My Ident on Wythenshawe FM

I'm pleased to say that Sandra Shufflebottom is using my ident on The Unedited Audio Experience Show which she hosts. See here for my interview on the programme: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/ben-emlyn-jones-on-wythenshawe-fm.html. Sandra's show is really good; she is very outspoken about conspiratorial and paranormal matters and has had some problems as a result. However she has pressed on and is doing a great job. We recorded it at the Rendlesham Forest Incident Conference a few weeks ago, whioch gives it a bit of atmosphere I think. It was very easy; I just say: "I am Ben Emlyn-Jones and you're listening to The Unedited Audio Experience with Sandra Shufflebottom." You'll be able to hear it at odd intervals during Sandra's broadcasts.

See here for Sandra's online radio page: http://www.spreaker.com/user/theuneditedaudioexperience.

Bigfoot- More Evidence

Following my zombie update yesterday, I have a further one; this time concerning another subject I follow closely on HPANWO- Bigfoot. Popular Mechanics, famous for its opposition to 9/11 conspiracy theories, has stuck its oar into the unfamiliar waters of cryptozoology by covering a set of DNA tests done on hair samples nominated as coming from the Yeti also known as the Migoi or Migyhur. This is the Himalayan equivalent of Bigfoot, a large upright-standing primate living in the illusive and remote regions of the world's highest mountains. Their report is snide and sarcastic, as I'd expect from PM, but the biologist carrying out the tests is more professional in attitide. Prof. Norman MacLeod of London's Natural History Museum makes it very clear that although he has discovered that the hair people thought was the Yeti's is really that from other common and familiar animals, he doesn't rule out the presence of an unknown species of primate living in the Himalayas, see: http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/genetics/the-first-dna-test-of-yeti-samples-16945641. We have to take into account the large number of very credible witness sightings of these creatures. The lack of bodies and dung etc may be due to the fact that anything that dies in nature is quickly devoured by scavengers. I might have trouble trying to find a body of any particular animal species if I went into the woods to search for it. If these creatures exist then it's obvious that they shun human contact, the same goes for the Loch Ness Monster. What's more, as I detail in the background links below, there are distinct political reasons why a proper investigation into the presence of unknown primates might be hindered.

In 2001 a film was released called Great North, a wildlife documentary shot in IMAX. In one of the scenes we see a herd of caribou, a large deer-like animal, running along a river bank in a remote part of northern Canada. At one point a large black humanoid figure appears out of a patch of long grass and runs a few feet alongside the herd as if it's trying to hunt them. Amazingly this was not spotted during the film's editing process and was only pointed out by one of the movie's viewers in 2010. Unfortunately the range is very long and the film only reveals what Skeptics call a "blobsquatch"; they then go on to claim that the camera crew merely captured one of their own team who had wandered into the location by mistake. The reason the figure appears black is because he is a black person, or "African American" as would say more politically correct commentators than this one; and he is obviously wearing black clothes. It seems odd that an experienced wildlife photographer would dress in black when working in a grassy environment. I'd imagine DPM camouflage would be more appropriate, like hunters and soldiers wear. Anyway, the production company have not commented; nor has the alleged crew member in the frame admitted his mistake... and no doubt also accepted a bollocking from the director for ruining the shot. There's another reason for questioning the Skeptic explanation; the supposed "black film crew member" is a giant. We know because luckily he was very close to the running caribou herd when he was filmed; therefore we have a comparative gauge to judge his height. Caribou are a very large species from the deer family and can grow to five feet in height at the shoulder, the size of a small horse. When compared with a token caribou nearby the figure comes out at a minimum of eight feet tall, far larger than all but a handful of the most overgrown men in the world. He would most definitely be a legend within the circles of the wildlife cinematography profession. He would also be a Gold Medal-winning athlete. Caribou can run very fast, up to fifty miles per hour, and we can tell by watching the movement of the humanoid that it is running only slightly slower than them. Only the upper body of this being can be seen so it's literally possible that it could be a man riding a motorcycle, but this seems unlikely because its engine noise would have disturbed the caribou and alerted the film crew. Interestingly the being also appears to have a hunchback, either that or it's carrying something on its back. Many primates, including some humans, carry their babies on their backs; maybe this is a mother and child. This makes me wonder how fast the creature would be able to run without the youngster weighing her down, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzlpK5g5quk. The question of whether we share this world with unknown large apes similar to ourselves, to a greater or lesser degree, is not going to go away. More evidence keeps coming up no matter any protests to the contrary.

See here for background: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/programme-51-podcast-cryptozoology.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/bigfoot-hoaxer-confesses.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/bigfoot-seen-in-kent.html.

