Keeping Bigfoot Secret

 

A new Bigfoot image has been captured by an "eagle cam". A CCTV camera has been set up beside the nest of bald eagles in Michigan USA. Bald eagle populations have recovered during the 21st century, but they are still an endangered species and conservationists are keeping watch over the chicks in case they are targeted by poachers. However, it picks up something else, something very unexpected. The camera is in a tree, slightly above the nest pointing downwards and the ground is about thirty feet below, out of focus in the periphery of the frame. It is on the ground that we see a distinct dark humanoid figure appear. It wanders around for a few seconds in the area, and seems to be balancing itself on fallen logs; then it wanders away out of sight. The footage has a soundtrack and you can hear the eagle chicks squeaking and the wind blowing, but the humanoid makes no sound. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r34Sqv-iblc. Obviously skeptics will say the solution is simple; the figure is a human. This is possible. The resolution is too poor to make out whether this humanoid has dark fur or is just a person wearing dark clothes. As I said, the lens is focused on the nest. It would be easier if we knew where the nest was, however I expect the conservationists want to keep its location secret. I'd be curious to know if they found any footprints where the creature was walking, or hair or droppings etc.
 
The original news article on this subject had another one linked to it which asked a deep and interesting question; is there a cover-up of Bigfoot? The presence of an elusive large unknown primate living in North America is, I think, proven beyond reasonable doubt. Of course there are many skeptics who doubt the existence of Bigfoot and until now the question has been fairly one-dimensional. It's a dispute over evidence or alleged lack of it. This makes Bigfoot very different to the UFO issue because with UFO's there is a distinct political angle; by that I mean government suppression through media propaganda and crash-retrievals etc out of distinct economic and sociological motives, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html. However, could those same motives also apply to Bigfoot? The author of this eye-opening article, called "Tammy", thinks so. She describes a forest fire in Nevada in which firemen rescued a Bigfoot. The primate was treated for its burns, but then government officials turned up and took it away to an unknown location. The fire-fighters were warned not to talk about what they had seen. I've reported on another similar incident myself, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2020/02/bigfoot-body-taken.html. In this HPANWO Radio interview, Darcy Weir describes another such event at a logging camp in Canada, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2015/10/programme-158-podcast-darcy-weir.html. This is a sinister development. What these stories describe is similar what happens during a UFO crash-retrieval like Roswell, Varginha, Pentyrch etc. Why would this happen? Why would the Deep State suppress the existence of Bigfoot? Surely from their point of view it is neither here nor there whether the existence of a big upright simian is real or not. Tammy believes there are several reasons. Firstly, all the mainstream scientists would have to admit they were wrong and, as we know, many of them don't like doing that; including most of the most influential ones. To quote Arthur C Clarke: "When an elderly and conservative scientist says something is not true, he is almost certainly wrong." So is the cover-up totally about some conceited boffins saving face? Of course not; there's more. The government might have a benevolent reason just like their care for the bald eagle; species protection. They may be concerned that should it be publicly acknowledged that Bigfoot exists, Americans being Americans, many of them would head out into the woods with their guns to try and be the first to bag one for the shelf. (This incidentally is another reason why you should never try to play a prank by dressing up as a Bigfoot. Somebody might shoot you not knowing that you are a human in disguise.) The government fear a Bigfoot cull by hunters, and we don't know how many Bigfoots (or is that Bigfeet?) exist. Their revelation could be the instrument of their extinction. Tammy also thinks, probably correctly, that some industries would be effected; logging especially. Even today, with the existence of the creature disputed, some governments are tabling legislation to protect Bigfoot. In Washington State you will be prosecuted if you kill a Bigfoot and in Oklahoma Bigfoot killing is restricted to a season. Tourism and that most popular of American activities, outdoor sports and recreation, may also be curtailed. Source: https://exemplore.com/cryptids/Why-Would-Government-Officials-Want-to-Keep-BigfootSasquatch-a-Secret. I would like to add that another answer could lie in the field of strategic psychological warfare. It could be detrimental, from the government's position, for humans to know we share this planet with such creatures. Upright locomotion is rare in the animal kingdom. Humans are the only known living primate which walks like that. Our closest known relative, the chimpanzee, walks on all fours because it is primarily a tree dweller. The mass psychological and cultural effect of Bigfoot, Yowie or the Yeti etc being real could cause people to think and feel in a way our psychological lords and masters do not want us to. It might give us a subversive affinity with the natural world. Therefore Bigfoot researchers may need to take the same precautions that UFOlogists do. Be prepared for a cover-up the moment you make your report. Collect evidence and keep it secret; photos, DNA samples, spoor plaster-casts etc. Could the same apply to other mysteries, such as the afterlife? I've raised that question incompletely before, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/01/the-discovery-film-review.html; perhaps it needs a dedicated article and/or video in the future.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2018/02/programme-269-podcast-glen-vaudrey.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/05/dreaming-saucers-deborah-hatswell.html.

