A news story has broken that is almost unbelievable. I had
to check thoroughly to make sure it was true. Fox News has reported that
President Trump has directed all US US
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.
4 comments:
Trump's second term has been an emotional rollercoaster of hopes raised and then dashed. Nothing he says can be taken seriously. At this point it's reasonable to be not only cynical but also dismissive. He has no credibility left.
Yet sometimes even the wrong people can take the right line. Tump is lost, corrupted, compromised; but here's a chance for him to pull back from the nadir. It's a first step to redeeming himseslf.
Ben, sounds like the "even a stopped clock is right twice a day" analogy there regarding your thoughts on Trump. As regards this report 'the devil is in the detail' A NDA for national security being 'waived' for the UAP legacy program whistle blowers to testify means they can openly state any military tech the US has or is aware of from other sovereign states that could be a cause of any cases witnessed without breaching national security. This would mean anything 'alien' was not part of the UAP program as discussing it would breech national security. Whistle-blowers claiming otherwise must be lying. This probably isn't lost on them so the 'backslappers' are ready to watch them squirm and make excuses. Note the difference between UAP legacy program and UFO here There is a strong possibility many recent (last decade) UAP sightings are drone tech both civilian and military. As regard the legalities you would have to assume a grand conspiracy of cover up's not be an expert in legalities to know that a directive is a request not legally binding (so the whistle blowers could choose to not attend a hearing and one or both parties could still request an NDA if they did attend). An executive order only directs federal agencies and can be challenged legally by any judge. As an example whistle-blowers could be compelled to attend a hearing legally and refuse by requesting a judge over rule the executive order ( they could claim their lives are at risk perhaps) in which case the judge overrules the executive order and nothing changes. It's all smoke and mirrors by both parties imho.
Hi Anon. More information has come to light since I wrote this and I'm aware of some of the points you've made because of this. It has been a big topic of discussion at Awake and Aware. As I suspected, this one action by the president is not enough to allow all and every person in the breakaway civilisation to join Ross Coulthart on the News Nation. They can now have meetings with AARO and PERSUE outside the usual SCIF's. I also do not believe what they've said before are excuses, as Andy from that UFO Podcast has rightly pointed out. Following the fate of several people connected to the programme like Jim Sullivan, I expect their concerns run even deeper. I don't believe the whistleblowers claiming otherwise are lying for many reasons that I've addressed many times before. In fact the very fact we've not had an immediate rush supports that. It also questions your suggestion that drones explain a large proportion of UAP sightings, again for reasons I've detailed many times. I know what "directive" means and that's another of my criticisms of the backslappers. They are defining the word wrongly and accusing people of making excuses. I know that even an executive order can be overruled by the judiciary. It happened with Trump's order that was badly nicknamed "the Muslim ban". Whistleblowers can be subpoenaed though. Neil McCasland had been apparently issued one when he disappeared....
Post a Comment