During the summer's EU referendum I covered the desperate mass
political manipulation that attempted to subvert the will of the people, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/programme-193-podcast-eu-referendum.html
and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/vote-leave.html
and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/vote-leave-2-count.html
and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/brexit-reality.html.
By far the most suspicious incident in this dirty campaign was the murder of
the pro-EU Rt. Hon. Jo Cox MP. Its perfect timing and emotional overkill
probably knocked two or three percent off the Leave vote total. There are two
main strands of theory for those, like me, who question the official story; I
call them "hard" and "soft". The soft theory is the one I
find more probable and it says that the murder of Jo Cox was a planned
psychological operation carried out by a trained assassin and that a fabricated
story was implanted into the media when reporting on it; with Thomas Mair
playing the role of the Lee Harvey Oswald-style patsy. The hard theory states
that Jo Cox is still alive and the entire event never happened. She's
presumably living under a false identity a long way from her previous home.
Mark Devlin subscribes to this in my recent interview on his show, see at 6.26:
http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/08/ben-emlyn-jones-on-mark-devlins-good.html.
To be honest, I can't rule it out. A very similar situation to Brexit has
emerged in the United States of America
that has caused me to disagree with the bulk of the conspirasphere. The
prevailing view among the conspiratorial media is that the current US
presidential election is no different to any other, in that we see two establishment
puppets being put up against each other in a charade so we can vote for one or
the other; and we have another strike chalked up for the fraud of democracy. I
don't think that's the case this time. There was certainly an agenda to propose
two controlled clones, but this failed. Some spanner or other has been thrown
into the works of their schemes and an unintended candidate reached the final
match, one Donald J Trump. In the background links below I charted Trump's
progression through the primaries and caucuses; and at every stage I predicted
the engineered downfall of Trump... but it never happened. There are many reasons
to suspect that the current success of Donald Trump is an aberration. His
campaign is mostly self-financed, as opposed to the massive donations Hillary
Clinton has received from various high level interested parties such as George
Soros, the Rothschilds and the Saudi royal family. This is of course because
Trump is very rich through private means. His propaganda machine is also mostly
independent and decentralized. It relies a lot on internet social media and
word-of-mouth. Clinton , on the
other hand, has the entire mainstream press behind her with such obvious bias
that it is palpable. Hillary is the new darling of the neoconservative movement
and the Israel
lobby... if those are not merely synonyms, whereas Trump has been angrily
rejected by all of them, from heads of Zionist think tanks to bloggers. This
has put me at odds with many other NWO researchers who have cried out that
everything I've just said is just another deeper layer of the mind control
operation to convince me that Trump is our saviour; and that I'm a
"shill" and/or a "sheeple" for swallowing it. Firstly, I'd
like to ask those people: what would an anti-establishment candidate look like
if the existing evidence for Trump being one is not enough? Secondly I don't
believe that Trump is our saviour. I'm not saying he's a "good guy"
or any kind of "white hat". Nothing he has said indicates that he is
planning to expose the real New World Order agenda in full. I'm not telling
anybody to go out and vote for him. I'm just saying that he is not owned by the
globalists and has still become a presidential candidate; and this indicates
that something has gone badly wrong with their machinations. That is
encouraging no matter who that candidate is and no matter what he stands for. In
a fair election there's no doubt Trump would wipe the floor with the Wicked
Witch of the White House. The mainstream polls blare continuously about how Hillary
is ahead, but as Stefan Molyneux and Bill Mitchell point out here, all the real-world
signs are there that Trump will win a fair election, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCb_lmE1SJ0...
but the American people are not going to have a fair election. The powers-that-shouldn't-be
are going to commit electoral fraud. The polls will be rigged, and I'll be
saying more about that in a future article. However before the scales are
unbalanced in that more brazen and direct way, there's going to be a massive
amount of the most ruthless and daring propaganda; and this will become more
and more frenzied as the date of the election draws closer. This, I believe,
will include the American equivalent of the Jo Cox murder. It might take the
form of a Trump supporter, complete with a Pepe the frog T-shirt, Confederate
flag tattoos and crew-cut hair, running into a school full of black children
and shooting them all dead yelling "Trump for president!" over and
over again as he is arrested and dragged away by the police. Alternatively a
low-level politician might get assassinated by a similar character; probably
the victim will be female and from an ethnic minority; some backwater state assemblywoman
or senator. Then again, more extreme measures might be in order.