Colon gets a Parcel

 

Something strange happened last weekend. I was attending a Sunday social at the Bases Project (sorry, I didn't film anything for it) and was in the Bases Project Headquarters. Miles had been away for a week and I was house-sitting until he came home. I noticed that a parcel had been delivered addressed to "Dr Colon Woollyford". Sounds familiar? It had been in the post a long time, almost two months! Well, it had a second class stamp on it so what do you expect? Anyway my good friend, comrade and space brother Colin Woolford turned up the next day and we assumed that the parcel was meant for him. Miles decided that the piece of correspondence should be opened with some formality and it should be recorded on camera for posterity. I, Ben F. Luent Jones was honoured to play the role of master-of-ceremonies for the momentous event.
Here it is: https://www.bitchute.com/video/qEkcFFjv3FIR/.
And: https://rumble.com/v1r2wda-dr-colon-wollyford-receives-a-package.html.
Alien Autopsy is actually quite a good film. Ant and Dec are not regular denizens of the fictional big screen, but they adapt to it very well. It tells the story of the famous alien autopsy footage mystery in the form of a dramatized comedy. Colin has radical opinions on the subject of the Santilli film and its true origins. He has studied it in great detail as his speciality. He and I differ quite a bit; but, to be honest, I've come round to wondering if he has a point. Certainly there has been a real alien autopsy film in circulation at some point in the late 1980's and if the Santilli film is not it then the real one was very similar. It begs the question of where the producers got the idea from.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2017/10/alien-autopsy-hoax.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2017/07/roswell-70-colin-woolford.html.
And: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2019/08/programme-336-podcast-alien-autopsy.html.
And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.

UFO Truth Magazine- Issue 57

 

UFO Truth Magazine Issue 57 is now available. It can be purchased on this page as a single copy, but please subscribe and save money if you want to read it regularly, see: https://www.ufotruthmagazine.co.uk.
Issue 57 includes an article in my column entitled Friendly Aliens.
 
Also you will find in Issue 57: a report on the San Marino UAP Symposium, more mysteries in Rendlesham Forest, Birmingham airport buzzed by a UFO and much much more.
Also in this HPANWO Show programme I interview the UFO Truth Magazine's editor Gary Heseltine: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2021/07/programme-427-podcast-gary-heseltine.html.
See here for details on UFO Truth Magazine Issue 56: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/09/ufo-truth-magazine-issue-56.html.

The BBC on RDH

 

The Deep State conspirators have launched a new tactic for suppressing dissent: outsourced lawfare. Instead of passing legislation or using slippery new courts to ban it directly, they stir up litigious paramilitaries to crush dissidents by ruining their character and livelihood in civil lawsuits. This was something I predicted would happen after the recent Alex Jones case, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/08/alex-jones-in-court.html. The precedent set by what was done to Alex is now being applied to Richard D Hall. I knew something was wrong a few days ago when somebody asked me if Richard's YouTube channel was down. (I have not been following Richard on most social media lately because I blocked him over a personal dispute, but that's not relevant right now.) I checked and saw that it was true. At first I assumed it was another typical act of censorship by Big Tech; then I wondered if the McCann's had flagged him, or that Richard deleted the channel himself on the advice of his solicitor. Today I found out I was right first time. The BBC have their own "specialist disinformation" correspondent, Marianna Spring, who was educated at Oxford and recruited to produce establishment propaganda; there's no other word for it. She has come to the attention of HPANWO before, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/06/conspiracies-fake-news-and-false.html. Whenever you hear the terms disinformation, misinformation or fact checked from the mainstream media you can bet you're dealing with their lies. YouTube yeeted the Richplanet channel after Mzzzzzz Spring "contacted" them. She has written an article about Richard D Hall, see: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-63412651. She also has a series on Radio 4 with the title Disaster Trolls, see: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/brand/m001dn64.
 
