Tower Fire in Brazil

A large block of flats has collapsed due to fire in Brazil. The twenty-six storey Wilton Paes de Almeida Building in Sao Paulo caught fire on Tuesday night. The residents were evacuated, however sadly not everybody could escape and at least one person perished. The death toll will probably, sadly, rise seeing as many of the residents were squatters. A hundred and seventy firemen tackled the blaze, but could not prevent the tower, put up in 1961, from totally falling apart. The fire was caused by a gas explosion and spread quickly through the makeshift wooden partitions installed to turn the former police station into residential units. It only took an hour and a half for the fire to consume the entire building to the point where the structure failed. The Wilton Paes de Almeida Building was a steel-framed oblong tower with four large internal support columns. The rubble fell into the building's own footprint and some moderate damage was done to a church next door and several more nearby buildings. Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-43973788. For believers in the official story of 9/11, this event sounds like a vindication. Indeed Metabunk.org have said as much, see: https://www.metabunk.org/s%C3%A3o-paulo-high-rise-fire-and-collapse-wilton-paes-de-almeida-building.t9684/. After a whole parade of no-shows, see background links, it seems we finally have a long-awaited repeat of the WTC disaster.

Does this then mean that because the Brazilian tower was destroyed in this way then it proves that the WTC could have been destroyed the same way? No. In fact there are a number of important differences. Firstly it is clear from the video recording of the collapse that the fire was far more extensive in the Brazilian tower than in WTC 1, 2 and 7. The WTC towers were far bigger than the Wilton Paes de Almeida Building. Building Seven was almost twice as tall, at forty-seven floors. The Twin Towers had a hundred and ten floors each. What's more the pile of rubble for the WTC buildings was far smaller than it should have been. Ironically, it was actually about the same height as the remains of the far smaller Brazilian tower; this should make people think. The Wilton Paes de Almeida Building clearly fell to the ground in flaming pieces; it did not turn into a cloud of dust. So this latest disaster is not evidence to support the official story of 9/11 at all.

See here for background: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/another-911-no-show-in-dubai.html.

And: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/03/programme-181-podcast-andrew-johnson.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2009/02/another-wt7-no-show.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/tower-block-fire-in-russia.html.

And: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/grenfell-tower-fire.html.