Monday, 6 August 2018

Right-Wing Conspiracy

Neil Sanders is an expert on mind control who has lectured widely and has written a series of interesting books on the subject. He has also been a guest on HPANWO Radio, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2016/08/programme-199-podcast-neil-sanders.html. He has more recently spoken on radio interviews and written in his blog about Brexit and Trump and who he believes is behind them and why, for example: https://richardwillett.podbean.com/e/tin-foil-hats-neil-sanders-the-suits-behind-cambridge-analytica/ and: https://neilsandersmindcontrol.com/index.php/jaggyblog/cambridge-analytica-and-the-creation-of-right-wing-media and: https://www.richplanet.net/richp_guest.php?ref=245&part=1&person=2. Donald Trump was a New York businessman who came out of the blue to be elected President of the United States. With every corner of the mainstream media opposing him and despite running against one of the most powerful women in the world, he triumphed. For some people in the Truth Movement, including me, it looked as though things had gone badly wrong for the New World Order at a very fundamental level. I even wondered if we might be looking at the defeat of the New World Order agenda in our lifetimes! This is the great hope; I came out with phrases like "Brexit-Trump", "springtime in Narnia", and "the 2016 effect", see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2016/11/conspiracy-theorists-finally-proved.html. Naturally, at the back of my mind, there has always been a whisper of caution. Could this simply be another trick? What if Trump and Brexit are just a craftier and more subtle twist in the machinations of the globalist elite? Neil says yes. That is exactly what is going on. He dismisses the notion that Trump is a wildcard and not a government insider; on the contrary, he says Trump is in fact a placeman for a powerful network of super-rich plutocrats centred around somebody called Robert Mercer, a computer scientist and financier from New Mexico USA. Mercer is the single biggest individual donor in the entire 2016 US Presidential Election. He used his skill in the world of computing to influence the internet using a data analysis and strategic communications firm called Cambridge Analytica. Neil says this is a psychological warfare outfit and its methodology is similar to the CIA, MI5, GCHQ and other organizations which have been proven to have meddled in foreign democratic processes, especially in South America. Mercer was helped by a now notorious individual called Steve Bannon, the company's vice-president; and they used a number of underhand schemes to influence public opinion in favour of Trump's campaign. The media organization Breibart was essential to this and Steve Bannon soon became editor-in-chief of it. It was subsidized by Mercer. Robert Mercer also used Cambridge Analytica to engineer the Leave vote during the Brexit referendum and worked closely with Nigel Farage. Fear of Islam and Muslims was a tactic they used and they have been helped by Rebel Media, which is another part of Mercer's network and includes Tommy Robinson, former leader of the English Defence League. (I have been concerned about this myself for a long time and have written before about how the "counter-Jihad" has a place in the future civil war being planned and also furthering the interests of Israel, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2013/10/tommy-robinson-quits-edl.html). The scale of this network is huge and it contains numerous names familiar to and respected by those in both the Alt-Right and the Conspirasphere, such as Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, Richard Spencer, Lauren Southern, James O'Keefe, Dr Jordan Peterson, Dave Rubin. Laura Loomer and many many more. Even the slogans "drain the swamp!", "make America great again!" "build the wall!", "fake news" and "deep state" come from Mercer and Bannon's public relations consultants.