Effective propaganda does not try to persuade rationally; instead it engenders strong emotions in the minds of its target population. It delivers eloquent rhetoric in place of fake facts. Marianna Spring's article and radio series spends almost all its time addressing the human cost of conspiracy theories with a series of profiles about how a number of people have suffered, the people who claim to be the victims of terrorist attacks or have lost loved ones in those atrocities. The merest suggestion that they are being anything other than one hundred percent honest is described by phrases like: "laughably ridiculous if they weren't so offensive and harmful!" and "Does he know how much pain he is causing the survivors of these attacks!?" Similar cant would have been unthinkable in professional journalism a few decades ago. At no point does Spring attempt to explain neither why RDH's thesis is incorrect nor why the official stories are somehow correct. It's all about drawing the reader or listener's heart, not their head, into the everyday experience of those trying to rebuild their lives after "the worst days of their lives", coping with injuries and grief. Once the reader/listener's sympathy has been sufficiently stoked, along comes the sting; the next part of the story which tells how they were abused online by people allegedly incited by the EEEEEEvil Mr Hall. Richard himself is not accused of abusing anybody personally, the same way Alex Jones wasn't, in fact neither of them have ever suggested anybody should go out and do any such thing; but in today's courts, the actions of other unrelated individuals can be somehow transformed into their culpability which is a worrying legal application. One of the radio episodes is called Sharpening the Spike. This is a strange title. It comes from the time Richard considered planting a hidden camera outside one of the alleged terror victim's homes, on public land, to see if she were telling the truth about her brain damage. This is an extreme and high risk method of investigative journalism, but I think it is legitimate for Richard to use it in this situation. He does not break the law regarding privacy and data protection etc. What's more the mainstream media do things like this all the time, and worse besides. At one point they doorstepped a Scotsman called Colin Robertson, a man who is a recovering psychiatric patient. They even invaded his garden and blackened his name to his neighbours. They then published a front page headline calling him a "vile racist", see: https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/meet-vile-vlogger-whose-racist-9586908. Will Ms Spring denounce the Daily Record in the same way she does Richard D Hall? Will she publish an interview with Robertson weeping and talking about his pain?... I doubt it. "Sharpening the spike" is a deeply potent phrase. It is reminiscent of vampire movies and implies violence. What does it refer to in this context? Why, only the workings of Richard's makeshift camera mount. It is a wooden stick that he thrust it into the ground, so it had to have a sharp end. Why, what else did you think he meant by sharpening the spike? What a crafty, dishonest and manipulative way to warp language that is! Spring also goes to see Richard at his famous market stall. Richard wisely refuses to do an interview with her. (I've been in similar situations, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/03/the-great-ufo-conspiracy-review.html). Spring blames this for her omission of the Richplanet factual side of the story; but if he had spoken to her, his position would have been edited out or distorted anyway. She accuses Richard of profiting off people's pain and misery. The notion that people like us are "just in it for the money" is hardly original. It's been falsely applied to David Icke too, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/12/david-icke-is-human.html. In the case of Richard D Hall he is a highly skilled man. He had a lucrative career as a qualified electrical engineer who once worked for Rolls Royce. He could have been a millionaire by now; but he gave all that up to produce Richaplanet.
 
