Sunday, 18 January 2026

Take Aliens to the Bank!

 
The term "UFO crash" might take on a whole new meaning if the latest report by a financial pundit is correct. Helen McCaw spent ten years at the Bank of England serving as a financial security analyst. She has recently sent a letter to the governor of the Bank, Andrew Bailey, warning him that the financial system must be prepared for the impact of ET Disclosure. That's odd because skeptics have been telling us for years that if real aliens made contact it would be no big deal. I'm inclined to trust a banker rather than a skepper because if the skepper gets it wrong their livelihood is not threatened. What Ms McCaw is referring to is of course what we in UFOlogy call "ontological shock". She fears it could trigger a stock market crash and a new depression, with the resulting effects of unemployment, industrial recession and civil unrest. She envisages all the usual tropes of long queues at the petrol station, soup kitchens and trolleys full of toilet paper. She heeds the banking sector not to "dismiss talk of alien life and snigger about 'little green men'." She was never previously interested in UFO's until she began following the post-2017 new Disclosure movement. She is writing a chapter all about it for a book edited by Dr Alex Wendt, an expert on international security at Ohio State University. I wonder if they'd like me to write ones of the others! Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ms9JO3tsRAU. This is another interesting example of somebody who should not normally be thinking about UFO's actually doing so. There are numerous others. There is obviously a burgeoning awareness that something serious is going on. Ironically, what Ms McCaw fears could be just what the financial doctor ordered, at least, according to Paul Krugman. The Nobel Prize-winning economist recently announced that an alien invasion could be the perfect solution to economic slowdown because it would cause fiscal stimulus, encouraging the government to engage in more regulation and splash out on spending, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/10/alien-invasion-to-save-economy.html. The Bank of England have not commented, but it wouldn't surprise me if they have taken on board what McCaw has said; and she's probably not the only one. Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel also said the financial world would be badly affected by Disclosure and it even comes up in my own Roswell novel trilogy, see: https://hpanwo-bb.blogspot.com/2016/08/roswell-rising-is-here.html. However, like all the upheavals that Disclosure would cause, this one can also be overcome; and what lies on the other side of that barrier would make the effort worthwhile. Maintaining the Truth Embargo for much longer would be many times worse. When the day of Disclosure happens, especially if it is official and willing Disclosure, it will take place on a Friday afternoon after the stock markets have all closed so that the world has the entire weekend to get their heads round it before the doors of Wall Street and the Square Mile reopen the following Monday morning. As I write these words it is Sunday so we have six days. As the saying goes: people get ready!

4 comments:

Missing Trillions said...

Hello again Ben. Yes, I'm sure the markets will have already run through this scenario hypothetically and considered the likely effect on prices of every type of asset class. It will be bad news for everything that's now an easy source of profit, in particular any stock related to the supply of energy (not just the oil industry). The fine detail might be as important as the broad theme. For example if contact with an ET civilisation makes things that are rare much more abundant, the concept of gold as an age old store of wealth could be challenged.

I think to prevent this happening the state will monopolise contact even after a formal disclosure is given, perhaps spinning aliens as a likely threat or as a phenomenon needing careful evaluation by the usual "experts". That's why the Chase video mentioned earlier might be relevant, with new forms of isolation, social distancing and restrictions on movement dreamed up on all sorts of pretexts to supposedly keep us "safe". Personally I'm struggling to find the motivation to interact with people and just can't find the energy to explain to people how I see things, so isolation would be quite easy and comfortable.

Off topic, I'm perplexed by Trump's fixation with acquiring Greenland which seems to offer no benefit in terms of national security or to his legacy or administration. I've seen two things which might explain it:
1. This from 7 months ago seems more relevant right now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awml9Z6eF_M
2. Maybe he is intent on knocking NATO on the head and it provides a way of circumventing opposition from the Uniparty and Deep State (OK so I admit I'm sounding a it 'Q-ish' with this one).

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Hi MT. One thing I omitted from the article, mostly because it would have made it three times as long, is the fake alien invasion, bluebeam scenario. Mind you, I'm sure you realize that is at the back of my mind and this might be a part of it. The energy issue is central as you know. As Gerald Caxton said in Roswell Rising "India and China dominating the world!" etc Gold is like anything else. Abundance = inflation. This is why King Midas would have had a very disappointing time. I noticed Chase didn't actually name the crisis he was talking about, or left it open to possibility. Maybe aliens are it! (Could I answer your Greenland point on the next 3rd Rail, hopefully tomorrow? I'm planning a feature about it.)

Anonymous said...

Nothing Trump does makes logical sense beyond that of a small child's fixation with liking taking things or being so thin skinned if slighted in any way will seek to take revenge. Greenland for example. Not needed by the US for security as they are free to have as many bases and military on it as they require. Not needed for a 'golden dome' missile defence as this is space based with satellites. Not needed for minerals/oil as this is currently too cost prohibitive to access and Greenland is happy to licence any explorations/rights to any country including the US (of the last licence issuing only 1 of the 80 available was applied for by a US company). Not wanting Russia 'as a neighbour' Maybe somebody should point out Alaska to Trump. Increased danger from Russia and China from global warming opening up sea lanes. Well considering Trump claims global warming is a hoax that's odd now isn't it? Claiming Denmark isn't defending Greenland or meeting it's obligations. Being part of NATO means collective defence. Denmark has increased and has more Military than the US which has consistently decreased it's personnel and presence on Greenland. Finally we get to the 'real' reason outlined by Trump in his letter to Norway 'you didn't vote for me to get a Nobel Peace prize' therefore 'I'm not obligated to peace'. It would be laughable except it's true.

Ben Emlyn-Jones said...

Hi Anon. Could I answer that in the next Third Rail Radio episode, hopefully today?