Peter Robbins has been interviewed on The ADX Files radio
show with Alyson Dunlop, see: https://www.spreaker.com/user/enemywithinradio/adx-99-peter-robbins.
He repeated a lot of the same points he made in previous interviews, for
example: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/05/peter-robbins-on-podcast-ufo-may-2018.html.
However his discussion about Larry Warren was his longest yet and he and Alyson
raise some additional points. The first part of the programme is about 9/11 of which
we have just passed the seventeenth anniversary. Peter is a native New Yorker and
so it has hurt him very badly. This is something he and Larry still share. Despite
claims to the contrary, Larry did visit Ground Zero personally and I'll say more
about that in the future. Peter then explains in a tone of great authority that
Larry was given a place to stay when he was homeless by Sacha Christie and her
family, and he abused their hospitality and kindness. This is what inspired Sacha
to revise the material in Left at East
Gate. However, Peter did not live with Sacha at the same time; he is merely
relaying Sacha's family's side of the story. Larry describes the situation very
differently. How can we judge? Of course Peter has experience of Larry through
his own independent relationship with him, as he explains in intricate detail, and
considerable extent, in his "War and Peace" statement, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/06/the-larry-warren-controversy-part-16.html.
However, again Larry's side of the story is totally different and if we
automatically believe Peter or Larry we are making a call on a personal interaction
we are not a part of. It's impossible to do that correctly or fairly. Peter says
that "(Larry) lied easily,
convincingly, in written form and to your face; in spoken form etc. Larry is
brilliant at what he does, which is confabulate, exaggerate, make things up,
and I bought it." However all the actual evidence of Larry's supposed
deception does not stand up to scrutiny, as I have detailed in my research
project on the subject, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/12/is-larry-warren-fraud.html;
also see background links below. Peter also claims that Ronnie Dugdale has
backed up Sacha's conclusion about Larry through his own research; however I
have not seen this. The first I heard Dugdale even mention this subject was in
the comments boxes of Sacha's blog.
After half an hour of the show, Peter then settles down into
his list of objections. He complains about the fact that Larry Warren insisted on
sending his manuscript for Left at East
Gate in handwritten form when Peter asked him to type it double-spaced. I
don't see why that is relevant to the authenticity of Larry's story, but it
does inadvertently address a separate point. Larry has enormous trouble using a
typewriter or a computer word processor application. He even needs instructions
to log into his email. Yet despite this, his detractors are convinced that he
is some kind of genius at producing faked photographs of himself with John
Lennon and other rock stars. Tino has made a video with Larry countering the
smears regarding Larry's relationship with the music industry, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2SLMYr9vI3I.
Alyson then compares people who support Larry to members of a religious cult,
which is ironic seeing as the opposition to the attacks on Larry has been
completely based in logic and reason; at least from the two principle investigators,
Gary Heseltine and myself. Peter then brings up Capel Green, the upcoming documentary, and claims it will "contaminate" the Rendlesham
Forest Incident. How does he know? He has never seen the film; nobody has. I
think his statement counts as yet another precognitive review. Peter says that
just because Larry knew where the landing site in the field it does not prove
he was there. He mentions Adrian Bustinza and it is Sacha's assertion that Bustinza
saw the UFO and Larry merely purloined his story. However, there are distinct
differences between the accounts of the two airmen, especially when it comes to
the debriefing. I think the two stories sound like separate accounts of two
witnesses who experienced the same incident. The differences in how they were
treated afterwards might be because of their difference in rank. See here for important
details: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/07/ben-emlyn-jones-on-ghostly-hour-podcast.html.
Since that interview we now know that there is a new witness who supports
Larry's testimony, Steve Longero, who spoke at the recent UFO Truth Magazine
Conference, see here for the HPANWO TV reportage: (coming soon). Just before
the halfway break, Alyson says that she thinks Gary Heseltine is proofreading
Larry's social media contributions. I'm not sure exactly what point she is
trying to make here. Is that a bad thing? Larry's writing, especially when he's
using a keyboard, is full of mistakes in spelling, grammar and punctuation.
It's possible he's asked somebody to correct them; maybe it's Gary or maybe
somebody else. I don't think it's relevant unless the editor is changing the
meaning of Larry's text and I've not heard him complain about that. The next
topic of conversation is Larry's alleged hawking of counterfeit rock-and-roll memorabilia.
We are still waiting for Larry to be arrested and questioned over that very
serious alleged offence. Like all the other accusations of criminal activity made
by his opponents, Larry has never been questioned, let alone prosecuted, for
any of them. If even some of these allegations were true, Larry would be in
jail by now. One new piece of information Peter tables is that one of the fake
items Larry traded was an autograph of the punk-rock singer songwriter Helen
Wheels. This is a personal affront because she is Peter's sister and she died
in 2000 aged just fifty-one. Has Peter been to the police about this? If not,
why not? Do people think Larry has some kind of immunity from prosecution as if
he were a defecting spy? It's time to get real! Peter claims that auction houses
cover up frauds like this because they're afraid of a scandal; they pay off the
victims etc. I doubt that this is possible with fraud on this scale. These are
surely criminal matters involving a
huge amount of money. Peter reckons one deal netted Larry £19,000. The Crown
Prosecution Service could never let Sotheby's or Christie's (an ironic name!)
etc take the law into their own hands, any more than they could in the case of any
other kind of fraud, such as banking embezzlement etc. How come Bernie Madoff
didn't try that, simply using his vast fortune to reimburse the people he
robbed and walk free? No way. I repeat: Larry would have been imprisoned years
ago if one word of this is true. Something does not add up with what Peter and
others are saying. As if often the case, there's a Newtonian-type reaction in
social issues. Because Larry's story is being supported by further evidence,
including new documents, a polygraph test and additional witnesses; the
opposition undergoes a distillation process. They have shrunk in number over
the last two years, but the remaining stalwarts have become more vocal and
dedicated. Nothing can change this situation. The hardcore trolls will never
change their position no matter what evidence is put before them. We can only
present the rational truth to people willing to listen. I'm pleased to relate
that this is happening; the current estimated release date for Capel Green in next spring. Peter ends
the interview by talking about his new book, a UFO anthology of incidents other
than Rendlesham Forest .
He says he wants to move on and leave Rendlesham behind, but he is showing no
signs of doing so at the moment.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/09/capel-green-update.html.
Well said Ben!
ReplyDeleteThanks, David :-)
ReplyDeleteHave you heard what Col Halt has to say about LW ? He is coming from a different angle altogether, one of actually being there & knowing those involved. Over the years Col Halt has made contact with various other people who were there at the time too, and they all agree on one thing about warren, he wasn't out there in the woods & fields ! He was in his barracks, which he shared with one of the guys who was actually out there & who told Warren about what he had seen, which is why when Warren told his mother about it he made no claim to have personally witnessed any of the events (as covered in that talk above). Which is why anything else Warren says (Capel Green) will be disinfo that pollutes the case.
ReplyDeleteD Harte