Nimitz UFO's- Aliens or Ours?

The groundbreaking revelations by the US government regarding UFO's in the last few years, http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2020/07/new-york-times-ufo-livestream.html, have inspired numerous questions that up until now have been purely academic. What on earth... or off it... are we seeing in this footage? The most obvious answer is artefacts of an extraterrestrial civilization. The objects are not birds, clouds or fish, so they have to be artificial. Yet they are unlike any vehicle made by the hand of man. However, it would be more accurate to say that they are unlike any vehicle made by the hand of man that we have been told about. Could the objects we see flitting above the ocean waves actually be secret technology, either from the United States or another country? That question is not original; in fact it is currently very fashionable. It is not recent either; it was a possibility explored during the "foo-fighters" sightings from 1942 when World War II bomber squadrons reported being accompanied to and from their attack runs by strange luminous spheres that could easily outrun and outmanoeuvre the bombers and their escorts. Were the balls of light Hitler's new super-weapon? (Hitler did in fact have super-weapons under construction at the time the war ended, but that's a separate story.) The same question came up during the Cold War when jet fighters encountered the same kind of phenomenon. It turns out that both sides in the east-west standoff were reporting the same mysterious experiences and were wondering whether it was a secret technology made by the other. What the witnesses describe throughout history is remarkably similar to what we see in the "Tic-Tac", "Go Fast" and "Gimbal" footage.  A new video has been published by the Zohar Entertainment Group entitled Response to New York Times UFO Disclosure. Whose Are Those UFOs? It features a rare on-screen appearance by my old mate Steve Mera. He says we cannot rule out the possibility that what we are seeing from the AATIP disclosure is our own secret engineering. Steve notices that the four strange dog-leg appendages underneath the Tic-Tac UAP resemble pitot tubes. These are part of a standard aeroplane that diverts some of the outside airflow inside so it can measure its airspeed. There are also patent documents circulating that seem to be designs for the kinds of craft that could match the capabilities of the UAP's, see here for more details: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/07/tr3b-to-be-declassified.html. Could it be that what was revealed by the TTSA is actually a series of elaborate drills in which the Nimitz battle group was pitted against America's own advanced technology? The ships in the fleet had recently been overhauled and had new electronics and sensors installed. It would be necessary to put them through their paces. However, the US Navy already has numerous methods for doing this; in fact it constantly engages in exercises, research and development missions. An additional reason would be necessary for a totally new form of adversary to be entered into the routine. (If that reason exists then that in itself would require fantastic explanation.) I'm not sure if the USS Nimitz and its fleet had a live-fire capability on this operation, but if it did then that is a very hazardous situation because people could get killed if something goes wrong. This is one of the reasons Sacha Christie's "time and motion" theory to explain the Rendlesham Forest Incident cannot be true, see here for details: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2010/08/2nd-annual-expolitics-expo-leeds-2010.html. If these objects really were the product of human secret science then they are presumably still secret. It is true that governments can indeed keep weapons developments covert until such time as it is considered acceptable to release them into the public domain. For example, the Lockheed F-117 Nighthawk attack jet, the so called "stealth fighter", was developed during the late 1970's, but kept strictly classified until 1988. However in the case of the foo-fighters that time period is now almost eighty years. Is that realistic? Despite this, there is another reason to suspect that the TTSA's scoop might be some of our own machines. I spoke to a man about this matter who knows a lot about aircraft and used to be in the Royal Air Force; and he pointed out the word "slave" that is visible in the gun camera display of the footage. In pilots' parlance "slave" means a drone. Were the gimbal, Tic-Tac and Go Fast objects unmanned aerial vehicles made by a defence contractor working either for the US or another nation? Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bcs4dNB6nA4.

I have no absolute answers to this conundrum. The solution might come with further study, declassifications or leaks. Until then we can only make educated guesses. One thing I have noticed in the last few years, since the 2017 bombshell, is the emergence of a clique of people who think that to disbelieve in the extraterrestrial explanation for the TTSA revelations is something very prestigious. These people have formed a community where, I am dismayed to say, a lot of mutual back-slapping goes on, along with a condescending sense of distain for people like me who do not share their views and keep the possibility of ET intervention open. In this way they are very similar to the "MBA-ers" of psychical research, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2013/09/andrew-copson-mba.html or the anti-David Icke brigade, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2015/10/is-it-cool-to-be-anti-icke.html. These people seem to regard themselves as some kind of superior breed of ultra-pragmatic hero merely because they've chosen to postulate that the pilots did not see aliens. Anybody who disagrees with them to any degree is nothing but a "wide-eyed believer!" with all the scientific acumen of a Tolkienian elf. I must make it clear that I do not include Steve Mera as part of this tendency, but I have encountered others who definitely are. Somebody left a comment when I first raised this subject that said: "These craft are ours! Period!" No way to question that in the frame they set then. The same person also used the words: "Get over it!" Get over it? That's what you say to a child who still believes in Santa Claus. These people, whom I've christened "They're not aliens!" posers, may turn out to be factually correct. Then again they may turn out to be factually wrong. But while we're living with uncertainly at this time, I think you can learn a lot about somebody by whether they respond to the challenge by being honest and rational about their speculations, people who simply want to get to the truth; or people who are just using this quandary as an excuse to stoke their own egos and lord it over other people. I do accept that the UAP's might turn out to be man-made, but I also think they might not. If this disqualifies me for admittance into the Patronizing Alien Disbelievers Supreme Supermen Society, then I'll live with that.

See here for background: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2018/06/programme-289-podcast-steve-mera.html.

And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.

And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/07/aatip-was-not-closed-in-2012.html.

And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/07/happy-world-disclosure-day-2020.html.