Zombie Update- November 2014

An almost unbelievable crime has taken place in Wales. In the early hours of last Thursday police were called to the Sirhowy Arms Hotel in Argoed, a small village in south Wales. There they came across the horrific sight of a man eating a woman. The police shot the assailant with a taser and arrested him; he later died at the scene after being treated by paramedics. His victim was already dead. She was later named as Cerys Marie Yemm a local college student who also worked at a clothes shop. The man who attacked her was Matthew Williams (not to be confused with the Welsh crop circle researcher). He had a history of violence and had just completed a prison sentence for assaulting his former girlfriend. He was living at the hotel, which was a temporary residence for the homeless and a halfway house for newly-released prisoners. It appears that he was Ms Yemm's current boyfriend. The post-mortem on her has not been completed, but it has been revealed that she suffered "severe facial injuries". William Graham, the local Welsh Assembly member, called this case "the stuff of nightmares!" There is a lot of controversy over the release of Mr Williams from jail and the lack of ex-offenders supervision over him. It immediately struck me that this horrible murder is very similar in nature to several others that have mysteriously and spontaneously broken out, for example the attack on a homeless man in Miami, Florida USA, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nhfkYQ9UfiM. Why are we seeing more and more of this behaviour? Is it connected to what I've been discussing for a long time, the possibility of real zombies emerging in our world? I've also been shown a textbook by a friend of mine who is a student at the Open University which proves that OU students are being taught about zombies as part of a course on technology and society; disturbingly it is part of a segment that talks about pandemic viruses. As you'll see in the background links and previous zombie updates, this has now become a virtually routine situation. What's going on?

See here for my previous zombie update: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/zombie-update-september-2014.html.

See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/ben-emlyn-jones-live-real-zombies.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/yet-more-zombies.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/pentagon-zombie-plan.html.

Humanity Outlawed

Don Richie lived in a house next to a cliff known as "The Gap" which faces the sea on the eastern coast of Sydney, Australia. It has developed a reputation as a suicide hotspot, a bit like Beachy Head in England. However Don is thought to have saved many lives by stepping out of his house and approaching people on the cliff who look like they might be about to jump. His counselling technique is simple and highly effective- he invites them into his house for a cup of tea. Over the forty-five years he lived in that cliff top residence he is estimated to have talked down as many as four hundred people who were on the brink of ending it all. Don died in 2012 at the age of eighty-six, but he received many awards for his actions, including the Medal of the Order of Australia, see: http://www.smh.com.au/national/an-angel-walking-among-us-at-the-gap-20090731-e4f2.html. He became known as "the watchman of The Gap". It's sad to see such a man die, even though he lived to a ripe old age. I think the main reason I mourn his loss is that had he been born a few decades later he might have lived to see the world change into something very different to the one he knew. A world in which he would be barred by law from approaching anybody who looked like they were contemplating suicide, because he was not a qualified counsellor who had undergone a Common Purpose "everyday psychology" course; after all he might get sued. Perhaps only a trained expert with the licence to prescribe Prozac should be doing that kind of thing. Am I exaggerating? I think not.

Arnold Abbott, a ninety year old man, has just been arrested in Fort Lauderdale, Florida USA for giving food to homeless people... No, I'm serious, look!: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/ninetyyearold-man-faces-jail-for-giving-food-to-homeless-people-9838728.html. As soon as he was released from police custody he went straight back and started doing it again. He was arrested again and has been charged under a new law that many cities across the United States have brought in; he could face sixty days in jail for his "crime". I think this situation ends the debate over who is really in control of this world. In recent years the question has arisen about whether the leaders who control everything are not really human and they are in fact Reptilians, Archons, "prison warder consciousness" and other definitions of alien entities. I think that they have to be. The elite may look human, they might have human bodies, human voices and exhibit human behaviour in public, but no way can they have a human soul. Carlos Castaneda wrote a series of books about his meetings with a Yaqui Indian medicine man called Don Juan Matus. In one of the books Don Juan tells Carlos: "We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don't do so... They took over because we are food for them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. Just as we rear chickens in chicken coops. Therefore, their food is always available to them. Tell me how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behaviour. Sorcerers believe that the predators have given us our systems of beliefs, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routinary, and egomaniacal. They gave us their mind! Do you hear me? The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind. The predators' mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now." I've wondered over the years, but now I wonder no longer. I think this is true. We are not fighting humans, we are fighting something entirely different, and if we continue to believe that our enemies are also our fellow humans then they will disarm us. I think there's a connection between the Reptilians, Archons etc and psychopaths. That's a controversial statement to make, but I think it has to be said, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/the-ben-emlyn-jones-show-programme-19.html. But there is good news. I'm pleased to say that there has been a public outcry against this outrage and I doubt if Mr Abbot will serve any time. I really hope not! There are many more people like Arnold Abbott and Don Richie out there. All is not lost and we must not surrender. There is still some humanity left in the human species and it is refusing to stay quiet despite being outlawed.

