A few days ago I wrote an article entitled Don't Call it "Wales "! which has generated a lot of
feedback, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/10/dont-call-it-wales.html.
I have had three original comments under the article itself plus entire threads
of replies on the Facebook post, on my own timeline and the two groups I shared
it with. Despite this, at the time of writing, late afternoon on Friday the
4th, you can see that according to my Blogger stats illustrated above this
article has had only forty-seven views. The afternoon after I posted it, it was
showing just thirty-three, even though most of the comments had been posted by
then. As I say in the background articles below, I think Blogger is seriously
undercounting my viewing figures, probably on purpose. They are fabricating a
diminished Google footprint for me and are throwing it in my face. This is more
than just shadowbanning; it is trying to make me think I have an even smaller
reach than the one they are trying to engineer. Silicon Valley
has overplayed its hand though. I've always been suspicious of my stats, but
this is the first time they have ever arranged viewing figures for me that are
lower than the number of comments I've had. Do they think I'm stupid? Did they
think I wouldn't notice? Do they really think I'm just going to give up? Do
they really think I'm going to believe these figures and say: "What's the
point of me writing these articles when no bugger reads them?" Not a
chance! I now have effective proof that my audience is far larger than my
Blogger statistics are claming and so I shall continue to produce content for
all those people to read, watch and listen to.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/01/hpanwo-safari-warning.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/01/fake-stats.html.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/01/hpanwo-safari-warning.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/01/fake-stats.html.
2 comments:
Maybe Blogger has a staunch Celt in its ranks! But joking aside, I agree this looks odd. I visited the article at least 4 times myself, to read it and then look at the comments.
LOL, Anon. If only this element was confined to my most politically incorrect posts! I think if you visit more than once that only counts as one view, but if you do so from different devices then those count as separate. It is supposed to detect the IP address of the client linking to the server. However, clearly I have had more than 47 unique views. All my publications are ratioed like this.
Post a Comment