In one episode of Disaster Trolls and Marianna Spring's article Neil Sanders is interviewed. No doubt he is going to get a lot of aggravation for that, but I actually think his intentions were good. He was trying to act as a positive character witness for Richard, but it won't work. This kangaroo court is not interested in anything positive. Neil has changed considerably over the last few years. He once wrote a definitive book about mind control and appeared on HPANWO Radio, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2012/11/programme-20-podcast-neil-sanders.html, but since then has descended to just a single notch above full skeppa. He was once one of Richard's "favoured few"; but today he presents a skeptic podcast with another ex-conspiracy theorist, Brent Lee, see: https://www.youtube.com/c/BrentLeeTV. This article and radio programme by Marianna Spring is not investigating anything. She is not trying to search for answers or get to the truth; or take your pick of whatever clichés of praise the conformist critics lavish her with. This is an attempt to suppress investigation into anything contrary to the establishment narrative. It is a warning shot at anybody else who may be considering a publication questioning the official story about other human crises. What the BBC hopes will happen now is Richard's reputation and livelihood will be ruined. They are banking on the cowardice and stupidity of third parties; market managers, booksellers, social media networks and sectors of the general public who will collaborate with this smear campaign unquestioningly. However, a time is coming when that essential element will no longer be so reliable. This attempt to destroy the character of Richard D Hall might be the turning point we have been waiting for. There is going to be a follow-up Panorama TV programme about Richard tonight, Halloween, which I will be reviewing in a HPANWO TV livestream, see https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/11/rdh-panorama-livestream.html.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-bb.blogspot.com/2009/01/show-some-respect.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/12/richplanet-tv-on-aatip.html.
And: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2012/08/programme-8-podcast-exopolitics-special.html.

And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/07/rdh-lawsuit-mini-portal.html.

EVP on Third Rail

 

Something strange happened while Trevor Murray and I were recording last week's episode of Third Rail Radio, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2022/10/third-rail-radio-programme-126.html. At 1.28.07 a bizarre noise can be heard on the recording. I heard it while we were recording and made a note to go back and check it at the time. Trevor and I co-host the show and we record it in advance on Skype; and I record it at my end with Skype's house recorder, but at the same time I run a backup in the form of a cheap freebie that produces a standard definition stereo track. Occasionally when we're recording, artefacts occur, such as echoes. This is mostly caused by feedback if one of us, for example, uses speakers for our audio instead of earphones. Sometimes when we hand over the dialogue or interrupt each other our tracks are distorted because the gain is high on both microphones. However, I can't find another occasion when our system causes a noise like this. I've listened to the programme again and this is the only place in the recording that it happens. The anomaly is a burbling electronic sound that to me resembles a distorted voice. It appears to utter two words that I can't make out, but I can detect a series of about half a dozen consonants and vowels. If it is a voice then it does not resemble either mine or Trevor's. The anomaly also occurs on the backup recording and, because app records in stereo, I can hear that it occurs at Trevor's end only. However Trevor was not talking at the time and if it is an echo of my own voice, how come it sounds nothing at all like my voice? The other feedback echoes are recognizable. Trevor and I were both completely alone in our respective recording rooms. We called each other again after the recording and discussed the anomaly. We decided we would bring it up in a future programme, this one: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2022/10/third-rail-radio-programme-127.html; but until then we would keep the matter private. The reason for this was that we wanted to see if any Third Rail listeners also spotted it independently. So far none of them have contacted us about it. Could this be an example of EVP, electronic voice phenomenon? If you're unfamiliar with this subject I've posted some background links below; but it is fascinating. A strange noise was picked up on one of the Mind Set Central shows too, but I can't find the episode, sorry. I'm curious to see if the anomaly repeats.
See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/10/bbc-on-evp.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2021/05/brookdale-lodge-uncovered.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2014/01/hauntings-best-evidence-by-don-philips.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2011/09/assap-seriously-strange-conference.html.

Calvine Clown's Day Off

 

See here for essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/08/calvine-ufo-photo-released.html.
And: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/08/ufo-disclosure-2022-why-now.html.
I've given Dr David Clarke a lot of stick over the years, but he really needs to be congratulated in his recent effort to restore the Calvine UFO photograph to public attention. Since his initial news drop he has managed to gain an official response from the government via his MP Louise Haigh, who is also the Shadow Secretary of State for Transport. She contacted the Ministry of Defence and received a reply from the Armed Forces and Veterans Minister James Heappey. He said the only information about this incident are the documents already available in the National Archives; this is because of its "historic nature", meaning they threw out the files that were getting too old... Do you really believe that? One of his predecessors at the MoD, Nicholas Soames, claims the incident is "of no defence significance". That's odd considering it's an unknown aircraft operating in British airspace. Heappey did not confirm or deny whether there was an RAF scramble as a result of the incident in question, but he did give this rather shady and contradictory statement: "While we are aware that the existence or otherwise of a 'secret American Aurora aircraft' was linked to this alleged event, with a number of theories suggesting that it was this aircraft that was allegedly seen, this is not a matter for the MoD, rather it would be a matter for the US Government. However, the UK Government has given no authority for any such aircraft to fly over or land in the United Kingdom and has no evidence to suggest that any such aircraft has." He refers to the theory that the Calvine photo depicts the secret US Aurora spy-plane that is said to lurk at RAF Machrihanish in Argyll, but he deals with it by washing his hands of the possibility and leaving it up to the Americans; but in the next sentence he says that such an activity has not been authorized by the UK government. Why? According to what he said before they need no permission. Which is it, Jimmy?
 