James Randi and the Military Industrial Complex

Skeptics are rather like political parties; no matter how much their world is falling apart they will always maintain a glossy and positive public image. The shop window looks impressive every day, even when the stock is rotten and the books are blood red on every page. Christopher Bollyn is an investigative journalist who writes for the American Free Press, which is related to Jim Tucker's now-defunct conspiratorial newspaper The Spotlight. He has written extensively on 9/11, geopolitics and conspiracy theory, and he has recently published an article on James Randi that supports a lot of my own research. At the age of eighty-six, James Randi is still very active as the grandfather and godfather of the modern Skeptic movement; famed for his critiques of Uri Geller, psychics and the paranormal. Uncontradictable, supposedly, through his Million Dollar Challenge, he styles himself as the nightmare of spiritualist charlatans, homeopathic conmen and psychic frauds. However many times I and others have lifted the veil on his lily-white persona, see background links at the bottom. Now Bollyn has found evidence of what I've long suspected- that Randi and therefore probably much more of the Skeptic milieu, is controlled by the government. Randi's organization, the James Randi Educational Foundation, was founded in 1996 with the help of a rich sponsor; Rick Adams. The foundation describes Adams as an "internet pioneer", which is literally true; however it fails to mention his connections to DARPA, the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency of the US Government. This organization is behind a wide range of military and law enforcement applications for science and technology. It's also reputed to be involved in such programmes as HAARP, chemtrails, mass-surveillance technology and transhumanism. Adams was also involved with SAIC, the Scientific Applications International Corporation, which is notorious in the world of 9/11 research. Adams is treasurer of the JREF and therefore takes care of the million dollar prize fund for Randi's legendary challenge, which is his own donated money. It took a while before this information was even made public; for a long time the rumour was that the JREF's benefactor was Johnny Carson, the TV host who supported a lot of Randi's work. The JREF pays no tax at all under US law because of its "educational" status. It's often assumed, and Randi gives the distinct impression, that the foundation is headquartered at Randi's home in Florida USA, but it's not. Its business address is actually at Rick Adams' office in Falls Church, Virginia USA. However the JREF is not the only organization based in that office, so too is General Dynamics, a major defence contractor and a part of the military-industrial complex. Another firm located at that same office address, a large building towering over Fairview Park Drive in Falls Church, is the Jose Alvarez Art Studio LLC. This is run by Jose Alvarez. Alvarez, whose real name is Deyvi Peña, is an accomplice in many of Randi's escapades of humiliating deceit and media sensationalism. For instance he played "Carlos", a fake spiritual guru, in the famous hoax Randi pulled on the people of Australia, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0hgP3ioAeA. He and Randi are a gay couple and they got married in 2011 as soon as it became legal. Interestingly Alvarez is also the cousin of Willy Rodriguez, a man who claims to have been a cleaner at the World Trade Centre and who has been sited as a witness supporting the idea that the buildings were demolished using conventional explosives; I'll explain why that is suspicious below. See here for Bollyn's article: http://www.bollyn.com/the-antidote-for-disinfo/#article_14623 (As is often the case, I have to thank Steve Trueblue for bringing this to my attention, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/programme-48-podcast-steve-trueblue.html)

