Wednesday, 8 April 2015

HPANWO Mailing List

The HPANWO mailing list is now open. To receive email notifications of new posts please sign up by adding your name and email address in the box at the bottom of the side column. Thanks to my friend Mr Jack for helping me sort this out. 
(Edit: This is not currently, working. But I'll get it sorted.)
(Edit x2: It's working now!)

Sunday, 5 April 2015

Ben Emlyn Jones on Energy, Politics and UFO's at High Wycombe 2015

My recent talk at the High Wycombe Paranormal Meet-up Group has been filmed, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzD4zxNoXyw.
It is of a lecture entitled Energy Politics and UFO's that I delivered there on the 28th of January, see here for more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/01/ben-emlyn-jones-at-high-wycombe.html. Many thanks to Neil Geddes Ward.

Saturday, 4 April 2015

English Defence League in Oxford

The English Defence League is a fairly new organization set up just six years ago in Luton in a response to an incident in which a military street parade was heckled by a small group of people dressed in traditional Muslim garb hurling abuse at the marching troops. Since then the group has expanded into a nationwide movement geared towards stopping the rise of Islam in the UK. The EDL says that it's non-racist and doesn't consider itself a part of the far right; its membership includes black people, Jews and Asians of Hindu and Sikh backgrounds. It's become renowned for its noisy and disruptive street protests, and today it brought its presence to Oxford in response to the local Muslim grooming scandal, see background links at the bottom for details. The EDL were opposed by a counter protest organized by Unite Against Fascism, an umbrella front of Muslim pressure groups and leftists; it is also affiliated to the authorities and politicians, and senior figures in the trade unions are involved. Some local councillors have made statements supporting the UAF in their demonstration against the EDL. The UAF regard the EDL as a far right racist and "islamophobic" organization no matter what the EDL themselves profess. I received an invitation on Facebook to attend the UAF event and clicked "maybe" before looking at it more carefully. The person inviting me was a friend from the hospital who himself is involved with UNISON, our trade union. When I looked closer I changed my status to "not going". If you recall, I myself have been labelled a "fascist!"; I was reported to the Birmingham UAF for the talk I gave at BUFOG. A person wrote to the UAF to say that I was a racist, far right anti-Semite, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-bufog.html. Luckily the UAF did not turn up and protest my event; this person has been leading a hate campaign against me for years and he tried to use the UAF as a lynch mob. These so called "anti-fascists" have targeted innocent people before, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/david-icke-loses-lawsuit.html. Are the EDL innocent?
I made my way into Oxford city centre.  What is often called "Oxford" by students and tourists alike, as if the rest of the place just doesn't exist. Immediately I could see something was going on.  There were a row of police vans on Magdalen Bridge and several officers wearing luminous jackets already patrolling the pavements.  According to my declined invite, Unite Against Fascism were assembling the for their anti-English Defence League protest at Bonn Square. More police were waiting there as I arrived and took a seat inconspicuously on a bench. Some were clad in sky-blue waistcoats designating them as police liaison officers, like the ones I met at Bilderberg fringe, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/bilderberg-2013.html. A light rain started to fall. I went into Marks and Spencer to use the toilet and when I came back a group of people had set up a stall with fliers and pamphlets on it. A man appeared from Unison with a handcart carrying a Unison banner and set it up; he was somebody whom I did not recognize or remember, and that was mutual.  A man in a mobility scooter had a loud speaker with him and began to play a song by Billy Bragg that is about the battle of Cable Street, this one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWBeGK96pVQ. Two policemen came over and told him to turn down the volume. A pair of blonde women turned up and began selling copies of Socialist Worker. They walked up and down the street with the ream of newspapers in their arms like Big Issue sellers.  People joined the event with their faces masked by hoods and scarves; it reminded me of the protests outside the Oxford union when Marine Le Pen spoke there, http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/marine-le-pen-at-oxford-union.html. Things began to look very tense, a column of riot police marched through the square; among them were medics, and then with a clopping of hooves a drove of police horses trotted past. Not long afterwards the first skirmish broke out, a cluster of young men in dark English Defence League dress came around the corner raising their fists in the air and grunting "Eeh! Eeh! EDL!... Eeh! Eeh! EDL!" The protesters in Bonn Square ran over and began hurling abuse at them. Fists flew and the police intervened to arrest several people. I left Bonn Square and headed for the railway station where I knew the EDL would be gathering soon. The English Defence League contingent were very different to the UAF. They were distinctly working class whereas the UAF looked like students and Bohemians. The EDL were about 80% men and all white whereas the UAF were much more mixed. The EDL were also far more cheery; they greeted each other warmly, laughed and shared jokes; there was almost a party atmosphere in the station forecourt. The UAF looked very grave and sombre, frightened and desperate almost. Another difference from the UAF was that most of the EDL wore regulation clothing with their motifs on, in particular a hooded jersey that so many of them wore that it was almost a uniform. A few of them had on novelty masks and one was dressed as a pig; this is presumably because the pig is considered an unholy animal by Muslims. One man wore a balaclava like a bank robber or terrorist. Two more coaches turned up and the contingent grew to about a hundred and fifty people. They had no fliers or other literature to distribute; they just draped their banners on the railings and sung a series of chants like: "We're the famous EDL!" "Let's go