The British Labour Party has split. Oddly enough this is not
primarily due to Brexit, at least not overtly. Seven Labour members of the House
of Commons have resigned from the party, three men and four women; or as they
say in the Labour Party, "Women!" They are: Luciana Berger, Ann
Coffey, Mike Gapes, Chris Leslie, Gavin Shuker, Angela Smith and Chuka Umunna.
Only two of those names are of any distinction. Chuka Umunna was once tipped to
be party leader before the election of Jeremy Corbyn; which might explain why
he now has an axe to grind with Corbyn. Luciana Berger has always opposed
Corbyn's leadership and vigorously supported both attempts to unseat him. She is
herself a Jewess and has been subjected to online anti-Semitic abuse. She
claims that Labour is now "institutionally anti-Semitic". A member of
Corbyn's campaign management team denounced Ms Berger because she supposedly was backing
the Israeli state "whose Nazi masters taught them well!" Ironically Ms
Berger has also been accused by Zionists within the Jewish community of not doing
enough to support Israel .
Obviously these attacks from both sides are going to unnerve her, to say the
least; but that does not excuse her pronouncements that brought her to the
attention of HPANWO. Last year she launched an attack against Corbyn for his
comments regarding a mural by the artist "Mear One" that she claimed
was anti-Semitic. I thought that this was ridiculous and was as bad as the
silly accusations that David Icke is anti-Semitic; therefore I said so in no
uncertain terms, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/03/anti-semitic-mural.html.
How can anybody accuse Jeremy Corbyn of being anti-Semitic when he has been
active in left-wing causes his whole life? He is dedicated to the Palestine Solidarity
Campaign; but, as I've said many times before, opposition to Israel
does not equal hated of Jews. Also how fair is it to say that Labour is
institutionally anti-Semitic? See the background links below for more details. If
there is any anti-Semitism in Labour then it probably comes only from the
radical Islamists. The seven MP's are calling themselves "the independent
group", but this is just a temporary title. They have ruled out joining
the Liberal Democrats and their objective is to form a brand new party. For the
time being though they will probably have to tender their resignations and call
by-elections in their constituencies. Their electorate might not like the idea
of being governed by an independent Member of Parliament without any manifesto.
No doubt Labour will put up official candidates in all their seats to challenge
them. It was only a short time ago they were voted for as part of a
Corbyn-ruled party and all of them increased their majorities. Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-47277281.
This is not the first time this has happened. In 1981 four
Labour MP's, Roy Jenkins, David Owen, Bill Rodgers and Shirley Williams, quit
the party and formed a new one, the Social Democratic Party. Known as the
"gang of four", they quickly formed a left-of-centre alliance with
the Liberal Party and stood in the election under a coalition banner. This
arrangement soon became permanent when they merged together to become the
Liberal Democrats which exists to this day. However the Lib-Dems almost totally
crashed out of government in 2015 following their crooked coalition with the
Tories. Those five years as a junior partner to power destroyed them. As is
often the case, there was more than one motive for that split. The gang of four
opposed the infiltration of Labour by the Marxist-Trotskyist group Militant which
was famous for their handheld newspaper sellers who made a point of attending
every Labour event (Ironically, one of their principle figures, Derek Hatton,
has just been allowed back into Labour by Corbyn after his expulsion in 1986 by
the man who is now the UK's EU commissioner, Lord Kinnock. How strange these
twists of fate can be). However, the four were also "euroskeptics", a
nostalgic term that meant a Brexiteer before Britain
was completely in the European Union and so the aim was the easier one of keeping
us out instead of getting us out, which is the task we have now. We are faced
with an opposite situation with this new split because the "independent
group" are all Remainers and are dedicated to a second EU referendum. I'm
not sure what effect this eventuality will have, if any. As I've said before, Parliament
and the mainstream political arena is now a virtual establishment monopoly when
it comes to Brexit. There is literally nobody within its walls who is committed
to the process at all. UKIP have revealed themselves to be grossly incompetent
as best and totally controlled opposition at worst, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/12/whats-wrong-with-ukip.html.
At some point very soon Theresa May's nine lives will finally run out and there
will be a general election. In my view, its outcome will matter little when it
comes to increasing the possibility of Brexit. The only hope now lies with grassroots
pressure from the great British public and independence movements in other EU
member states. I am also still hopeful that political transformation in the United
States of America and elsewhere will be a
positive influence, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2019/01/denying-2016.html.
See here for
background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2015/09/the-corbinator-wins.html.
