Friday, 28 June 2024

New UFO Evidence

 
The pace of the UFOlogical news cycle is still quite quick. Just a couple of weeks after the fresh information that broke out at Contact in the Desert, see: https://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.com/2024/06/ben-in-desert.html, a new revelation has emerged. This has happened at what some would say is a very convenient time to get bums on seats. The MUFON Symposium 2024 is starting in two weeks time and on the 18th they released a press statement promising a massive bombshell exclusive to the event. This will include results of lab tests on some unknown material related to UFO's that was found by an investigator in Russia. Some of this material was stolen from a postbox while being sent to MUFON. I must add that if you have something of that nature in your possession and you want to send it somewhere, you should always use a trusted security courier. Popping a parcel in the mail is asking for trouble. Some of it is still safe though... I hope! Ron James, the symposium organizer, will put it on display for conference attendees. Let's hope that doesn't also "get lost". Source: https://x.com/blackvaultcom/status/1803404158311211036. Shortly after that, the photo you see above also appeared on social media which is also going to be presented properly at MUFON and in Ron James' new film and a book. It was shown on the Vetted podcast when Ron held up a print of it in front of the camera. It appears to show a flying saucer on the ground in a forested area by a body of water. The object might be half submerged. Unfortunately the image itself is still not available and even the one Ron holds up is a copy. The whereabouts of the original is unknown. A reproduction was published before in a new book called Ominous by Wayne Sturgill. This was supposedly taken in 1955 after a UFO was shot down following a battle with USAF warplanes. There is another photo of the disk that has supposedly been shown privately to Michael Schratt. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vVytK0RnNU. Unfortunately there's not a lot I can say about that image right now, no matter how tantalizing it is. The original negatives and prints are lost. What's more, the details in the image are indistinct. Obviously if it is real it will have been taken secretly from a distance; a photographer in that situation would not be in a position to fiddle with the focus and exposure settings for too long. Naturally the skeptics got to work and quickly found some toy soldiers for sale that look a bit like the human figures in the picture. They therefore dismiss the photo as a sham, a miniature scene with models. It's not clear enough to be sure, but that might be the case. Sometimes even the skeptics are right. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bm71rg9GzoY. We'll have to wait and see.
 
This period of synchronicity took itself up to another level when somebody claimed that the Nazca mummies are now apparently real aliens. This astonished me because I interviewed Steve Mera a couple of months ago and I thought this case was closed. I was convinced the objects were fakes made from human and animal bones, see: https://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.com/2023/11/hpanwo-show-527-podcast-steve-mera.html. A Dr Richard O'Connor has come forward to dispute that. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x32g3hEKhDs. As soon as I saw him I thought he looked familiar, and he is. At Contact in the Desert I had a friendly but robust debate with him during the open mic session. I have no final answers to any of these puzzles so this is an interim report. I'll have to write some more when more information comes to light.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.

at

4 comments:

  1. Gravity Mirror29 June 2024 at 08:42

    It is a good thing that some of your loyal YouTube viewers questioned the meaning of the word 'backslapper' on the Assange Freedom livestream. Sometimes it can be useful to pack an entire paragraph of meaning into one colourful, relatable word. At the same time there is a danger of using 'backslapper' in the same way that feminists use 'mysogynist', as a generic slogan to sweepingly dismiss half the people who disagree with you without looking at what each one is saying in detail and the differences between them.

    To take the analogy further, feminists are using 'mysogynist' as an ad hominem slogan to infer that all their opponents have a single motivation, hatred of women, and to completely avoid engaging with the substance of their arguments. By comparison 'backslappers' would all be motivated by a cynical notion that there is no truth or honesty anywhere, ever, and that everything we observe is essentially a deception.

    I'm not sure it's possible to define such a group of people. Most conspiracy-wise people would be backslappers on some issues and not others (I would).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ben Emlyn-Jones29 June 2024 at 12:58

    Hi GM. I suppose I should provide more of an explanation on the Voice which has a largely different audience to HPANWO TV. A backslapper just means somebody who gives three different answers to two questions. 1. Name a person in the Conspirasphere and the backslapper will say one of two things. Either: "He's an agent, man. He's working for MI5" or "He's naive, man! He's being fooled by agents!". 2. Name a subject in the Conspirasphere and the backslapper will reply: "That's a psyop, man!" The implication being that only they in their ivory tower are superior enough to see it and everybody else is inferior.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ben Emlyn-Jones29 June 2024 at 15:38

    PS, on reflection I've made and edit to substitute "backslappers" with "skeptics". It's not only less inflammatory, it's more factually accurate.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gravity Mirror29 June 2024 at 19:04

    Thank you for clarifying this. The definition you've given is much narrower and more precise than I had understood from videos. I thought it meant anyone who gets into a purity spiral with a conspiracy theory and draws hyperbolic conclusions unwarranted by the evidence. Examples would be the 'no planes' people with 9/11 and the 'no virus' people with the plandemic. The feminist/misogynist analogy in my comment doesn't hold water (and is quite insulting) so I must apologise for that.

    Given that there are people with an excessive tendency to explain everything in terms of shills and psyops and who are complacent about their own level of understanding, it's not unreasonable to have a word to describe them and for that word to have some negative connotations!

    ReplyDelete