Recently Wikileaks has published a huge number of emails
belonging to John Podesta, Hillary Clinton's campaign manager; I discuss some
of them here: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/ufo-disclosure-2016-wikileaks.html.
One of the haul, which emerged after that video was made, includes a PDF of a highly
confidential report of a survey carried out for the Clinton Foundation by the
Benenson Strategy Group. This appears to be some kind of psychological think
tank, a bit like the Tavistock Institute. Michael Salla thinks it's possibly a hoax, but if so then it's incredibly elaborate and done by somebody on the inside. A read-through of its mission
statement reveals a lot: "The Benenson
Strategy Group is a strategic research consultancy that marries language
expertise with innovative research to frame choices so that your brand is the
only answer. We advise global corporations, political leaders, and institutions
in dynamic, competitive scenarios. We understand the rhythm and nuances of
language and words. We give you the right words to use and much more. We map
the competitive landscape so you know where to play and how to win. We give you
the messaging framework and strategic roadmap so that everyone in your
organization knows 'why' the messaging is powerful and how it will help you
achieve the outcomes you want." No, that doesn't make any sense to me
either. The most sinister organizations always have about-pages that are as
meaningless as that. Anyway the report is entitled Salvage Problem and every page is footnoted with: "Do not
distribute- Do not copy". It admits that the official polls published on
TV and in the newspapers are inaccurate and are misleading the electorate; also
that they are intended to do so as a mass psychological weapon. The true
situation is that Trump is well ahead. More sinisterly, the document laments
that so many people have become aware of the Democratic Party's vote-rigging operations
that I'll discuss in the future article. Even the minority of voters who
support Hillary do not admire her as an inspiring leader and are only doing so
out of a distrust of Trump or sheer habit. The survey also indicates that the possibility
of electoral fraud being carried out has broken through the glass ceiling of
the alternative community and that the general public are aware of it. Over a
quarter of people said that the election rules should be changed to take account
of the risk. 22% even said that officials from Russia
should monitor the process! On the next page comes the really creepy stuff; the
document hints that the election itself should be interfered with to discourage
the Trump-supporting demographic from voting at all. They asked the people they
surveyed what would stop them going out and voting, and the answers were
everything from long queues to a Biblical apocalypse. The most likely scenario
that would keep them at home and away from the polling stations would be an
attack by extraterrestrials at 38 %. Therefore the Benenson Strategy Group
recommends a solution they call "FIRESIGN" which is something I've
never heard before, but it looks similar to Project Bluebeam. It creates
holographic images in the sky. It has been developed by NASA and the US Department
of Defence and has apparently been tested "in the Levant" (Iraq) by
displaying 3D religious icons on a layer of sodium vapour in the upper
atmosphere and its imaging can cover hundreds, or even thousands, of square
miles. The recommended use in this case is for a fake alien invasion to be
staged in order to scupper the election and allow President Obama to "hand over the torch to Clinton , providing a basic continuity of state.";
meaning a state of emergency... temporary of course. The article then discusses
the aftermath of the fake invasion stating the need for "the psychological subjugation of areas where uprisings are most
likely to occur. The induced trauma of FIRESIGN will provide ample cover to government
and NGOs who will be 'providing aid' (psychotropic to induce docility) and counselling
services which will ensure further domestication." I can guess what
these "counselling services" involve. (Source: http://media.wix.com/ugd/0cf371_514bfe6a2dec4871ab7da7d50b9be410.pdf)
In 2012 I believe there was a plan to stage a fake alien invasion during the
London Olympics, either at the opening or closing ceremonies, see: http://hpanwo-radio.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/programme-9-podcast-ian-r-crane.html
and: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/2012-london-olympic-stadium.html.
This attack was aborted because too many people were expecting it. False flag
terrorism has to come out of the blue and "shock and awe" the
populous. I hope that by getting the word out about this new conspiracy I can
help put a stop to it again.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/will-donald-trump-be-murdered.html.
Hi Ben
ReplyDeleteCheck out what veteranstoday.com have to say about Trump, it may well change your line of thought about the guy. I'm not a Clinton fan nor a Trump hater, I am not even sure that Duff's work is accurate but with anything in the conspiracy sphere we take it all with a pinch of salt.
Will do, Anon.,
ReplyDelete