However there is far more to this issue than Christopher Bollyn is saying in his story. This could be because Bollyn himself is not somebody I completely trust. He is described as a 9/11 "truther", a person who wishes to expose the conspiracy of 9/11 being an inside job; this is how he would describe himself too. Nevertheless he is very "thermitically correct" and would therefore be very hostile to what I consider the real story behind 9/11- that directed energy weapons were used. See the work of Andrew Johnson and Dr Judy Wood: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/the-911-civil-war.html. This could be why Willy Rodriguez, a relative of Randi's partner Jose Alvarez, is connected to 9/11 research. Rodriguez' testimony has been used to dispute Dr Judy Wood's evidence, so was Rodriguez only put into the story to do just that? Is he an actor just like his cousin who played "Carlos"? As Bollyn says in his bio, he has directly assisted Prof. Stephen E Jones in his supposed 9/11 research which led to the notion that the Twin Towers were destroyed by thermite charges; in my view this is false. However I think it's more than just an accidental error; it's intended to deliberately lure curious people who are sceptical of their governments off the right track to exposing the crime of 9/11. As Andrew Johnson has explained, this is not the first time Stephen E Jones' muddy footprints have been found in a scientific controversy. He was behind the debacle that led to the dismissal of "Cold Fusion", see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUnI6HzvPFk. Bollyn claims in his article that the entire reason the JREF is a front organization for the military-industrial complex is in order to suppress the truth of 9/11. It may well be the case that 9/11 reinvestigation is one of their targets, but no way does it stop there. The JREF and other Skeptic organizations like it have a much wider ranging and longer term strategic purpose. The JREF doesn't only address 9/11; it also ridicules and denies the subject of UFO's, cryptozoology, consciousness research, knowledge of the afterlife, free energy, alternative health, ghosts and much more. It supports things like GMO's, pharmaceutical medicine, atheism and man-made climate change. It basically stands by all the matters Skeptics like and dislike in general. There is a political element to all those issues, and to narrow it down to 9/11 alone is misleading. For example there's has been politically-motivated suppressions of psychics, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/helen-duncan-most-dangerous-psychic-in.html. We all know how to discredit Skeptics who support the official story of 9/11- that bin Laden did it with planes and nineteen hijackers; but we need to be wary of some of those who sound like they're on our side too. Whoever is behind 9/11 would not have overlooked the necessity to control their own opposition. What goes for 9/11 goes for all the other issues I listed above. Stay vigilant! 

See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/randi-sued-over-million-challenge.html.

And: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/other-side-of-james-randi.html.

And: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/programme-106-podcast-victor-and-wendy.html.

Compulsory WiFi

My Internet service provider is TalkTalk and until very recently I was always perfectly happy with their service; what's more I even gained a distinct sense of loyalty to them when they decided to resist the Digital Economy Act of 2010, a piece of legislation which was nothing more than an attempt at backdoor online censorship. Nevertheless I've become concerned over an element of their practice when I ordered an upgrade a couple of years ago to TalkTalk Fibre, a "super-fast" broadband service than runs on a national fibre-optic system. An engineer came to my home and fitted a new phone socket, and he dropped off a special new router to replace my old modem. There is a helpline TalkTalk customers can call where the staff all speak with a Filipino accent, suggesting that the call centre is in the Philippines; I suspect TalkTalk is therefore using cheap Third World labour. As they discussed my service with me they were very keen to show me how to run my internet access via a wireless local area network. In fact their tone was strangely overenthusiastic; I've heard from friends who have experienced the same thing. I told them I didn't need a wireless LAN because I only have my personal computer and that sits about two feet away from the phone socket where the router is plugged in, easily within reach of the five-foot Ethernet cable they provided me with. This seemed a very straightforward explanation to me, but the helpline man's reply was curious: "Are you sure you don't want to set up a wireless connection, Mr Emlyn-Jones?" It was as if he hadn't heard me; I had to repeat myself several times. Eventually he accepted the uncomfortable truth that I was happy with just a wired connection and he ended the conversation. The other reason I didn't want wireless is because I'm concerned about the health and safety aspects that have been raised over cellular transmissions, "electrosmog" and its dangers. I'm currently trying to persuade my landlord not to allow a smart meter to be installed and I've been following the research of people like Barry Trower and Deborah Tavares, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z99_SzoXZdY and: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOpCtLQIZJ8. So I plugged my PC into the router using the cable, but then I noticed that the light on the router box's display that indicated WiFi was still lit. It turned out that the wireless transmitter in the router still operates even if you're not connected up to a wireless LAN. I immediately called back TalkTalk and demanded to know how to disable it. They told me this wasn't possible. I wondered what to do and in the end decided to construct a Faraday cage to put my router in, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/tin-foil-hat.html (I found out afterwards that I didn't make it quite right because I should have fitted an earth wire to channel the current). However when I told a very IT-savvy friend of mine what had happened he was astounded. He told me that it was very easy to disable the WiFi signal on a TalkTalk Fibre router; you can access the router's driver using an ordinary web browser and this will give you the option to switch off the WiFi signal for "saving power and network security". I followed his instructions and it worked. The question is; why did TalkTalk technical support not tell me this?

