The last batch of reports from the UK Ministry of Defence's
UFO desk have been rejected for declassification by state auditors. The
documents, dubbed the "British X-Files", have been long anticipated
by UFO researchers. It's been speculated that they might contain the smoking
gun when it comes to the Rendlesham Forest Incident of 1980. The MoD has been
releasing its UFO records in a series of phases since 2008 and this process is
almost complete. For personal reasons I'm particularly interested to read the files
pending publication at the moment because somewhere within them is my own
sightings report, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/my-ufo-sighting.html.
There is not necessarily anything sinister involved in file auditing and the
censorship of some material. The reason for a lot of it might be due to the
1998 Data Projection Act because it includes personal details about the
witness; their home addresses etc. Nick explained this at a live lecture of his
I once attended, see: http://hpanwo.blogspot.co.uk/2008/06/now-thats-weird-conference-2008.html.
However in this case the government has given a specific reason why: "Unfortunately, following the transfer
of files to the National Archives in June, additional information which is
covered by FOI exemption was identified, resulting in the files being returned
to MoD in August." "FOI" means the Freedom of Information
Act. This could be almost anything from an old lady's mobile phone number to
major evidence of UFO presence whose secrecy is deemed essential to national
security. Source: http://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/722373/UK-UFO-X-files-sent-back-MoD-CENSORSHIP.
The most interesting part of this news story is the comment by Nick Pope: "For the MoD to send these UFO files
to The National Archives, only for them to be sent back to the MoD, is
unprecedented. I worked on the MoD's UFO project, wrote many of the documents
that have already been released, and made the official announcement that
started the entire release project, and yet even I don't know what's going on
here. Bear in mind that for years the MoD told Parliament, the media and the
public that this subject was of very limited interest and of no defence
significance, yet suddenly these files are being treated with the same sort of
sensitivity that you'd expect to see if they contained Britain's nuclear
secrets. All this is taking place in the run-up to the US Presidential election, with WikiLeaks
revelations showing that discussions about UFOs have taken place at the highest
political level in America . This whole situation is like something out of The X-Files." For
Nick Pope to make a statement like this is frankly out of character. His
attitude towards this matter is only slightly milder than my own (I would have
used the word suspicious as well as unprecedented). He has always been very
defensive of his former employers in the past. Could this be because he now
lives in the United States of America
where they can no longer "get at him"? I agree that the halting of
the file release process comes at a very ground-breaking time period in
UFOlogy, at least on the surface. We have the WikiLeaks revelations as well as
the continuing drive by Stephen Bassett and the Paradigm Research Group for
full UFO Disclosure, see here for details: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/ufo-disclosure-2016-wikileaks.html.
Could this be a coincidence? If so then when... or if... the withdrawn files are ultimately released there will be no
clues in them at all. It'll simply be more of the same,
man-walking-dog-on-Cannock-Chase-sees-ball-of-light-in-sky, kind of thing.
Either that or when you read them out loud they will sound something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EcRMpRfhQk.
See here for
background: http://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/ufos-back-in-news.html.
Why do you constantly self-cite/reference? Have you not heard of the Harvard guide to citing references? Shows you haven't been to University I suppose.
ReplyDeleteOh sod off, Beetzart!
ReplyDeleteIMHO there are more answers in plasma experiments than any government files, and there's thousands of years symbolic inertia guiding peoples perceptions. Civil servants or military types don't have a clue generally (not stupid, just institutionalist/narrow/answer hungry/supremacist thinkers etc) and it continues to confuse me why people take what they say so seriously.
ReplyDeleteWhat Disclosure threatens today is the convenient mythos they can overwrite people with after making people do awful and/or illegal things.
Years ago this was a very unpopular way to see things, maybe that's changed, I dunno.
Hey George - any chance of your covering the topic of the British Expert George Spiers dying mysteriously in Poland on the eve of giving a lecture on the topic? Love you on C to C.
ReplyDeleteHi Ben, there are more files on the Cosford incident that they won't release because it relays details of American investigation involvement. I personally feel that they have been delayed or stopped because people like myself and others have found out new information that could potentially up root a whole new coverup of UFOs and the British Government.
ReplyDeleteTo suddenly stop the release means they have found out that some people know too much etc. Trust me this is why and not just because of the 1998 data protection act.
Thanks for the info, Darren, and it doesn't surprise me. I hope there will be a REAL declassification soon.
ReplyDelete