The article gets even more laughable when Dr Clarke wheels the skeppers in. Apparently somebody has solved the mystery... no kidding! Wim van Utrecht, whom I'm guessing is a Dutchman by his name, of CUFOS, says the photograph was concocted by hanging a Christmas ornament from a tree and taking the shot from a certain angle. There's only one problem, zero evidence. Meneer Utrecht has found a picture of a Yuletide bauble that looks similar and speculates that this is what the photographers did. This is another perfect example of the clown's day off fallacy. It states that any explanation that does not involve aliens must be prioritized above all others. Regardless of how absurd and baseless it might be, it wins by default simply because it does not involve aliens, through some principle that the skeptics have never explained. Conversely, any explanation that does involve aliens must be handicapped, or even ignored, regardless of whether it makes perfect sense and there is a huge amount of evidence for it, see: https://youtu.be/DFl3V4JRDns?t=2191. Source: https://drdavidclarke.co.uk/2022/10/23/the-calvine-photographs-mod-response-to-mps-questions/. I do hope people reading the article and Utrecht's guesswork realize this. At a recent conference somebody approached me personally and revealed some private information that might explain why Dr Clarke is so convinced the Calvine photograph depicts a secret American aircraft. I'm afraid I agreed to keep the details and their source strictly confidential, but I do hope this information can be published soon. For reasons I explain in the background links above, I don't think the Calvine object is the Aurora. The Aurora is a very sophisticated next generation reconnaissance platform, but it is still an aeroplane. It cannot hover or ascend vertically. Despite my misgivings, this is still an achievement of sorts by Dr Clarke. He has opened a channel of dialogue to the highest echelons of the UK military establishment. He is honest enough not to deny real evidence when it is handed to him so I feel more confident leaving this matter in his hands than I otherwise would have previously.
See here for additional background: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
And: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/06/dover-clowns-day-off.html.

Moment of Contact- a Review

 

James Fox is an established name on the UFOwood scene and has made many classic documentaries on the subject of UFO's. I was impressed with his previous work, The Phenomenon. It included no new cases, but lots of updates on existing ones, including new archive footage from the Lonnie Zamora encounter and the first exclusive interview with Mr Greenwood, the science teacher at the Westall school on that fateful day, breaking his silence after nearly fifty-five years. Therefore I eagerly anticipated Fox' new arrival, Moment of Contact. This is about the Varginha incident of 1996 in which several aliens were seen literally wandering the streets of a Brazilian town. See here for background to the incident: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2016/01/programme-172-podcast-varginha-20.html. The film dropped like a meteor yesterday onto all the major streaming services. I was worried it might not be on the UK version of Amazon Prime, the easiest and cheapest way to watch it; but it was. Unfortunately there is no rental option so I've bought it. £9.99 is not bad value actually. Some people in other countries are complaining that it's not yet visible on their own internet. It may just be technical errors, so hopefully that will be remedied soon. See: https://geni.us/MomentOfContact.
 
