A few weeks ago it was the eighteenth anniversary of the 9/11
attacks. This terrible atrocity has come of age. There are now adults walking
the earth who have lived their entire life in the post-9/11 world. To mark the
occasion a TV documentary was screened. This was not a premiere; the programme
was originally shown in 2015. After eighteen years of telling people that they
were simply deluded for thinking fuel and office fires combined with impact
damage from the two airliners caused the two giant skyscrapers to collapse; the
"experts" are now saying their critics were right all along. The
official story does not make sense...
What!?... The alternative view of what happened in the forty-five minute
programme is provided exclusively by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, a
group of people who have spread false information about "what else
happened?". This centres on supposed forensic evidence that conventional explosives
and thermite charges were used to destroy the buildings. The programme then focuses
on the work of Dr Frank Greening and Dr Christian Simensen, two scientists who
have supposedly cleared up the remaining questions raised over the destruction
of the World Trade Centre (Only towers One and Two of course. We don't talk
about Building 7) and successfully debunks the "EEEEEvil conspiracy
theorists!" What they claim is that a vital piece of evidence has been
ignored through an astonishing oversight. With grand fanfare the truth is
revealed. The presence of the aircraft wreckage itself was the principle cause
of the burning that caused the structure to weaken; not the fuel, but the
airframe. Airliners are constructed primarily of aluminium, a light strong
metal. However when it is molten and heated above a certain temperature, and
then mixed with water, a chemical reaction takes place in which the metal and
water become aluminium oxide and hydrogen. This mixture generates intense fire
and explosions. It is these explosions that the fire-fighters supposedly heard.
It also is the alleged source of the glowing molten metal seen pouring from the
building. Source: https://www.my5.tv/conspiracy-the-missing-evidence/season-1/twin-towers-the-missing-evidence.
This entire documentary is a distraction and is designed to
confuse the viewer, especially those who are allowing their curiosity to lead
them into alternative explanations for 9/11. I don't know personally whether
this inadvertent watery and aluminium forge could have occurred in the
shattered and smouldering segment of the two towers; but really it doesn't
matter. It's a moot question and it is meant to be. The work of Dr Judy Wood
proves that the atrocity in New York City September the 11th 2001
was of a fundamentally different nature, see: http://www.drjudywood.com/wp/.
Everything in the Channel 5 documentary above, including the counterproposition
presented by Dr Richard Gage, is irrelevant and it is intended to misdirect and
obfuscate; therefore maintaining the official story.
See here for more
information: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/11/incontrovertible-premier.html.
No comments:
Post a Comment