The number of homeless people in Oxford
has increased enormously in the last few years for various reasons that I
detail in the background links below. It's very sad to see so many people
sitting on street corners and sleeping in shop doorways in the city centre. The
University has come up with an idea to help them. All homeless people in the
city will be registered on an electronic database and will be issued with an identity
card displaying QR-tags, a form of barcode. Then when a passer-by wants to give
them some money they can do it using their mobile phone. They scan the barcode
and send the person some funds which will be put into an account controlled by
the person's case worker who makes sure it is spent on food, rent, passport
fees or utility bills and not drugs or alcohol etc. The donor will be able to
access the database of the person they've just donated to and learn all about
him or her (usually him), how they became homeless, what their last job was
etc. Source: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/08/08/homeless-people-wearing-barcodes-new-project-increase-donations/.
This sounds benevolent at first glance; however there are major problems with
it. It means that to be homeless means living in a miniature cashless society. This
could be a trial run to expand the scheme into other areas, including people
who are not homeless; such as the unemployed, immigrants, probationers, drug
addicts, the mentally ill etc. After that, why not just say: "What the
hell, let's just put everybody on the scheme and be done with it?" This is
not the first time that homeless people have been used in pilot schemes for
Orwellian social systems. In fact in the United
States a local authority offered to insert
microchips into the bodies of homeless people. This was said to be for their
own good. It would allow shelter workers to scan the people and know about the
care they had received; when they had last slept in a shelter, been given a
meal, been given medical or dental checkups etc, see: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/01/under-the-skin-how-insertable-microchips-could-unlock-the-future.
I know that there are good intentions behind these ideas, but when it comes to
Big Brother we have to deal with capabilities, not professed intents. We must
ask ourselves how this technology could be abused or weaponized. As for the
homeless in Oxford ; why don't the
University simply pay to give them a bed for the night? It's something they
could easily afford... many time over.
See here for background:
https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2018/03/fines-for-being-homeless.html.
Hi everybody. I must apologize because I accidentally deleted a legitimate non-troll comment. Somebody suggested empty military barracks be used as accommodation for the homeless. Good idea!
ReplyDeleteVery good article Ben. I would not trust Oxford University on this, who seem to be more interested in their Athena Swan awards than anything else these days. The practical help is far more important but being unglamorous and unrewarded would be of no use to the dons.
ReplyDeletePutting homeless people in military barracks is not a good idea. Pulling down the barracks and building flats for homeless people is though.
ReplyDeleteRick
Hi Ben, thanks it was my comment. A regiment of former homeless guys I think would be a fantastic idea. A lot of ex army become homeless so the army must get involved. It has a duty of care. I'd rather be a soldier fighting for Queen and Country than a homeless drug addict. Better to give your life for something worthwhile. The cultural marxists will complain but I say let them! Cheers now. Steve
ReplyDeleteThanks, Laurence.
ReplyDeleteRick, the two are essentially the same.
ReplyDeleteSteve. I'm glad to say the military does provide support for homeless veterans, not enough but they're making a start. There is also the Royal British Legion and Help for Heroes. They put the NHS to shame quite frankly! Once you're out they want nothing more to do with you.
ReplyDeleteI think it's more about people voluntarily giving homeless their money, rather than some entity (government, colleges etc)
ReplyDelete