The film is very different in style to The Phenomenon. It follows the director James Fox to Brazil to investigate the incident personally. The film was, of course, made during the Covid 19 lockdown; as a result the crew have to wear masks some of the time. This is disconcerting, but maybe unavoidable. Varginha today has made a tourist attraction out of its UFOlogical superstardom and why not, as I said here?: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2013/04/roswell-upon-avon.html. There is an alien museum and even a water tower in the city called Disco Voador, literally "flying saucer" and it looks like one. There is nothing in this documentary that is in itself revolutionary, yet it contributes a lot to what I call the "pile of Disclosure", the accumulation of evidence that when it reaches a critical mass inevitably ends the Truth Embargo. It also includes an interview with that late great hero Stanton T Friedman, one of the last he ever gave before we lost him, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2019/06/programme-325-podcast-stanton-friedman.html. Because this is rural Brazil, the dialogue is almost entirely in Portuguese, but there are good subtitles that are easy to follow. This is a much stronger case than most crash-retrievals because research into it began straight away; compared with Roswell in which it took thirty-one years. Fox and his team begin with the simplest method imaginable, standing on street corners with placards asking for comments from the Varghinian public. It turned out to be an effective method because they get an interview with the mayor who it turns out is also a "Buh-Leeva!" As with The Phenomenon, some of the questions in this existing case that have remained mysteries were settled. Where did the "minibus-submarine" UFO crash? A witness takes them to the exact location. Carlos de Sousa, who was interviewed back in 1996, is very emotional as he leads the crew to the spot. It's obviously the first time he has been back there in all those years. Another new witness talks about how there was a military cordon in the town around where the alien was seen by the three girls and captured by the two cops. The witness says the army do not normally operate inside the city which contradicts what Lieutenant Colonel Lúcio Carlos Finholdt Pereira stated as an explanation, that the trucks seen in the street were doing normal military operations. Fox and the team visit the exact spot where Liliane, Valquiria and Katia saw the brown being. At the time it was a grassy passage between houses that gave access to the wooded valley between Jardim Andere and the eastern side of Varginha. There has been a lot of building in the area since and that access is blocked; but today, for some reason, the slot where the alien was seen has never been built on. It's a patch of waste ground seventy feet across. Equally perplexing is it is behind a locked gate and the crew had to break the lock to get in. The three girls stand by their story, after all these years, as does their mother who went to the location shortly afterwards and found a footprint of the alien. There's also an interview with the sister of Marco Chereze, who ironically looks very much like another UFOlogical heroine, Brenda Butler. She has been campaigning to find truth and justice for her brother, the policeman who handled the being, since the day he died, not long afterwards. As with Fox last production, there is exclusive old footage seen for the first time. In this case it is videos of Dr John Mack and Dr Roger Leir exploring the area and talking to the witnesses. There are also other new witnesses, including a family who live nearby who wished to remain nameless. They saw a UFO shortly after the alien was captured. They got the impression it was looking for the lost beings, as if it were a rescue party. There was also an interview with a radiographer at the hospital where the aliens were taken who did an X-ray of one of them, being told of course that he was not allowed to tell anybody. I wonder if this is the "surgeon" Timothy Good spoke to. He might have lied about his position to hide his identity. The most interesting new witness was a man codenamed "Military X" who reports that he drove one of the vehicles to the Humanitas Hospital to pick up the ET. It had been seen by several people in a box being loaded aboard a lorry. He provides a photograph from the actual mission which must have been taken surreptitiously. It shows the vehicles driving along the streets of Varginha. He reports he glimpsed the being in the box at the hospital before being ushered out of the room. Apparently all the other personnel involved in that operation have vanished. They were transferred out of the garrison and have not been in contact with the soldiers left behind. Things turn rather hairy at one point because Fox' team manages to track down Chereze's supervisor on that day. He was in the car with Chereze when they went to capture the alien. His name is Eric Lopes, but he was not very amenable to being questioned. When Fox' crew approach him in his home he orders them to leave and threatens to shoot them if they don't. Why would somebody make such a fuss about a pregnant dwarf couple and a local disabled man? Moment of Contact achieves a lot. It must surely reopen this case and make it current again. I'm not sure it has the most relevant title, but that doesn't really matter. What matters is that whoever is keeping the secret of the Varginha incident, "Brazil's Roswell", they are going to hate this film. The skeptics will too because all their favourite dismissals were discredited in it. As I said, there is no single deal-breaker moment in this documentary, but it all contributes to the pile and who knows where its revelations might lead?
See here for additional background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2022/08/brazil-alien-video.html.
And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2022/10/moment-of-contact-watch-party.html.