fuckin' mental! Let's go fuckin' mental! La la la la!" and: "Allah, Allah, who the fuck is Allah!?" The melodies were all from popular tunes. Then I noticed that they were passing round six-packs of beer and some of them started drinking heavily; they were doing this quite openly, but police didn't seem to mind. The march began and the chanting cheering EDL were guided away from the station, surrounded by a cordon of armoured police with the horses escorting them front and back. To avoid the roadworks in Frideswide Square the protesters were directed down the narrow residential area of Becket Street and Osney Lane; a few people came out of their front doors to watch as the EDL's strident chanting echoed off the overhanging stone walls. I tagged along behind along with several other onlookers who were not involved and just curious like me. As we turned the corner into Oxpens Road a commotion broke out. Some UAF members were standing at the side of the road waving placards and yelling epithets like: "Nazi scum! Off our streets! Fuckin' fascist bastards!" The EDL responded by hurling abuse back and chanting "You're not English! You're not English! You're not English any more!" which goes to the tune of Bread of Heaven. The police horses galloped round like sheepdogs to get between the two sides and the EDL were herded off to the left. On Park End Street another anti-fascist tried to break into the cordon and another punch-up erupted. I was quite close this time and had to press myself against a wall to avoid being knocked down by one of the police horses. One of the policemen was injured and had to be attended by a medic. As we walked up the hill at New Road somebody was standing on top of the old castle mound shouting something down at the marchers. This was a futile effort because he had no megaphone and so his words were inaudible from that distance; however the EDL assumed it was something antagonistic and shouted their "You're not English..." chant at him. For the EDL that must be the worst imaginable insult. The most dangerous part of the march was where we reached the crossroads by the county council offices for two reasons; firstly the council is considered guilty of culpable neglect by the EDL for supposedly allowing the Muslim groomers to commit their crimes unhindered. Also the crossroads is adjacent to Bonn Square where the UAF were holding their rally. A double line of police vans with a demilitarized zone in between kept the two sides apart, but their voices could be heard and a broadside of verbal artillery was exchanged. Through the gaps in the barricade I could see the UAF activists waving their placards in a menacing way. Halfway down Castle Street the pavement was closed so I got separated from the marchers. I strode down Old Greyfriars Street and headed them off at the magistrates court at Thames Street. The police stopped the march at the public toilets so the protesters could relieve themselves. There were so many of them that the men just urinated against the walls and let the women use the cubicles. I imagine they will have needed to go after all they had been drinking; a trail of beer cans clattered in their wake. The cordon at the top of the hill must have been broken because we looked back to see UAF protesters behind a new police blockade at the bottom of Albion Place. Eventually we reached the site of the rally at the bottom of St Aldates between the police station and crown court. I was surprised to see that the speakers included Albert Burgess who had been at the Critical Mass Radio conference, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-critical-mass.html. By now the UAF had managed to regroup a few hundred yards away by Christchurch and Albert's voice was mixed with their angry jeers.
The English Defence League didn't come across to me as badly as they've been portrayed by the media. They are noisy and boisterous; some of them were drunk, but they were reasonably well behaved when not being harangued by their opponents. One of the curious onlookers was an old lady who was holding a hand-written placard which said: "ONE RACE- HUMAN RACE" and a few of the protesters came over and debated politely with her. One young woman in particular, near the back of the march, regularly stopped to talk to passers-by; she was diplomatic and courteous. Also I saw no symptoms of the EDL being racists; quite the opposite in fact. The young woman who was talking to people outside the protest at one point walked over and affectionately embraced a black woman on the pavement. To call the EDL "Nazi scum!" is slanderous in my view. There was also an incident at the station when I was in the toilets. I was alone in there with an Asian man and a crowd of EDL blokes walked in; I was afraid they were going to give the Asian some trouble, but they were fine with him, even though they were clearly a bit tipsy and very excited. They even held the door open for him with a smile. What they are is very much against militant Islam. This is why they fly the flags of Israel and India as well as the Union Jack and St George's Cross. I've even seen the rainbow LGBT flag on films of their demos too. Their concerns about militant Islam are perfectly legitimate, but their concerns are without awareness. How many EDL supporters ever ask themselves a crucial question: Why has this happened? Why is it, in just two decades or so, we're suddenly beset by millions of Wabbahist radicals? I've spoken to EDL supporters online and the answer you'll usually get is something like: "Because there is so much immigration today from Muslim countries and the government are too lily-livered to do anything about it! And it helps Labour win votes!" But the truth is very different. A lot of Muslim immigrants are being radicalized in British mosques after they arrive in this country, and the government is not just passively allowing radical Wahhabism to grow here, they're deliberately making it happen, as I explain in the background links below. The street mob of angry Muslims in Luton in 2009 which triggered the formation of the EDL was itself almost certainly a government intelligence operation. The leader of it is known to be a UK secret service asset. The EDL themselves are being controlled by many people with strong links to Mossad. They are themselves a controlled opposition. I think they mean well and are sincere people; they're definitely not "fascists!" any more than I am; but they need to become aware of the real rules of the game they're involved in.

