See here for
essential background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/07/rdh-lawsuit-mini-portal.html.
The judge has ruled in favour of the claimants. Mrs Justice Steyn has decided that Richard broke Section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Source: https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/martin-hibbert-and-another-v-richard-d-hall-2/. Obviously, for reasons I detail in the background, this is an abomination. Sadly it is not unexpected. I don't know what happens next, but I know Richard will carry on fighting. This ruling will trigger a worrying new process in Common Law in which other people can be sued for doing what Richard did; that is, vocally doubt the official story of terrorist atrocities. Who will be next? Me? At least nobody can kid themselves anymore that there are no conspiracies to silence dissenters.
The judge has ruled in favour of the claimants. Mrs Justice Steyn has decided that Richard broke Section 1 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Source: https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/martin-hibbert-and-another-v-richard-d-hall-2/. Obviously, for reasons I detail in the background, this is an abomination. Sadly it is not unexpected. I don't know what happens next, but I know Richard will carry on fighting. This ruling will trigger a worrying new process in Common Law in which other people can be sued for doing what Richard did; that is, vocally doubt the official story of terrorist atrocities. Who will be next? Me? At least nobody can kid themselves anymore that there are no conspiracies to silence dissenters.
I agree the case was so narrow , and the idea that people are offended by the book or video Richard produced or that he harassed them is silly 🤪 .i urge Richard to appeal this verdict.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely, Gordon and I'm sure Richard will.
ReplyDelete