This is disturbing news. If Neil is right then it means the possibilities an entire sector of the Truth Movement were hoping for are wrong; we have been chasing a mirage. Is this the case though? Neil describes himself as apolitical. He is neutral over the subject of Brexit and does not vote in UK elections. He describes the situation with this analogy: "Voting in the US Election/UK Election/EU referendum was like being a child choosing a boarding school. It doesn't matter what you want, it doesn't matter which option that you decide on; the only certainty is you are going to get screwed by an older person who is richer than you." He says he is equally opposed to left-wing authorities too and he only opposes the right because we have a right-wing government. He said: "I can't wait for Corbyn to get him so I can have a go at him as well!" The only reason he is exposing this right-wing conspiracy is because it is the only one he has found so far. Despite his professed neutrality, Neil uses a lot of left-wing buzz-words in his speech such as "Nazi", "far right", "white supremacist", "white privilege" etc. He sees politics as primarily a clash between the interests of rich and poor people which is a distinctly Marxian worldview. It is true that the Illuminati have used the right in politics to advance the New World Order, but they have also used the left. Neil explores the way Muslims and Islam are portrayed as the biggest threat to civilization and says: "Before Muslims it was people on benefits, and before them it was black people, and before them it was the Irish." However there is a left-wing equivalent of this which is that white heterosexual men are responsible for everything bad in the world, past and present, and destroying them is the solution to all the world's problems; yet Neil fails to address this. In fact in one of his interviews he says: "If you're worried about white genocide, just go and have children with another white person; problem solved!" But he ignores the noble work of one of the people he lists as part of the Mercer-Bannon network, Lauren Southern. She has made a documentary film called Farmlands about the very real genocide of South Africa's white population, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_bDc7FfItk. The global community is looking the other way and pretending this atrocity is not happening. If this right-wing network truly is all-powerful, can't it do something about that? Here is another example of left-wing global interventionism, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/05/irish-pro-abortion-victory.html. Neil also uses the phrase "Muslim ban" to refer to Executive Order 13769, the Trump administration's policy for reducing access to the United States by possible terrorists. If it is a ban on Muslims then why is Pakistan not on the list of prohibited nations, why not India, Bangladesh, Malaysia? Over three-quarters of the world's Muslims live in those four countries. Neil has unfortunately just repeated fake news. Neil also mentions "men's rights activists" in a pejorative context. This is no doubt because Dr Jordan B Peterson is on the Mercer-Bannon hit-list. However Dr Jordan Peterson has been somebody I have studied closely and I have found his insights inspiring and uplifting. I discuss him in detail on this HPANWO Show, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2018/03/programme-274-podcast-beata-van-berkom.html. I must ask Neil, was Dr Peterson therefore inserted into the public space to do some kind of damage? Was his persecution by his employers, faculty and students at Toronto University some sort of act to bring him to the attention of "Nazis!"? When he had eggs thrown at him, had labels like "racist!", "misogynist!" etc hurled at him by hecklers in his lectures, was this all set up by Steve Bannon? "Think you can handle it, Jordy? Don't worry, mate; we'll pay you compensation." What Dr Jordan Peterson has done is teach people that they don't have to hate. Women don't have to hate men to be free. Black people don't have to hate white people to be free. White men don't have to hate themselves to be free. This revelation has given millions of people across the world a new lease of life. I cannot accept that the richness, depth and complexity of Dr Peterson's work are just the machinations of a billionaire conservative plot to enslave the world. The same goes for many other "problematic pseudo-intellectuals!" I've been following. Honestly, how far has Dr Peterson's work advanced the white male redneck ruling class hegemony? From what I can see, not one inch; in fact it has done the opposite. This is why I question Neil's middle-of-the-road persona. Could Neil Sanders be a closet pinko? If he is, I won't hold it against him. There is good on the left. I myself support some leftist principles, such as a fully-funded National Health Service, see here for details: https://hpanwo-hpwa.blogspot.com/2018/06/nhs-seventieth-anniversary.html. Neil can come out to me if he likes and I'll be understanding. Also why does Neil not mention several other people, such as Stefan Molyneux, Carl Benjamin ("Sargon of Akkad" on YouTube), Rin Michaelis, Dave Cullen and a few others? These are very influential centrist, anti-feminist, anti-cultural Marxist and conservative spokespeople; why are they not being funded by Richard Mercer? Neil also dismisses the QAnon phenomenon as a hoax perpetrated by trolls on 4-Chan. Again, this doesn't fit with what I've discovered, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2018/07/programme-292-podcast-duncan-campbell.html and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/07/q-anon-livestream.html. Neil also doesn't explain all the details of Richard Mercer's donation. Yes, Mercer donated to the 2016 US Presidential Election, yes he donated over thirteen million dollars-US and that was a record-breaking amount... but most of it went not to Donald Trump, but to Ted Cruz, Trump's rival in the primaries. Mercer originally backed Cruz and then switched to Trump. Obviously I am biased over this issue; I want Neil Sanders to be wrong... because if he is not wrong then probably, to put it politely, we're fucked, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2018/05/dreaming-saucers-ben-emlyn-jones.html. However, this does not automatically mean that any of my criticism or questioning of Neil's research is to be therefore instantly disregarded because of my feelings on the matter. I have endeavoured to remain objective here. I am able and prepared to face the truth however much it hurts; but I think Neil has missed something. I don't dispute that he is factually correct about the activities of Richard Mercer and his associates, but perhaps there is another explanation for it than the one he has proposed. To answer that will take further research. For the time being, in my view, what Neil has published so far is not conclusive.