Wednesday, 1 April 2015

Disclosure Champagne

It’s now the first of April, but the following is no joke. The date is significant because the time period in which Stephen Bassett hoped that the Congressional Hearing Initiative would take effect has now expired, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/programme-125-podcast-stephen-bassett.html. Over the last few months I have been covering this process on HPANWO TV; in fact I’ll be producing a new episode of this series within the next few days. So far there are mixed feelings from the UFOlogy and Exopolitics community; some, like Bassett of course, remain optimistic, but others are deeply cynical. Despite the undertone of scepticism and Skepticism, as far as I can tell the atmosphere remains exciting and I’m still watching closely the CHI and also the upcoming Roswell Slides event, see background links. I’ve decided to spur along the process on an energetic level by buying a magnum of champagne to celebrate the upcoming day of Disclosure… maybe. The bottle you see in the photos above is not real champagne of course. I’m an ex-hospital porter and therefore cannot afford the real thing. It is a sparkling perry called Charlemagne; I bought it for £6.99 from a corner shop and it’s the same brand I complain about here: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/12/toast-new-year-with-fake-champagne.html. However I have no gripes along those lines today; it’s no longer the point. It’s still a bit of a swindle if you ask me, but this time I knew exactly what it was when I purchased it. As you can see, I’ve sealed the bottle with a note which reads: “To be opened on the day of Disclosure”. I couldn’t resist adding a little drawing of a flying saucer and a grey alien… bear with me, I know I’m no Neil Hague. I’m going to keep it under my bed and I’ve wrapped it in a plastic bag to keep the dust off it. Ideally I’d like to store it in the fridge so that it’s nice and chilled, but I share my fridge with a few other people and I’ve found that anything left in there only stays there for a certain amount of time before being consumed by somebody else, regardless of who owns it. I feel more confident than ever about the Disclosure issue; if it’s going to happen at all, it will happen sometime this year. That is not to say that the internal conflict I feel over UFO Disclosure, which I’ve talked about many times before, is completely gone; it definitely has not, see the background links. If Disclosure is possible it will happen round about now. I think if… when it happens, in whatever form it takes, Disclosure will be something to celebrate, hence the need to toast it in. Nevertheless, it will also be an extremely difficult experience in many different ways, as Richard Dolan and Bryce Zabel detail in their book AD- After Disclosure, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7rv9Qb6Lho. I think it could be highly traumatic, for the reasons Dolan and Bryce discuss, but also others. Therefore my Disclosure bottle will help me face that glorious and terrible day with a bit of Dutch courage. I’ll film myself drinking it and put the footage on HPANWO TV, if the internet is working of course. Whatever the short term consequences of Disclosure, they will never be as bad as the long term consequences of it not happening. The obvious question is: what will I do with the champagne if we don’t get Disclosure within my lifetime? I thought that maybe my grandchildren can drink it, if I ever have any. But that’s impossible because if we don’t get Disclosure before then they won’t be alive… in fact nobody will.
And: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/12/ufo-disclosure-2015-happy-new-year-last.html