Ben I object to the term "Jewess". Sounds like something a neo nazi would say. Please can you retract it? Im a Jewish woman and i find it offensive. I dont think you're antisemitic which is why im sure youd hate to offend anyone. Best regards and peace. Rachel
ReplyDeleteHi Rachel. "Jewess" is not a neo-Nazi term; it is a legitimate word that you can find in the dictionary that simply means a Jewish woman. the "-ess" suffix indicates a feminine version, such as "hostess" etc. Therefore I will not be retracting it. It is not my intention to offend anybody, but if I do inadvertently, so be it. I suggest you ask yourself WHY you feel this way about something that is so literally innocuous.
ReplyDeleteWhilst i accept you may not have intended it to be offensive it quite simply is offensive to Im sure lots of Jewish women and certainly to me it is. Gender nouns often diminish women (think "poetess" etc) but "Jewess" was used by the Nazis. Like the word "paki" it might not be intrinsically racist but it has strong racist associations. I should hate for us to fall out Ben. :-)
ReplyDeleteRachel. The word "paki" most certainly IS racist and I would never address anybody with it. It is not the same as Jewess. An online dictionary defines it as "a female Jew" It is old-fashioned and it is only regarded as offensive in recent years because it is one of an entire category of words that are gender-specific and therefore politically incorrect. If you're familiar with HPANWO then you will know that I am deeply opposed to political correctness. I consider it highly sinister and Orwellian. You will also have seen my film "Jews" and its accompanying radio show and article. You will therefore know that I regularly defend Jews from any wrongdoing in the conspiracy sense. I don't want to fall out with you either, but if the only way to prevent that is to edit myself in line with the latest edition of the Newspeak Dictionary then it's no deal. Good day.
ReplyDeleteOk Ben fair points. Funny though how no one says "catholicess" or "muslimess" etc etc but "Jewess" is considered ok. Im not
ReplyDeletesaying you're antisemitic Ben. No evidence of it. Antisemitism though is returning to plague Europe again with a renewed vigour. As well as the Labour Party, the conspiracy world is extremely antisemitic and people like David Icke should show some leadership here but he is one of the worst. Denial of the holocaust is now fashionable in certain quarters and i bet in secret David Icke denies it. I hope you'll join me Ben in attacking antisemitism wherever it rears its ugly head? Best regards R
Hi Rachel. Check out my latest video: "Is David Icke Evil?" David is not an anti-Semite and this "I bet in secret he denies it" is very Orwellian. It is unprovable. I don't think David has ever denied the Holocaust in secret because if he had somebody would have secretly recorded him by now. Of course I attack anti-Semitism; that was the whole point of my publications on Jews. All the best. Ben
ReplyDeleteBen I am very pleased that you abhor antisemitism. Most refreshing in the conspiracy sphere. I was of course speculating on Icke which is based on what is known, and we all speculate based on experience and reasoning. I think you're going a tad over the top by inferring it is a sinister and "Orwellian" thing to do. If Icke denies the holocaust it would hardly be incongruent to his many absurd theories and he does appear to use antisemitic tropes. Best regards. Rachel
ReplyDeleteHi Rachel. I'm not sure I'm going over the top at all. For instance the left contantly uses terms like "microaggression", "tacit", "dog whistling", and "check" usually followed by "your privilege". This kind of nonsense is extremely unhealthy. It presents an unfalsifiable accusation in which the suspect, most often a white heterosexual male, cannot be proved innocent. I was once told on Facebook that I was a racist and when I protested my accuser said: "Maybe you ARE racist, but you just don't know it." How on earth can somebody be racist and not know it? As for "anti-Semitic tropes" what do you mean? A trope is a metaphorical use of a word or expression. A hatred or fear of Jews must be a distinctly literal feeling! Best wishes. Ben
ReplyDeleteHi again Ben. Yes David Icke has popularised antisemitic tropes more than most in the 21st century I would argue, certainly in the UK. His constant use of "Rothschild zionism" is a compelling example. I wonder what Icke thinks about the Protocols of Zion? Does he accept they are a forgery intended to stir up pogroms? Or does he have other ideas? I can't really be bothered to research Icke because I find him to be an idiot though he's quite pernicious. A lot follow him and where you get simplistic though outlandish conspiracy theories, antisemitism is never far behind. Cheers. R
ReplyDeleteOh forgot to add. Good article on all this. Fairly recent in the Guardian
ReplyDeletehttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/nov/27/david-icke-unite-labours-factions-conspiracists
Rachel, David actually explains clearly the difference between Rothschild Zionism and Judaism, therefore it is not an anti-Semitic trope, at least not by David's definition. It's possible other people do use the term as a substitute for Judaism, but David is not one of them. David has an entire chapter in And The Truth about the Protocols of Zionism and he takes a similar position to Bill Cooper and myself, that the document is a hoax, but it was transcribed from literary sources that had access to an original genuine document that had no Jewish flavour. Please see my HPANWO TV video "Jews" for more details. Funnily enough I've just made a video where that article in The Guardian comes up. See HPANWO TV and my film "David Icke Banned from Australia".