10 comments:

  1. Awesome research dude. I've become very alt-right of late Ben. The "times they are a changing" mate. We on the radical right are no longer seen as boorish lumpen skinheads but in fact suave middle class intellectuals. The movement spearheaded by Steve Bannon is set to take Europe and the UK by storm. I'm a big fan of Bannon. What's your take on him? I hope you'll join us Ben. Cheers. Paul

    ReplyDelete
  2. It would be interesting to get Neil on agiain and listen to you two talk this though.

    A lot of the grey areas seem to stem from both of your tendencies to label, or pidgeon hole everyone/everything with left/right terms, I think you've both conciously tried to avoid it, or at least caveat it, but the language it's self (or common use of it) lets you both down a bit. I appreciate how difficult it can be to maintain apolitical language, I'd argue I'm apolitical, but I'm sure a lot of people would class me as a lefty, more for the reason my 'working class' vocabulary is limited compared to your average 'intellectual'.

    I think this control of language is purposeful, not by either of you, more in the way definitions in general discourse have been bastardised into a left-right paradigm, to encourage divide and conquer. That said, I think it's a great post Ben, and I'll look forward to more on this subject. PP.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Disagree with the last comment. People who are political tend to be either left or right, more or less. Taking sides is important, life is all about taking sides as Gramsci said. Nothing to do with 'divide and conquer' as that suggests lack of agency and free will. Totally absurd and insulting to suggest that everyone is controlled by some invisible force. That way of thinking makes certain people feel superior that they are different and part of some arcane elite!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks, Paul. Glad you enjoy the article. I'm not sure about Bannon. I was surprised to find out he'd been involved in space research in the past. He ran something called "Biosphere 2" which was part of a design for long-duration space missions. I think the Alt-Right is not "EEEEEvil!" but it is incorrect about an awful lot and will lead you in the wrong direction, as I say in the article. See the background links for more details.

    ReplyDelete
  5. PP, Neil would be welcome back. I see what you mean; I think it's straight out of Orwell who understood the human mind as the true battleground.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Adrian, I've only just started "The Prison Notebooks" so I've not covered all Gramsci in its original source. I think it is important to stand up for principles, if that's what you mean by "taking sides", however if the sides are decided for you as a political prefab package then you run the risk of being corralled into a false dichotomy.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Adrian After reading Pauls comment I wondered what sort of right/alt.right government he would prefer, and what life would be like under such a scenareo.

    so I surfed the web looking for historical comparrisons of left/right, and found very few people could agree on a right wing example, because definitions have changed. here's an example: https://www.quora.com/What-was-the-most-far-right-government-in-history

    Some Anarchists I've met are very political, where would you put an anarchist, left or right? what about crypto-anarchism? Again we stuggle with definitions, my idea of an anarchism is probably very different from the next guy who's opinions were formed by the MSM/MS politics. Corbett has some very interesting stuff on this, here's a link to his anarchism tagged peices: https://www.corbettreport.com/tag/anarchism/

    I would argue there is a controlling "invisible force". The world revolves around the money system, and those who control it, they are invisible since nobody can say who owns the central banking system, the BIS, or even our own central bank. This does not make me feel superior, or different, and certainly not part of an arcane elite! Quite the opposite, I consider those invisible people to the 'ptb/global elite' call them what you will. PP.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ben, I thought I had made it clear that sides are not decided for us. No evidence for this and sounds like the fantasy of conspiracy theorists who like to think people are sheep who are all controlled, except for them of course. No, conspiracy theorists are truly enlightened individuals!!!

    Our sides should be based on self interest with a secondary element of good will for the common good, as that is natural. If you're working class under the neoliberal cosh then it is rational to support socialism or social democracy. If you're rich then the same applies, you would support a party that supports the rich as in Conservative. Quite simple really Ben. We do though have a lot of turkeys who vote for Christmas. Perhaps they are controlled by powerful media interests? The working class Tory has always been a truly unedifying masochist obsequious spectacle! Cheers, Ade

    ReplyDelete
  9. Ade, I've explained why I don't agree. I can't reply without repeating a previous point.

    ReplyDelete