Whether you love or hate him, nobody can say Nigel Farage
ceases to surprise. He is one of the most capricious, and dare I say
inconsistent, politicians Britain
has ever had. He began his career as a hero for Brexiteers, long before the
word had ever been coined. He then caused a split in his original party, UKIP,
and founded the Brexit Party. This is technically a company owned primarily by
Farage, but the electoral commission did accept it as a political party so it could
run in elections. In 2021 it changed its name to Reform UK, a silly name in my
opinion. Shortly after this, but not as a result, Nigel announced his second
retirement from politics his first being the day after the 2016 Brexit referendum
victory. Richard Tice took over as leader and became most notorious for sacking
a number of candidates because Hate Not Hope ordered him to, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/05/gb-news-vs-ofcom.html.
Now, as we approach the eighth anniversary of Referendum Day, on the third of
June, Nigel announced his return to the throne of Reform UK. What was really
bizarre was that just a few weeks earlier he had revealed plans to abandon Britain
altogether and travel to America
to campaign for Donald Trump in this year's US
presidential election. He admitted this was a mistake, which is admirable; it's
far more than most politicians do. His reason for changing his mind is that he
has seen "a rejection of the political class" in this country and he
wanted to be a part of that revolt. He said the surge in Reform's popularity
was "a new phenomenon" and he is encouraged by opinion polls on the
continent ahead of the upcoming European Parliamentary elections for hard right
populists like himself. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdnzlDZ12pk.
Will I vote for Reform? Well if you look through their
manifesto, see: https://www.reformparty.uk/our-contract-contents,
I agree with almost all of it. I don't think we should abolish the House of
Lords, but I am very keen that we should scrap HS2, stop NHS privatization and leave
the ECHR, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2023/10/hs2-north-scrapped.html.
However, will Nigel Farage reinstate the candidates unfairly dismissed by
Richard Tice? Will he apologize to them? A friend of mine and former UKIP
activist, Daniel Bostock, has stated that he feels Farage betrayed the UKIP
members in a similar way to Tice, see: https://www.bitchute.com/video/HZLaKdIzE6Q/.
Is Reform nothing but controlled opposition? Possibly. I am suspicious of how
Farage seems to be tolerated far more by the establishment than other populists
like Jeremy Corbyn and Donald Trump. The answer is no, I will not be voting
Reform UK. If I vote at all in this upcoming election it will be for another
small party or an independent. If the IOA stand a parliamentary candidate I
might support them again, see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/05/i-backed-winner.html.
Nigel is standing in the Clacton constituency. He has
replaced the previous candidate from his own party, Anthony Mack; who is now
challenging Farage as an independent. Nigel has never been elected before; some
define him as the most influential statesman who has never sat in office. It is
likely this safe Tory seat will flip purple. We will see. As far as the
election goes generally, I don't think I will cover it in any detail; it will
simply be too boring! Labour is going to win, but their victory will be very pyrrhic
and anticlimactic. The electorate are not backing Keir Starmer because they are
captivated by his dream for a better Britain .
No, they probably regard him as a corrupt slimy greasy haired knob just like I
do. Labour will win by the default of apathy. The turnout is going to be a record low and most of the voters who backed
Boris in 2019 will just stay at home or vote Reform. Maybe the despair of the
outcome will be a lesson for us all. Democracy
is one of the biggest buzz-words in the English language; it is loaded down
like no other with emotional and cultural baggage. Wars have been fought over
democracy which have cost the lives of millions. Some people will start weeping
at the very mention of the word. The quest for democracy has produced some of
the most dramatic tales in history. Yet most democratic countries, even very
old democracies, are suffering from a terrible malaise. Democratic governments
have a catastrophic credibility problem in their relationship with their
citizens; some political leaders even have approval ratings in single figures. Citizens
now usually vote for negative reasons instead of positive; meaning they'll vote
for somebody they don't like in order to keep somebody they like even less out
of office, rather than to try and elect somebody they do like. Democratic
countries today are ruled by some of the most loathsome people imaginable;
cruel, cowardly, weak, gutless, heartless, stupid, selfish and deceitful.
Despite the fact that nominally we can "choose our leaders", these
kinds of people always rise to the top and nobody seems to know why, let alone
how to stop them. This malaise is growing. I can only hope that the obvious
perception of the problem will finally generate a solution.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/10/brexit-portal.html.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2019/10/brexit-portal.html.
I totally agree Ben! 🐺
ReplyDeleteThanks for your thoughts Ben. Am inclined to agree. More and more I think Plato was onto something re; his antipathy towards 'democracy'. (If he ever existed 🤔).
ReplyDeleteChanging subjects, how was the UsmS
Hi Anon. Do you mean Contact in the Desert? It went very well thanks. I've made a HPANWO TV video about it.
ReplyDeleteIt's interesting that a lot of the problems we face in modern politics were understood by wise people more than two thousand years ago. I hope we don't have to wait another two thousand before we work it out!
Thanks Ben. Good observations as always. Am inclined to be less enthusiastic re; democracy as I get older (& wiser???). Am starting to think Plato was onto something - if he ever existed!
ReplyDeleteIn other news. How was the desert conference? Did you get to speak to Timothy H about the Johnny Enoch situ??? Asking for a friend 😉
Thanks, Anon. I never met Timonthy. I wanted to talk to Linda MH as well and couldn't. There were so many people there it's easy to miss somebody in the crowd. Jonny unfortunately couldn't get there. He was ill and stayed at home.
ReplyDeleteInteresting views. I've always seen Farage as using politics as a 'grift' lining his own pockets (like many others) in the same way as he did with Brexit (Aaron Banks and his dubious sources bank rolling him), forming a business rather than a political party (Reform don't have members they have people that donate a fee but without a say unlike other 'real parties') and flip flopping his ideas following the cash. I tend to think this was the main reason for not backing Trump this time around as Trump is in a tricky spot financially and politically so maybe not a coincidence Farage changed his mind once the guilty verdict came in!
ReplyDeleteI disagree in any Labour victory being Pyrrhic however. They are loosing nothing in this election. They could potentially have the biggest majority ever and be dangerous in their absolute power to pass legislation if the conservatives are wiped out. It mirrors the US in the majority voting for the least less liked alternative (Trump or Biden) as they did previously without any other viable option.
Thanks, Anon. I did go through a pro-Farage phase during the Brexit campaign. This is despite some red flags, like his coalition of convenience with Trump that came and went according to how useful it was for Nigel. He also reckless comments apparently supporting a second referendum.
ReplyDeleteI do maintain though that Labour can never truly win in this situation. We've seen that there is a karmic element to political corruption, as Biden's lame duck presidency has shown. Labour may have their majority, but the lack of credibility over the nature of the election will hang over them in one form or another.
What is the difference between the Heritage Party and Reform? Also did you see video clip of Kier Starmer being asked about Westminster or Davos in a mainstream TV interview? His immediate answer was Davos, which shows where his loyalties lie! At least he was being honest! Most of the normies watching that probably have never heard of Davos.
ReplyDeleteHi Snarnok. So far David Kurten has not given in to HNH like Tice did. I saw that interview. Starmer didn't even hesitate or look embarrassed, like he knew he could get away with it.
ReplyDelete