ReplyDeleteAntisemitism (so called!) is modern day sacrilege akin to devil worship of yore. Remember what Voltaire said about not being able to insult those who rule you? The jews have inordinate power in the western world, that is a fact. Banking, usury and global capitalism are all Jewish led. The media also very Jewish dominated. Then we have the coudenhove kalergi plan which is very real Ben. Be afraid, be very afraid!
ReplyDeleteNick. I disagree. There are perfectly innocent reasons why Jews gravitate to certain professions. Please watch my film "Jews" and its accompanying radio show and articles.
ReplyDeleteYes Ben but as a conspiracy theorist you cannot disregard compelling patterns of the west's highest echelons being Jewish dominated. This is no time for political correctness, we have to put our heads above the parapet every so often. You know what I say is true. Nick
ReplyDeleteNick, I know what you say is NOT true. I am not motivated by political correctness at all; on the contrary, I always rave against it. In my video, article and radio show on the subject I explain in a logical and categorical way why Jews are not to blame for the NWO.
ReplyDeleteI have watched it Ben but I disagree with your analysis. I find with the greatest respect, that your thesis is superficial. The jews invented the materialist doctrines of both communism and capitalism. That is very well documented. Both these socioeconomic creeds are respectively internationalist and globalist. They are behind all the socially leftist yet economically right wing/liberal movements to flood Europe with the third world. They hold all the main levers of power in the USA and Europe. They are behind western military-industrial intervention in the Middle east.
ReplyDeleteNow zionists are behind a plot to remove Corbyn because he's both pro Palestinian and he's a threat to Jewish capital. That Labour is an antisemitic party is the big lie that is being swallowed hook line and sinker by the brainwashed electorate. Cheers. Nick
Hi Nick. You're certainly correct about Corbyn and the Labour Party, although the capital you refer to is not Jewish. I still disagree with you about the first part. In the film I explain that the origins of communism date back to British utopians and capitalism emerged naturally out of the scientific advancement of the Enlightenment.
ReplyDeleteBen, the origins of capitalism are far more complex than being merely about scientific advancement. Technological industrialisation is only a small part of the story. Capitalism as controlled by a relatively small number of Jewish global banking concerns is about oligarchical Jewish power which is becoming increasingly consolidated. I can't believe you can glibly dismiss a global Jewish conspiracy. Talk about "the elephant in the room" ffs! The more they moan about people hating them, the more people will hate them! Their persecution complex and how this is forced down people's throats through the mass media is ONLY due to their wholly disproportionate power in western society. Nick
ReplyDelete... Also Ben tell me all about the world banks that arnt dominated by jews?
ReplyDeleteNick, have you really watched the film? I do cover some of your questions in it. I do not pretend that there is not a prevalence of Jews in finance, as there is in the performing arts. However the idea that this is because Jews are "running the banks and Hollywood" based on this fact is an assumption of cause. There are natural and innocent reasons why Jewish people gravitate to those professions. I do not "glibly" dismiss the global Jewish conspiracy; I explain rationally why it is false. The origins of capitalism DO lie primarily with scientific advancement. It is more complex than just that, you're right; but the explanation that Jews created that revolution is society is totally untrue. Jewish people do often feel hard-done-by and a lot of that comes from the general drive in education and the media to make certain demographics feel that way as part of cultural Marxism. However, it is not Jews per se who are generating their drive for a medal in the Victimhood Olympics.
ReplyDeleteBen. I think every single scholar in the Frankfurt School aka the original "cultural marxists" were Jewish. Every single one! Ergo cultural marxism IS a Jewish ideology. Thanks
ReplyDeleteNick, that is like saying Monsanto and GMO's must be blamed on the French because they are all such great gourmets. Are you sure you watched my "Jews" documentary?
