Richard Dolan has produced a video and later on has a debate
with Bryce Zabel where he suggests that the AATIP TTSA Disclosure train might
have ground to a halt. The events after December 2017 have made Dolan rethink
many of his earlier positions on UFO Disclosure. He used to believe, as I did,
that Disclosure could only be followed by a massive social upheaval and
political chaos. This is what I describe in my 2016 book Roswell Rising- a Novel of Disclosure (available at all good
bookshops now! http://hpanwo-bb.blogspot.com/2016/08/roswell-rising-is-here.html).
However the TTSA and AATIP revelations have called that into question. The
pre-Disclosure world could be peacefully and systematically dismantled instead
of collapsing catastrophically. Yet, has that disassembly process currently reached
a point where it can no longer progress for the time being? If not then why
hasn't the series of bombshells that I've been covering since 2017 led to an
avalanche of more questions? "What about Roswell ?"
"What about Rendlesham Forest ?"
"What about the Phoenix
Lights?" etc. After all, we know that in all three of those cases, decisive
evidence was suppressed by the government. Why has the New York Times not pursued this trail like a bloodhound? They seem
to be inexplicably dragging their heels. In fact, it is frustrating that the
issue was not the leading story in every newspaper on earth. Even the
coronavirus should not be enough to page-two it. Why the wearisome and banal
contention about "Are they Chinese?" "Are they drones?" etc,
which makes no sense? In the sourced debate with Dolan, Zabel actually echoes
my own thoughts, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/08/nimitz-ufos-aliens-or-ours.html.
Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MmF4HIbgI2w
and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhrVgptTaK8.
Richard Dolan thinks we have hit a ceiling. Yes, the Truth
Embargo has lost some ground, but it has successfully regrouped at a fallback
position which states: "Yes there are UFO's and we don't know what they
are... but that's all!" No declassification of saucers and bodies; those
remain conspiracy theories. That would be a disappointment, because it's not
much more of a concession than the ones they made in the 1960's towards the end
of Project Blue Book. However, Bryce Zabel sees this stagnation as a pause
rather than an ending. He expects that there are currently behind the scenes
meetings in editors' offices about how they can handle the upcoming information
the Times is sitting on; and also
whether they can poach Leslie Kean and Ralph Blumenthal for their own publications.
Zabel draws on his considerable experience and training in journalism to
develop this more optimistic assessment. He believes that the aggregated direction
movement is still forwards and that movement could accelerate at any moment. One
thing history teaches us is that the future is fairly unpredictable. The TTSA
board have been reposting Zabel's blog articles, including this one where he claims
unequivocally that Roswell was an
alien crash-retrieval, see: https://medium.com/on-the-trail-of-the-saucers/yes-we-have-ufo-crash-wreckage-e1b2b2b03097.
I don't know which one of these two authors of AD- After Disclosure is correct; obviously I hope Zabel is. We will
just have to wait and see. I sometimes think we UFOlogists are being greedy and
inpatient. So much has been achieved in the last few years so quickly that we
have lost the ability to admire the ground we have covered. It's worth
imagining that we are currently living before 2017 and somebody comes up to us
and says: "Hey, guess what! You know all those pilots who have been
reporting UFO's since the 1940's? Well, the government is about to admit some
of them were right and publish official confirmation; even video footage! It
will be so incredible that even the mainstream media will cover it as their
fourth or fifth story!" My response would be: "No way! That's way too
good to be true!" Yet it is true.
It has happened. What can I say is
about to happen in the future that will not make you feel the same way when it
actually does?
See here for
background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
"We have detected UFOs that cannot be explained by known technology...but they're not UFOs." The truth is whatever they mean it to be.
ReplyDeleteLaurence. LOL that reminds me of a Giorgio Tsoukalos meme I saw: "I'm not saying it's aliens... but it's aliens!"
ReplyDeleteOT: look like Q is Jim Watkins (or one of his cronies) Evidence is pretty conclusive...
ReplyDeletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dDFWEbopyo
Hi Anon. This is not the first time Defango has made claims about who Q is. As it happens this is the third major supposed revelation of Q's identify. Either two of them are lying or ALL of them are lying. This is not to mention more less detailed nominations that are too numerous to count. What's more it cannot be disputed that there are lots of "clowns" muddling the situation up. I thought the whole point of 8Chan was that it used about a 20 level proxy server anyway so it gave users privacy. I found out from dealing with trolls on the HPANWO Forum that sometimes the same IP comes up with separate members. When I tried to get rid of trolls by banning IP addresses I ended up accidentally banning legitimate members because they were entering from the same proxies. Also it is no surprise Watkins owns a QAnon aggregator, seeing as 8chan is Q's principle home. I would check to see if Watkins owns some of the Q merch lines too. Of course he's going to try and cash in on his board's most infamous user. That's a natural opportunity! From what's in this video, this is not conclusive evidence that Jim Watkins is Q. I'll have a look through the other sources though. Have you ever wondered why Q has endured so long? Look at how it has risen above the usual chaotic nonsense you get on the chans. Look at my own publications on the subject.
ReplyDelete