we're living with uncertainly at this time, I
think you can learn a lot about somebody by whether they respond to the
challenge by being honest and rational about their speculations, people who simply
want to get to the truth; or people who are just using this quandary as an
excuse to stoke their own egos and lord it over other people. I do accept that
the UAP's might turn out to be man-made, but I also think they might not. If
this disqualifies me for admittance into the Patronizing Alien Disbelievers Supreme
Supermen Society, then I'll live with that.
