Sunday, 30 August 2026

Clive Lewis on UFO's

 
The Sol Foundation has published the most surprising interview. One thing I've often complained about is that the current post-2017 Disclosure movement is centred on, driven by and almost exclusively engaged in by the United States of America. I'm British and passionately enthusiastic about ET Disclosure, almost to the point of obsession; as regular readers will know very well. There is no reason why the United States should be the leader of this quest. We're not in the Cold War anymore and global politics is now distinctly multi-polar. Nobody else has appointed the US to this position. This is not America's fault. At the end of the day, the cause of the US being the prime workhorse of this mission is because other countries are too lazy and/or narrow-minded. I'm afraid it's that simple. American lawmakers have got off their butts and dared to do what few other elected officials ever have. As much as I admire American heroes like Tim Burchett, Anna Paulina Luna and Eric Burlison, my patriotism is resisting. I can't stand the Yanks beating us! I'm pleased to say that a UK Member of Parliament has finally spoken out; he has been featured on an hour-long interview with Sol's co-founder Peter Skafish. Clive Lewis is MP for Norwich South and was first elected in 2015 after working as a BBC journalist and military reservist. He was Shadow Defence Secretary under Jeremy Corbyn. His father is from Grenada, like Sir Eric Gairy, which might be why he says he had an interest in UFO's as a child. He became a skeptic as he grew up and was educated, but something has rekindled his interest. He does the interview from his home, dressed casually; but he is obviously not appearing against the orders of his authority. The Prime Minister at the time of recording, Keir Starmer, may not have positively approved, but he has not vetoed Lewis at all. Behind Lewis is a children's painting of a space rocket, probably done by his eight year old daughter. Mr Lewis shares my wish that British officials should follow the example set by our American peers. He calls for greater transparency for this reason. Strangely, and significantly, he does not mention any specific case. You'd think he would refer to some of them, or at least our most prominent and by far best documented one, the Rendlesham Forest Incident. Is this just an oversight on his part or is he omitting details deliberately? If so then despite that, he is a proponent of transparency, as I said. He is open to the idea that UAP are artefacts of a non-human intelligence. He thinks, as many people do, that the acknowledgement of ET civilization could give all people in the world a sense of common humanity. Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoUr0rsb7rU.
 
Despite what I've said here, we "Limeys" have never ignored the UFO phenomenon completely. Actually we set up one of the first investigations in the world back in 1942 under the direct leadership of Winston Churchill, to solve the mystery of the "foo-fighters", see: https://hpanwo-voice.blogspot.com/2017/02/churchill-on-ufos.html. This was several years before Project Sign in the USA. We have had our own close encounters, abductions and crash-retrievals. We have had a number of government research projects over the years run by the Ministry of Defence and intelligence agencies. We have a nationwide network of civilian research groups that are often highly organized and carry out field research in a very professional manner. We also have our home-grown UFO hero in the shape of Peter Baron Hill-Norton, a former Chief of the Defence Staff and joint organizer of NATO. He was quite blunt and unequivocal in his belief that UFO's constituted alien visitation and was vocally opposed to all secrecy. His speeches in the House of Lords are classics in the history of Disclosure. Really, any state actor in the world could do this. Nobody needs to sit around waiting for another nation to start the ball rolling. All countries experience UFO's; probably dozens of them have the kind of decisive physical evidence necessary for Disclosure. To be the Disclosure nation would result in a lot of historical prestige. I really don't care who does it so long as somebody does; but if it were to be my own country of course I'd feel very proud.
See here for background: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2020/02/ufo-disclosure-portal.html.

at

9 comments:

  1. Missing Trillions30 August 2026 at 22:12

    There is a transglobal state to which individual states, including the US and UK are subordinate. Disclosure is one of a number of issues in the hands of the global state such that individual states are not in a position to act independently. I wouldn't trust Clive Lewis as far as I could throw him. He was opposed to Brexit and advocated for completely free movement within the EU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ben Emlyn-Jones30 August 2026 at 22:19

      I agree on Clive Lewis' politics. He's way to the left of me. That being said, D is not a product of a decision by the Illuminati globalist occupation. It is clearly an act of rebellion by "white hats". That is unless we're dealing with fake D, as you have suggested yourself many times. Either way, I'm sure Clive has no idea about that level of the coverup.

      Delete
  2. Missing Trillions1 September 2026 at 06:20

    "White hats" exist only as a form of headgear or as people in your imagination.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ben Emlyn-Jones1 September 2026 at 12:32

      Well, as we've discussed before, I don't agree. However, the concept does come from literal dressing codes. In the early Hollywood Westerns it was traditional for the good cowboy to wear a white hat and the bandits all had black hats.

      Delete
  3. Anonymous3 September 2026 at 18:34

    'White hats' is an inversion conspiracy theory spread by Russian propagandists following the use of chemical weapons by Assad against his own people during the Syrian uprising and subsequent war. The 'White Helmets where the Syrian civil defence force at the time' who first reported it and the subsequent denial by the Syrian government and attempted cover up by the Russian intelligence service. The accusation was the 'White helmets' were deliberately planting evidence of chemicals attacks after the fact. When all the propaganda was proven as such the narrative shifted to the 'White helmets' being infiltrated and funded by the west. The term 'White hats' was then used in the subsequent Russian financed and backed (though not originally developed by) 'QANON' conspiracy as a 'undercover good guys in the administration' as a nod to the previous propaganda operation. The subsequent QANON theory was proven to be spread via Philippine based chat room owner of 8CHAN (ex 4CHAN) by several whistleblowers most notable Frederick Brennan (sadly passed recently) after the original source and hoaxer ( Paul Furber) had his account hacked but obviously couldn't own up to being 'Q' and therefore a hoaxer. As a side note the owners son ( Ron Watkins) ran in the last US election on the whole MAGA QANON thing and failed to get past the primaries "QANAON The storm is upon us" is a good breakdown of the entire conspiracy theory. Sadly for most of us we can now see the outcome of how foolish the nonsense was with Trump now in office heavily reliant on culture war politics and conspiracies to keep their base happy but entirely incompetent at running the administration for the interests of the US people and only their own pockets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ben Emlyn-Jones3 September 2026 at 18:42

      No, the term "white hat" actually preceded the incident in Syria. Dave Starbuck used to use it back in the 2000's. I'm no longer a fan of Trump, but it's not for the reasons you say nor its connection to the "17th letter" (You should actually say the real word because Blogger might delete your comment). My full report is here: https://hpanwo.blogspot.com/2022/08/pr-portal.html

      Delete
  4. Anonymous3 September 2026 at 19:18

    The term white hat was never in popular culture conspiracies before QANON. It was however used as a term for ethical hackers (again see 4CHAN and the link to QANON) or as you point out the 30-40's cowboy good guy/bad guy origin. Dave used it in the same context (some undercover good guy) It could well be that Paul Furber picked up on this to spin the yarn with more threads but not as part of UFO lore ingrained in QANON.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous3 September 2026 at 19:24

    Wiki/AI source. In modern conspiracy lore, the concept of "White Hats" originates from the QAnon movement starting in late 2017, where it describes a secret faction of military and intelligence officials working from within to dismantle a global cabal ("Black Hats"). The term itself traces its symbolic roots back to early American Western films, where heroes wore white hats to signal goodness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ben Emlyn-Jones3 September 2026 at 22:43

      Sure, I'm aware that the context in the 17th letter thing obviously has been adopted by that community, but we really agree because Starbuck used it long before then. He also used it with more or less the same definition. As I've said, the "Plan" never worked, but the entire 17th letter origins is more complex.

      Delete