Andrew Johnson vs Ashton Forbes

 

Andrew Johnson has decided after some deliberation that he does not like Ashton Forbes. This is hardly surprising because Andrew Johnson dislikes almost everybody. He is famous for being one of the most misanthropic Truthers there is. Even by the standards of the backslapper community, he is an extreme example. I have lost count of the number of people he has mercilessly denounced, people who often deserve better. He will flip out against anybody for even a minor failure of one of his ideological purity tests. I myself have broken all contact with him, although in my case it is over a strictly personal quarrel, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2021/03/ian-r-crane-memorial-livestream.html. Andrew first came across Ashton Forbes around the same time I did, about a year ago. Andrew was, as usual, suspicious. He made the point that Ashton is an IT consultant for the military. Not true; Ashton works in healthcare, not that that would be a reason to reject Ashton anyway, but this is what Andrew is implying. Despite this, Andrew was at first positive. However, a few months later he announced that he had been persuaded by debunkers similar to the Corridor Crew. He thus began that inevitable slide down into his typical rabbit hole, believing Ashton is doing a "muddle up". (That is actually a very unoriginal and fashionable concept at the moment, but it is wrong; see here for details: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2024/09/area-51-by-annie-jacobsen.html.) In my view, Ashton has successfully "rebunked" (his own expression which I love!) the Regicideanon videos. Andrew went "backwards and forwards" for a while, which is uncharacteristic for Andrew; normally he does not suspend judgement for long. This changed when somebody asked Ashton for his opinion of the alternative ideas related to 9/11 and Ashton was very negative about the subject. Andrew then did his Andrew thing. I think Andrew is being unfair and excessively hasty in condemning Ashton. Ashton's response to the question is not one that supports the official narrative; planes, nineteen hijackers etc; he just states that it is something he doesn't want to address right now. What's wrong with that? Why should Ashton be a human jukebox for backslappers? But of course it was too late. Andrew has already added Ashton's name to that long, long, long blacklist of his. Source: https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2024/10/22/rdh-update-ashton-forbes-mh370-update-ufo-disclosure-update/.

To be fair, there is backslapping going on on both sides of this debate. I recently posted a picture on Facebook of a bookshelf full of copies of Dr Judy Wood's Where Did the Towers Go? Tony Rooke commented underneath. I was surprised because Tony Rooke has been fairly quiet in recent years following his noble stand against the BBC for their lying documentary about 9/11. There was some concern raised because of some people in masks who turned up with "thermitically correct" banners at his trial. Source: https://www.theargus.co.uk/news/10252479.sussex-man-refuses-to-pay-tv-licence-over-911-documentary/. Tony then produced a documentary of his own called Incontrovertible. This sounded like a play on titles against Dr Wood's Irrefutable, see: https://rumble.com/embed/v58ds2r/. I went to review the premier on Tony's film, see below. Tony replied to my picture of Dr Wood's book: "Nearly four thousand qualified architects and engineers disagree... A pretty book of fiction. But yes, it was an inside job." I responded: "The truth is not an election. I've looked at both sides of that debate and disagree." Tony replied to that: "It's a free world, Ben...(allegedly)." That sounded a reasonable enough point posited in a calm and respectful manner; and I was about to continue the conversation, but he blocked me. It seems that there are intolerant and narrow-minded people wherever you look.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2024/05/mh370-portal.html.
And: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2021/09/911-portal.html.