tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post4503162344676596208..comments2024-03-28T13:35:40.706+00:00Comments on HPANWO Voice: CERN disproves Ghosts?Ben Emlyn-Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-83099220503787527512017-03-01T20:20:02.773+00:002017-03-01T20:20:02.773+00:00https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxLtBQA0mtw&ab...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxLtBQA0mtw&ab_channel=DonPhilipsAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-58056796986491342312017-02-28T17:59:01.654+00:002017-02-28T17:59:01.654+00:00Ben, I have seen RDH's film on Stephen Hawking...Ben, I have seen RDH's film on Stephen Hawking but I do not believe the theory is applicable to Cox. The answer is far more banal, much like the man himself. White male academics have realised that to be promoted in the current university climate of extreme political correctness, cultural Marxism, and reverse discrimination, one must out-do the atheists and feminists at their own game. The gits are atheist feminists to a "man" (Dawkins being another good example). Shameful cowards that they are. Laurencenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-26967954029941818912017-02-28T08:58:14.712+00:002017-02-28T08:58:14.712+00:00Cheers, Laurence. You're making a lot more sen...Cheers, Laurence. You're making a lot more sense than Cox is. I wonder about his background too. Have seen the idea that Stephen Hawking is more than one person? Richard D Hall has talked about it. Maybe the Coxxer is something similar. I have listened to Neil deGrasse Tyson a few times and I find him far more credible than Cox. He's certainly more modest and open-minded. It's a shame more pop scientists are not like him. Instead we get stuck-up media whores like Cox-Head.Ben Emlyn-Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-61463082546109235822017-02-27T19:10:16.610+00:002017-02-27T19:10:16.610+00:00Hello Ben, very good article. Just to add to your ...Hello Ben, very good article. Just to add to your piece, I don't know about you but I find Cox rather unintelligible for a Professor of physics. For example, he once said memorably that he was the trustee of a London school with, "90% ethnic minorities". In this respect, Cox requires considerable deciphering. I believe what the Prof. was trying to say was as follows: <br /><br />For a ghost to manifest there must be a medium that carries the pattern [sic.] of the physical matter of that person, which cannot be measured or detected. To which I would reply--in the style of Angry Frank--"Oi! Cox! No! Human beings have souls!" In other words, Cox is saying that, because he's an atheist (in the event of the absence of a soul), it is difficult to imagine a spirit! Not very original, is it? <br /><br />Cox then goes on a bizarre non sequitur regarding LHC measurement limitations to date. In the same way, Cox refers, qualitatively, to an energy scale [sic.] when the obvious scientific thing to do would be to define the energy level in Joules; instead Cox confuses everybody and then appears to draw his own line on the discussion, thus ensuring no awkward questioning. The only chink of light (and credit where credit is due, at least, to deGrasse) was Cox's affirmative to the final question, quantitatively demonstrating the his preference for the unverified and unverifiable. <br /><br />Should this be the standard of university physics professors in the UK then God help us all.Laurencenoreply@blogger.com