Sunday, 29 March 2015

Why’s it called HPANWO?

I’ve had an interesting letter from a regular HPANWO-reader whom I also know from talking to him on an internet forum. He appreciates my contribution very much and reassured me that he was not being derogatory, but he asks something that many other people have over the past few years: “Why have you set up a group called ‘Hospital Porters Against the New World Order’?” People make the point that it’s not really a group at all, it’s just a name for what I do on the internet. That’s true and I’ve never pretended otherwise. My correspondent, I’ll call him “Jerry”, has been discussing this with a friend of his and they had found themselves unable to grasp why I had chosen the acronym HPANWO, partly because it’s misleading; it suggests there are a large number of hospital porters involved. In fact there’s just me, however a few of my Brother and Sister Porters at the John Radcliffe are open-minded to the subjects I discuss and I’ve been contacted by porters in other hospitals who are on my wavelength. Another problem Jerry’s friend had was that I’m “doing myself an injustice”. He put himself in the position of somebody new to the Truth movement and thought they might see the HPANWO brand as a fantasy dreamed up by somebody with “delusions of grandeur”. He fears this could be used to discredit my work, after all the media has trained the general public to react to anything to put on the laughter cue card. I replied thus (notes in parentheses are not in my letter):

Hi Jerry.
Thanks for writing; it's good to put a real name to a username.
Several people have made this comment to me, in fact Tony Topping does in my recent HPANWO Radio interview, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/programme-130-podcast-tony-topping.html. The origins of the name Hospital Porters Against the New World Order were inspired by a man in America called Jack McLamb who set up a group called "Police and Military Against the New World Order" (McLamb was instrumental in resolving the Ruby Ridge incident; without his negotiating skills the whole Weaver family might have been slaughtered). I thought, if the police and military can have an organization against the NWO, why can’t hospital porters? I was very proud to be a hospital porter and considered myself an essential member of a life-saving team doing one of the most important jobs in the world. There were many who resented my feelings, in the hospital and outside it (I sometimes think we’re not meant to enjoy our jobs or be proud of them. I know people who feel guilty because they like their jobs and those who feel envious of others who do. It’s as if a job, by definition, has to be something you hate doing, a punishment for some kind of inherent crime of being. See here for more details on the hospital portering situation: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2007/12/dont-tell-em-were-porters.html). Of course my feelings were based on something that was factually correct; it is conformism alone that says hospital porters are not allowed to be proud. It's strange and disappointing that this conformism extends into the Truth movement as well. After all Gary Heseltine has an organization called PRUFOS- Police Reporting UFO Sightings, and I don't recall anybody having trouble grasping that. Nobody has ever suggested Gary is doing himself an injustice or having delusions of grandeur. For that matter, nobody ever criticized Jack McLamb for the name of his group either.
I think being in the Truth movement means standing up to all kinds of pathological authoritarianism, including psychological and cultural conformism, (I’m very much inspired by Robert Anton Wilson here, and his philosophy of discordianism) and that is one of the reasons I call HPANWO what it is; and I don't wish to change it. No matter what we do, the elite will find something to put on the laughter cue card; we saw this with the recent Channel 4 UFO programme I wrote about on the forum... a programme which I refused to have anything to do with (See here for more details: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/letters-of-complaint.html. Plum Pictures have returned The Great UFO Conspiracy to 4OD and my face is obliterated on the updated cut).
 I'm glad you appreciate my contribution, Jerry, and I hope I've explained myself to your satisfaction. Please pass on my comments to your mate and I hope he will understand too.
Kind regards
Ben