Everything was fine for a while until last week when I changed my ISP package. The Filipina saleswoman offered me a 20% discount for six months and I gave way to temptation. Part of the new package was sending me a new router and TV box (not that I'll ever use that!) called a "super-router". Alarm bells rang. "Are you certain nothing else will change in my use of your services?" I asked. "Absolutely positive, Mr Emlyn-Jones. You just use the new router in the same format as your existing one." I had a very bad feeling about it even as I agreed to the offer over the phone. When the new super-router arrived I set it up and switched it on, and it worked fine, including the WiFi transmitter. I opened up the driver control to disable the signal as I had done with my old router and noticed that it was an entirely different page. I searched in vain for the WiFi toggle, but it was not there. I called TalkTalk and explained to the adviser that I wished to switch off the WiFi transmitter and that I was using a wired connection because I live in a small room, only have a single device on the router and the cable is easily adequate for that... "Why do you not want a wireless local area network, Mr Emlyn-Jones?"... I gritted my teeth and groaned inwardly. I try to be always polite to call centre staff, but I couldn't keep a twinge of irritation out of my voice, and I snapped back: "Do I have to give you a reason?" There was a pause. "Alright, Mr Emlyn-Jones. I will have to discuss this with my supervisor. Please hold the line for a few minutes." I held for two minutes and then suddenly the line went dead... Maybe we were just accidentally cut off. I called back and was put through to a different adviser and he said. "Not a problem, Mr Emlyn-Jones. I will disable your wireless signal from here... there, it's done." I looked down at the box; the WiFi light was still shining. "Are you sure? The light's still on." "Yes, Mr Emlyn-Jones. I've definitely deactivated the wireless signal on your router." I thanked him half-heartedly. I had fortunately not thrown away my old router. I pulled it out from where I'd been storing it and plugged it in. At the time of writing I'm still using my old TalkTalk Fibre router. Obviously this situation cannot last forever; the router has a limited service life. What I'll do after that I'm not sure; build another Faraday cage? Switch to a new ISP? I'll cross that bridge when I come to it. What bothers me about this saga is that that the wireless technology we have in modern society, that most people use quite willingly, is becoming more difficult not to use when you're not willing. If WiFi really is a form of electromagnetic weaponry intended to do us harm in any of the ways Trower and Tavares discuss, then the attackers wielding it could be making sure that their targets have no defence. The staff at TalkTalk may have been given instructions to pressure customers who dislike WiFi into complying. This is still an ongoing situation and I'll write an update as soon as there are more developments.

Oxon Fracking Protest

I have taken part in a protest against fracking at County Hall in Oxford, the headquarters of Oxfordshire County Council. This morning I joined a group of about twenty people gathered outside the entrance as the officials went into work. Some of them were attending a meeting about possible future fracking operations in Oxfordshire. Fracking is something which I'm very opposed to, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/bbc-horizon-does-fracking.html. The protest was organized by the local Green Party and several other groups turned up such as Friends of the Earth, Grandparents Climate Action and a few other tendencies related to the environment and climate change. I was offered some banners to hold and I choose a blank cardboard placard with the words "FRACK OFF!" embossed on it. Whoever came up with the term "fracking" must wish they'd chosen something different due to all the puns emerging thereof! There were other placards relating to the Green Party and global warming, but I didn't want to hold them because I don't believe in man-made climate change, an unorthodoxy that would make me a pariah in the eyes of some of the people present; however none of them asked me my opinion on the subject, so I never gave it. I was pleased that the man standing next to me was opposed to GMO's. Unfortunately some of the more rabid members of the environmentalist movement are now embracing genetically-modified food and even nuclear power, like Mark "6 Degrees" Lynas, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/rothamsted-update.html. I consider this all a part of Agenda 21 and similar projects, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/anything-to-save-planet.html. As the officials went in to their meeting few of them spoke to us. One or two took a flyer from the people handing them out. One of them, Liz Kearney, a long-term Labour councillor, stopped to tell us that the meeting arranged was not a debate or a decision-making event; it was just a discussion on what officials thought about fracking. A woman in the picket asked her: "Don't you care about the people then?" and Cllr Kearney angrily shouted back that she did. The point was that this is just the first stage of a process that could result in full-on commercial fracking in Oxfordshire, and we wanted them to know we'd be there all the way from the start! The media turned up, TV cameras and newspaper photographers. The leader of the protest was the Green councillor David Williams whom I respect very much for supporting and assisting the People's Supermarket before it sadly shut a few months ago, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/nisa-to-see-you.html. He did an interview in front of the TV cameras and spoke to some more of the reporters. Then several members of the protest did speeches through a megaphone; some of them made the same points that Ian R Crane does, but underlying that was the focus on fossil fuels, Carbon™ emissions and the man-made climate change worldview in general. This is a mistake I think, as I explain in the links above. It was a peaceful and good-natured demonstration and no police even bothered to watch us. At the time of posting the mainstream media has not covered this story at all, at least online. It was given a mention in the BBC Oxford live text feed and I screen-capped it along with a photo, see below. This reporter can be seen in the left-centre with the grey jersey: