BNP Mad Dogs

Nick Griffin, the leader of the British National Party, has recently made a speech in Blackpool that scared me. See: http://bnptv.org.uk/2012/06/nick-griffin-speaks-at-blackpool-rally/ . It isn't what Griffin says here that bothers me, it's the reaction of the audience. They growl and bay like angry hunting hounds; even Griffin himself ends up having to tell them to be quiet. I've written before about the BNP and my suspicions that Nick Griffin could be an MI5 asset. He went to Trinity College, Cambridge, just like Aleister Crowley and the Cambridge Spies, and could have been recruited there, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/bnp-youth-shop-window.html . Ironically... and so predictably... the principle adversary of the British Far Right, Anjem Choudary has also been nominated as an UK Intelligence agent, and this time there's some considerable evidence supporting that, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/11/poppy-burners-are-shills.html Hatred and fear of Muslims appears to be the bait that the Government is currently using in its trap. Brian Gerrish calls Muslims "the new Jews" in reference to how Adolf Hitler used the same trick with Jews on the German people to create the Nazi regime. Of course with Hitler it was a different group of people but the methods were identical. Next time it could be Norwegians or Hottentots! It doesn't matter; the ruse works just as well in every case... until we, the people, get wise to it.

This issue with "grooming" does exist and of course it does need to be stopped, but "groomers" come from all races and religions. My own cousin's daughter was targeted by groomers, but these groomers were all white Englishmen; I said this one to somebody manning a BNP street stall in London and they just turned away from me. White English groomers are currently operating under the radar thanks to this Muslim obsession of the current campaign. What's more some of this grooming, like all other forms of child abuse, is institutional and organized by the Government itself! Why don't the BNP address this? Because they're not trying to stop grooming, they're simply acting out their part of the "Hate Muslims" propaganda show, just like Anjem Choudary.

Cash-in-Hand Traders under Attack

See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18975675

The Treasury Minister David Gauke has said that businessmen who ask, or allow, their customers to pay them cash-in-hand are "immoral"; this is because cash-in-hand payments are hard to prove taxable. He says that they're "robbing the nation" of revenue. This buffoon obviously feels very differently about the countless billions the Government have given the banks! The video in the BBC news story above is happily critical, and it even includes a backlash by The Philosophers' Magazine editor and author of a great book: What's it All About?, Julian Baggini.

The real motive for Gauke's outburst is that a cash-in-hand economy is an independent economy. The Government don't like that kind of thing! See: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/04/welsh-pound.html I like the concept of an economic transaction being a personal and private affair between a tradesman and client, or employer and employee; it's one of the most vital definitions of human freedom there is. If Gauke had his way we'd no doubt be in the cashless economy, which I've warned about many times, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/11/coins-are-dropped.html and: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2009/06/big-brother-is-paying-you.html

Nurse Suspended for Facebook Posts

An NHS nurse has been suspended and now faces an investigation for posting supposed "laughable" accusations against the cottage hospital where she serves, see: http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/facebook-rant-of-biggleswade-hospital-nurse-1154377 . Keep an eye on this story; I bet Biggleswade Hospital will end up closing just as this nurse predicted.

I can sympathize with her quandary; it's different from my own only because they're being more honest with her in their motives, as they were with Tony Farrell, and not making up excuses, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/ben-emlyn-jones-live-at-ldidg.html . The rights of free speech are being removed from society very slowly and stealthily. The authorities never openly admit that's what they're doing, they just bring in a set of "social networking" rules for the sake of "professional standards". These rules start off as basic and minor, but then are added to bit by bit. The penalties for breaching these rules become more and more severe; people are made examples of and discharged or imprisoned. In the end the authorities can still state that free speech still exists and be literally correct, but it becomes such an effort, with so many pitfalls to tiptoe around, that most people just give up altogether.

Charlie Veitch's Armed Resistance

Background article: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/911-conspiracy-road-trip.html
Charlie Veitch has just uploaded a video in which he makes a very forthright and dispassionate call to arms. In his beard and furrowed brow he addresses the audience like Che Guevara; see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxLvFcHTt1I Charlie has recently begun sounding more and more bitter and despondent in his films; he comes across as disappointed, dejected and drained of all energy and hope. He has been targeted by the harshest and most widespread trolling campaign in the history of the Internet; one which I vehemently opposed. Now he has decided to give up entirely in his attempt to resist using his former methods of peaceful protest and street theatre, and take a more direct approach. "I'm tired... We've tried and we've failed" he says very bluntly.  

This gun-toting guerilla shpiel sounds all very romantic, but it's not practical. When it comes to violent human slaughter the Elite are unbeatble; they're simply too good at it! They have all the weapons, the technology, the experience... and they lack a conscience. This is why the Elite do not fear armed resistence; they even encourage it in their funding of anti-Government militias because they know those they can't corrupt and control they can easily exterminate. The Elite have far more hatred and dread for a man who buys a houseboat and paints it in an original style, and grows vegetables on its the decks, than some poser in a beret and sunglasses brandishing an AK47; See: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/battle-of-beanfield.html If Charlie is serious and he truly intends to grab a gun and rain bullets down on the Palace of Westminster then he and his band of Merry Men would be instantly vapourized by any one of the demonic devices weilded by the Elite, some of which our most horror-stricken minds have yet to guess exist. I'm not a pacifist and if I knew who the thirteen Illuminati Primi were and I really thought that shooting them would help I'd go out and do it now, but it won't help. It's futile.   

The solution instead is to keep pushing for that Hundredth Monkey point, as I've said before, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2011/08/lyall-watson.html Don't give up like Charlie has. Imagine how terrible it would be if we quit the very moment before we hit that monkey!

G4S Olympic Security "Fiasco"

Nick Buckles, the chief executive of G4S has been the subject of a Parliamentary enquiry today. This is because his company has "failed in its duty" to provide adequate security for the forthcoming London Olympics. See: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18866153

Personally I'd like to get the Academy on the phone! This looks to me like a staged charade. Buckles didn't fail, he threw it! What's more I imagine he was given some incentive to throw it, like a big cash back-hander. Why? So that the Government now has the excuse to militarize London even more than it has done already. See here for background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/london-olympic-security-measures.html

Now it looks as if spectators at the tournament will have their bags searched by military personnel, rather than a G4S security guard, and this is deliberate. It means that even if the entire Olympics goes according to plan the people will have been conditioned even further into thinking that dealing with soldiers in domestic security and law enforcement situations is normal. What I call "The Military Religion" has a big role to play in this too, see: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/02/non-military-memorials.html

BBC Horizon- Why Most of us Need to Die

I recently came across a TV show from the BBC's Horizon flagship science series. It was made in 2009 and its official current title is: How many People can live on Planet Earth. However one of the YouTube copies is entitled: Why Most of us Need to Die, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYWcSfWxaf8 Was this a former official title? I noticed that the comments box is closed! This is for reasons that will become apparent. The presenter of this programme is probably the most illustrious and prestigious one Horizon ever uses: Sir David Attenborough. This gives it a high level of perceived credibility and makes it even more chilling to watch than it would be otherwise.

The programme ends with what Attenbourough describes as a "positive note" explaining how some small regional and local areas are tackling the problem effectively by using environmentally sound water management techniques and by empowering and educating their women; but what is sinister about this programme is not what he says, but what he omits. I can hear some viewers, especially the Green pessimists among them muttering: "It's too little too late!" And the homicidal message is rammed home the very same evening this programme was first broadcast because if you watch the full length YouTube version: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN06tLRE4WE , you'll hear an advert for a second TV show that's on later; this one:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-D0VEN4ZGo Hot Planet.

My own views on this matter are described in detail here: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2011/01/overpopulation-myth.html  and here: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2010/02/pentti-linkola.html . But basically, the environmental problems of Planet Earth are not being caused by the subjects these two programmes talk about. The reason these subjects are being nominated as causes is so that people will support the New World Order: as a desperate attempt to save life of Earth!

UFO's back in the News

UFO's are back in the news! See: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9737000/9737156.stm
And: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-18797691

This has been triggered by a new release of UK Ministry of Defence UFO files. This is an ongoing programme that has been running for some time, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/05/more-british-ufo-files-released.html Somewhere in this latest batch will hopefully my own reported sighting, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/12/my-ufo-sighting-281208.html .

Supporting all the above are other related articles: There is a new angle on a famous 1977 sighting in Wales here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-18822846 and Gary McKinnon is undergoing another crucial phase of his case to fight extradition to the USA, see: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2083667/Gary-McKinnon-faces-unthinkable-ordeal-extradited-US--says-NatWest-Three-banker-hurled-American-jail-alongside-wall-wall-psychos.html

Along with the news stories has been several videoes like this one by Nick Pope. Listen to the music in the background; the mainstream news is literally incapable of treating this subject seriously!: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1UrGQ8QOJI Another regular pundit is Dr David Clarke, see: http://drdavidclarke.co.uk/ who has also been speaking in the media about the latest files release. I often wonder why it seems always to be the same small circle of characters who are shuffled and recycled between the various major news outlets like it's a pass the parcel game. Every one of these characters either believe UFO's can all be explained as non-paranormal, or that even if some can't the Government don't know any more than the rest of us; they're as bemused and wide-eyed about these invulnerable invaders of our airspace... as anybody else! When are we going to see a BBC interview with Linda Moulton-Howe or Scott Felton or Richard D Hall or Stanton Friedman; or how about Nick Redfern, the man who briefed Tony Blair when he was Prime Minister. Or one of the hundreds of other dedicated people studying this subject and with a lot of interesting angles on this subject? It's bad journalism not to expand the informational and intellectual sphere of UFO stories. But this is because the media is not designed to inform and inspire investigation. It's designed to blinker and distort people's images of subjects like UFO's. To talk about UFO's is fine, so long as the role of the Government in the issue is defined a certain way: as innocent and unknowing. As regular HPANWO-readers will know, I think this is not the case, eg: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/happy-disclosure-day.html .

There is an occasional break in the clouds. I received an excited phonecall from a friend yesterday saying that Roy Lake was on Channel 5 News. Unfortunately this programme is not currently available online, but at least he was given airtime. Roy is a far more convincing UFOlogist than any of the usual UFO celebrities; here's his site: http://www.crowdedskies.com/about_lufos.htm . How long this current UFO theme will last in the mainstream news is anybody's guess, but there's no way I'd advise anybody to think it's now OK to rely on  the BBC and ITV alone. Keep your eye on HPANWO and the other alternative sites you'll see in the Links column!