Friday, 27 March 2015

Universal Credit

The David Cameron UK Government plc are reforming the welfare state in a manner that it has never seen before in its entire seventy year history. The various benefits systems by various organizations will be consolidated into a single scheme of means testing and payment called Universal Credit. This will be operated under the Department of Work and Pensions. Its supporters claim that UC will be simpler and fairer and remove the common situation in which people have to remain unemployed because they will lose money by getting a job through its resulting benefit cuts. It’s even been compared to Basic Income, very erroneously. Basic Income involves no means testing at all and everybody gets paid the same rate regardless of their circumstances, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/basic-income.html. Because the system is so revolutionary it’s taking a long time to implement it, in fact the government estimate that the process won’t be complete until at least 2018. All the offices that currently issue housing benefit, working tax credit, child benefit and several others which are organized separately and locally, will be closed down and the Job Centre Plus will deal with everything. This means that everybody in the country who currently receives benefits will need to start from scratch. They’ll have to apply as a new claimant, and for the first time ever all people will have to register online. They’ll have to undergo “one or more” interviews at the Job Centre in order to assess their claim and they might find they’re in a very different situation as they were under the old system. The biggest difference between UC and the old system is that for the first time unemployed claimants will be not be separated from employed claimants. At the moment anybody who is unemployed has to attend the Job Centre at regular intervals and prove they are proactively looking for work in order to claim Income Support and Jobseekers’ Allowance. They often have to undergo “work experience placements”; and I’ve written about that before a lot, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/cameron-pushes-workfare.html.

On the other hand, employed people who claim benefits are generally left alone; I myself used to get Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit and Child Tax Credit. To apply for these all I had to do was take a handful of my payslips to the local government offices and fill out a form. Once I’d done that I received the payments for a whole year and there were no other conditions except that I had to sign and return a status update form annually. If Universal Credit had been introduced back then my experience would have been very different. I would have had to visit the Job Centre and be assessed in the very same way unemployed people are, even though I was employed full time in the Hospital Portering Service. If my income were too low because of a generally low rate of pay or that I wasn’t working enough hours I might be told to look for another job otherwise my UC would be “sanctioned”. It makes no difference if this were through no fault of my own. To be realistic, as a porter on full time hours anyway it wouldn’t have been a problem for me because I had a contract for thirty-seven hours a week on a top increment NHS Band 1 hourly rate which is several pounds above the minimum wage. How many people are lucky enough to enjoy conditions like that nowadays? Today millions of people work for the minimum wage on zero-hour contracts; this means that they’re paid as little as possible and their employer can give them as little work as they like. Many hundreds of thousands of people don’t even have a proper job and work for employment agencies which shuffles them from one temporary post to another. This situation would have been unthinkable twenty years ago yet today nobody thinks twice about it. Somebody in those circumstances would have to be a regular visitor at the Job Centre and could have their UC sanctioned in the same way an unemployed person could. They will be subjected to the same “robust interviews” as the unemployed. Those fortunate few on proper contracts might be forced to quit jobs they love for ones they hate just to keep their UC payments coming. Also the employment service in this country is riven with corruption and millions more will be exposed to that; I’ve talked about this issue many times, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/jobcentre-minus.html. The UC system will result in vast increase in state surveillance; people will have their privacy constantly invaded and every aspect of their lives will be scrutinized by official snoopers. The method to achieve this is already planned in the “Universal Jobmatch” system, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m7w00XQCPc. There’s no doubt claimants will be asked to produce ID and as time goes on the system will solidify into a fully-fledged database state, probably involving electronic ID, fingerprinting and even microchip implants, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/swedish-office-microchips-staff.html. Sadly there’s a lot of public support for this new system because of the “lazy scroungers” mythology that has always been promoted since the dawn of the welfare state. In recent years this kind of propaganda has got a lot worse. As Universal Credit began its long roll out, multiple programmes appeared on TV smearing people on benefits, for example see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/on-benefits-and-proud.html. I don’t think that’s a coincidence. The ultimate objective is to introduce a system of total resource-based economic control, a very extreme form of communism. A day will come when people will be born and have a tattoo branded on them that dictates what jobs they do, how much food and water they are allowed and how many carbon credits they’re entitled to; and even how long they’ll be allowed to live… unless we put a stop to it.