ReplyDeleteYes i watched it and read your blog on jews from some time ago. I don't think your comparison re Monsanto is a very strong one. The jewish creed of international marxism, social liberalism and neoliberal capitalism is a well established discourse. Im not sure if you've looked into all this at a sufficiently deep leve. Cheers
ReplyDeleteI think I have, Nick. I've researched this subject in great detail. I've watched a lot of talks by Dr David Duke, Kevin MacDonald and many others. I explain in my film what I think is the real reason why Jewish people are drawn to leftist ideas without them necessarily being the cause of those ideas. Honestly, do you think Bernie Sanders really wants to take over the world?
ReplyDeleteNo Sanders doesn't need to take over the world as the west is already based on well entrenched Jewish-American cultural imperialism. When you say that jews are not the cause of leftist ideas then who is? I mean Marx and Trotsky the two most influential leftists in world history were Jews and moreover the infinitely more pervasive Frankfurt School (the original 'cultural marxists') ALL without exception Jews! You never addressed jewish ideology which is materialist and internationaist based. Communism and capitalism are both global materialistic creeds. We have a world economic system based on neoliberal Jewish usury finance, which is by the way, totally Jewish dominated yet we also have concomitant left/liberal social policy. Ben I've spent many years studying this and with all due respect I don't base my findings on a few tacky internet sites or David Icke books. Id seriously love to hear your opinion on where jews get their leftist ideas from if not other leading jews. Nick
ReplyDeleteActually, Nick, I have addressed Jewish ideology. I explained in the film why Jewish people are naturally inclined towards left-wing principles. It was not only Marx and Trotsky, but Lenin who were Jews. But this does not mean that Marxism is a product of Judaism. Capitalism is not a product of Judaism either, although I did not detail that in the film. Time for a sequel perhaps. Usury is found all over the global financial system, as you said; but it is not a product of Judaism either. Its ideas can be found in the Black Nobility of Venice and other places in the 13th century and afterwards. Marxism was invented by a Jew of course, but its origins can be found among earlier thinkers among the English utopians; people like John Ruskin, who was a gentile. I don't know where you get the idea that I base my ideas on "tacky internet sites or David Icke books". That sounds like an ad-hominem to me. I have endevoured to gain as much information as possible on this subject. I've worked in collaboration with Dr Nick Kollerstrom and I've studied the works of Dr David Duke and Kevin MacDonald.
ReplyDeleteLenin in fact was quarter Jewish as his mother half Jewish though it is believed that Lenin may have been unaware of this. Also you say usury is universal when in fact it is illegal in Islamic countries.
ReplyDeleteUsury began in the middle ages with the Jews. The count or nobleman of a town would loan money to a Jewish person, and that person would lend to non-Jewish peasants. Interest rates were approximately 30-40%, making it difficult for peasants to pay their debts. That is the origin of usury Ben. Also you suggest that Marxism a uniquely Internationalist/universalist ideology was influenced by English utopians etc. Not true. Yes Marx was influenced by the Paris commune but he adapted Hegelian dialects to build a theory of social evolution based on class conflict.
Marx and Marx alone has been responsible for world revolutionary movements and 'cultural' as in non economic strands of equality. We have now the triumph of western Jewish ideology with globalist usury capitalism and marxian social policy. Capitalism as in the Jewish global western type is about building a homogenised world of slaves and consumers. Overthrowing national pride and building a one world government where trans-national banking and business override elected government. Lastly I can assure you that I didn't mean to offend you. I do think though that you need to research all this using a wider variety of sources. Thanks. Nick
No problem, Nick. I don't think we're going to reach consensus on this. I'd like to move on to another topic now. Have a look at my other articles. Ben
ReplyDeleteBen, jews do run the planet though. Israel controls America and evidence to suggest it manipulates the British political system with its powerful proxy Friends of Israel in both major parties.
ReplyDeleteSimon, as you can see by scrolling up, I have just spent a long time debating that subject with Nick. I disagree with him still as I disagree with you. If you have any additional points to those I make in the above comments, plus those in my film "Jews", the accompanying radio show and accompanying article then please tell me. Otherwise we'll have to leave it there because I'm not going to rehash points I've already discussed. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteOk that's fine Ben. I respect your opinions. You don't though in your film do you address the Friends of Israel lobby which is extremely powerful in both Tory and Labour. Zionist machinations will ensure that Corbyn will never be PM and that British government and politics always support Israel above all else. Cheers. S
ReplyDelete