The pineal gland is one of the most interesting parts of the
human body. You've probably never seen yours, unless you've had a brain scan
and been allowed to examine it yourself, but you do have one. Almost all
species in the vertebrate subphylum do- that's fish, sharks, reptiles, birds
and mammals. It is very small, about the size of a grain of rice, and is
located deep in the centre of the brain, but it seems to be crucial to bodily
health. It's shaped like a pine cone, hence its name, and is unique in brain
structures due to its placement on the midline and not being one of a left and
right pair. It produces the hormone melatonin which is responsible for
regulating human sleeping patterns and also changes in our body over the turning
of the seasons. I know from my experience of working night shifts as a hospital
porter that no matter how well I slept during the day I'd still be effected by
drowsiness whilst on duty; this is because despite my roster allocation, my
pineal gland was busy pouring out the usual night time dose of melatonin,
telling my endocrine system that I really should be in bed. The 17th century
French philosopher Rene Descartes claimed that the pineal gland was the
"principle seat of the soul"- where the spiritual and material
aspects of human consciousness interact, in the dualist school. This is known
as the "third eye" in oriental mysticism, connected to psychic powers
and connections with the gods. No scientific research was done into this theory
until the 1990's when Dr Rick Strassman carried out the first legal research
involving psychedelic drugs for almost twenty years, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8-9AHa9YXmM.
His conclusion was that, along with melatonin, the pineal gland also produced N, N-Dimethyltryptamine or
"DMT", a powerful psychotropic chemical. This can be taken as a drug
in many different preparations, but it was not thought to be produced naturally
by the body before Strassman's work. This means that the body has its own means
of generating spiritual and mind-expanding experiences. However because of the
moratorium on psychedelic investigation, this research is several decades
behind where it should be today. Before Dr Strassman, the last scientist to
carry out such experiments with human participants was Prof. Stanislav Grof in
the early 1970's, see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEdxrHud5tE.
The reason for the taboo over psychedelic research is that
it's a spin-off from the criminalization of LSD, along with many other
associated substances, across the world over the course of the 1960's.
Political leaders decided that such drugs were harmful, unhealthy and did
damage to the human mind and, as a result, human society. However this was a
very controversial decision and it remains so to this day. Many of those who
have experienced LSD report that is has extremely beneficial effects, aiding
creativity and spirituality as well as general lightness of being. As always,
there are misadventures too in which those who have taken the drug recklessly
suffer physical and psychological injury as a result, but many think that these
negative stories have grabbed far more than their fair share of the headlines,
see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7D0BeLz5blM.
I find the authorities' attitude towards narcotics very confusing and
contradictory. For instance, there are two drugs that are perfectly legal and
are very widely available and accessible- alcoholic beverages and tobacco
products. The government has no problem with the endemic use of these
substances even though they are the cause of enormous medical and social
problems; cancer, heart disease, road traffic accidents, addiction, violence
etc etc. Naturally these substances are easy to tax and I'm sure that's an
incentive on one level, but could there be a deeper motive? I've recently been
wondering if the secrets our rulers keep from us extend beyond the other
subjects I've spoken of regularly- UFO's, free energy, 9/11 etc, into other
areas of knowledge. People who are spiritually aware and have had psychedelic
experiences are often far less deferential to authority than those who haven't.
They also tend to live a more independent and less conformist lifestyle. What's
more the government seem to like their people to be demoralized and despondent,
the states of mind spiritual experiences can break us out of. I discuss this in
more detail towards the end of my recent lecture at the High Wycombe
paranormal group, see: http://hpanwo-tv.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/ben-emlyn-jones-at-high-wycombe.html.
So it makes sense from their point of view that they'd fear LSD and the changes
it could bring to their relationship with their people. Today there are
increasing moves to medicate drinking water with fluoride. Beginning in the
1940's this contentious practice has spread; more and more water suppliers are
adding fluoride under the pretext that it increases dental health and reduces
tooth decay. However I strongly suspect that the real reason the authorities
are doing it is that it has significant effects on the human mind. It is
apparently increases docility and suggestibility, making people easier to
govern; they'd be less likely to revolt and more likely to collaborate. Also
fluoride does something else that brings us back to the work of Dr Strassman;
it damages the pineal gland.
The pineal gland is very often afflicted over time by a
condition called corporea arenacea- a
Latin term that literally means "body sand", in which calcium
deposits build up inside it. It is so common that it is considered normal and
the process increases slowly as people age, although it has been observed in
people as young as seventeen. Even though the pineal is deep inside the brain
the progress of corporea arenacea can
be observed because the organ shows up better on X-rays as the calcium calluses thicken and solidify. The activity of the pineal is inhibited over time as the
deposits build up and in the 1990's Jennifer Luke, a British scientist,
discovered that fluoride has been found in the pathology reports of corporea arenacea sufferers when
previously the deposits were mostly calcium and phosphorus. Experiments on
animals showed that this new fluoridated form of corporea arenacea greatly reduced the pineal gland's normal
function; melatonin levels became unstable and this led to sleeping disorders
and many other problems. It seemed that the pineal is more vulnerable to
fluoride than any other part of the body; this fact is not recognized by
current government health and safety tests being done related to water fluoridation,
nor its use as an ingredient in toothpaste, see: http://fluoridealert.org/issues/health/pineal-gland/.
Could the governments' drive to add fluoride in our water be connected to their
dread of universal psychedelic awareness because of Dr Strassman's discovery?
Maybe. Either way, it's another good reason to campaign against fluoride in
drinking water.
Very interesting and informative, thanks Ben. I'm glad I purchased that Berkey Water filter now.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Hilary. That's good thinking. My girlfriend has a distiller.
ReplyDeleteGood post Ben. It is not always affordable to purchase the operatus to distill water effectively of it's chloride, indeed, special U.V conduits are the only sure way to remove flouride. Having said this there occurs in natural substances de-calcifying properties especially oregano oil and tamarind also. Although I believe that Consciousness is not the final gate being ambivilent in nature, viz. on one hand deluding and on the other leading us to the door of non dual reality it is however our birthright to navigate its interplay according to our karmic ties in the human realm and the fact that this may be engineered to subdue this free will and to deliberately attempt to keep us operating on restricted frequency is disturbing though we do have the tools to fight back. Clarity all.........
ReplyDeleteCheers, X. I know that there are alternatives to distilling, and indeed that distilling itself may not be the most health option and could even be harmful. I do not distill my own water, although if my area's water provider did fluoridate, I would. As it happens neither Sue nor myself live in such an area yet. But Sue is "getting her defence in first!"
ReplyDeleteGreat post thanks Ben I think it might be worth noting that many "anti-depressants" are flouride based and have a simlar effect. I am trying to decalcify by using a water filter in the main which is not that expensive (about £50) and easy to install if you can manage a couple of easy fit pipe connectors. So far so good and as Bill Hicks said Life is just a ride !!!
ReplyDelete