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

Islamification in Asda?

An article was released onto the internet on March the fourth reporting that one of Britain's largest supermarket chains was planning to withdraw alcoholic beverages from sale in some of its stores. This move effects thirteen Asda shops nationwide and is being done at branches in areas with a high Muslim population. These Asda branches are also no longer stocking other non-intoxicating alcohol-based items like aftershave and deodourants. These shops' butchers departments and delicatessens are stopping the sale of pork, bacon, ham, lard or any other product containing ingredients derived from pigs. The call for this policy was initiated by the Muslim Council of Britain and the Islamic Shariah Courts of Britain, and they welcomed this new practice by Asda, see: http://news.bfnn.co.uk/asda-to-remove-pork-and-alcohol-in-high-muslim-population-areas/ (Thanks to a Facebook friend for bringing this to my attention). The source page looks like a news story and it is intended to; the website is called BRITISH NEWS / BFNN. However, not a single word of the story is true. None of the names mentioned are real people. Although there is of course a real Asda supermarket and a real Muslim Council of Britain, there is no such organization as the "Islamic Shariah Courts of Britain". This is explained by a disclaimer at the bottom of the post. BRITISH NEWS / BFNN is actually a satirical hoax site. Some it is very funny; there are other posts entitled: Islamic State to open up Embassy in London, Cameron set to Return Falklands to Argentina by 2017 and Jeremy Clarkson said Foreign Cabs "Smell like Sick". These are clearly parodies of the jingoistic and factually precarious stories that sometimes emerge in the popular press. The intention of the website authors seems to be a desire to pull a "Carlos" style hoax on people, similar to this one: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/chemtrail-hoaxer-threatened.html. This particular prank was so successful that BRITISH NEWS / BFNN had to publish another separate disclaimer later on: http://news.bfnn.co.uk/no-asda-arent-banning-pork-or-alcohol/; they claimed that millions of people, and even a UKIP branch, Tweeted and Facebooked the story without double-checking whether it was true or false, and even didn't read the article to the end and saw the original disclaimer.

It's very amusing when something like this happens and I myself have been occasionally caught out over photos of ghosts in family photographs or set-dressers walking across the moon landing TV footage. The objective of the BRITISH NEWS / BFNN story was to test the gullibility of the British public and the entire website contains no sources and multiple disclaimers. However, there may be more to this activity than harmless comedy. I'm not accusing the authors of news.bfnn.co.uk of being motivated by anything other than a quest for mischievous fun, but there are hoaxers in this world with a graver and more sinister agenda, and news.bfnn.co.uk might be unknowingly aiding them. The Tavistock Institute is the kind of organization that would be very interested in the outcome of this trick and would treat it as a social experiment, even if that was not the objective of the perpetrators. As I've said before many times, the powers-that-be want a civil war in the UK, and indeed all of Western Europe and they're generating the conditions for war by installing radical Wahhabist Islam into the West. They're also creating and running vanguard organizations on both sides, the Muslim extremists and the anti-Islamic nationalists. Their machinations include false flag terrorist attacks, see background links below. Are these psychological warfare operations working? If you put yourself in the position of those engaged in them (not pleasant I know), how could you find out? You would need to gauge the collective consciousness of the populace in terms of anger, suggestibility and malleability. This is how psychological operatives manage to work out the best times and places to play their cards, what city to carry out a false flag shooting or bombing, which racial and class category of people should be given what subliminal messages in TV programmes etc. What days would people respond best to an airliner hijack? Incidents like this Asda Muslim hoax provide a valuable insight and you can bet the Tavistock Institute, and outfits like it, have been studying it very carefully indeed.