tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post2370859230469655851..comments2024-03-28T13:35:40.706+00:00Comments on HPANWO Voice: The Larry Warren Controversy- Part 27Ben Emlyn-Joneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-19204823246788705612017-12-07T15:40:42.313+00:002017-12-07T15:40:42.313+00:00I will no longer be accepting comments in this box...I will no longer be accepting comments in this box until there are updates on Larry Warren's case.Ben Emlyn-Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-6852755019475214622017-12-03T20:03:01.325+00:002017-12-03T20:03:01.325+00:00Golfghost, now you are simply being rude. I'm ...Golfghost, now you are simply being rude. I'm not publishing your comment.<br />Anon, please get back in touch when the full story comes out. Thanks :-) Ben Emlyn-Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-47100138561198466232017-12-03T18:37:03.135+00:002017-12-03T18:37:03.135+00:00Anon, I didn't hear you making these comments ...Anon, I didn't hear you making these comments when a polygraph test was used to verify Travis Walton's experience... You're clutching at straws with the difference between "world" and "UK". That's pure semantics.<br />The party's over.<br />Larry has been exonerated and you know it, even though I'm sure you will never admit it. Future publications of evidence will only reinforce that inevitable outcome.Ben Emlyn-Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-46643807930058355472017-12-03T18:12:23.077+00:002017-12-03T18:12:23.077+00:00http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsite...http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=10420<br />Shall I keep going? <br />Ben what other real evidence do you have?<br />All I have seen on the blog is words.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-47671669340427042512017-12-03T17:58:46.496+00:002017-12-03T17:58:46.496+00:00How Much would You like to see Ben before You admi...How Much would You like to see Ben before You admit the same conclusions the real experts do?<br />https://www.nap.edu/read/10420/chapter/7Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-46651294741600192032017-12-03T17:34:54.560+00:002017-12-03T17:34:54.560+00:00Now Ben is exaggerating the facts!
Gary Heseltine ...Now Ben is exaggerating the facts!<br />Gary Heseltine stated it's a UK leading expert now Ben states it's a Worlds leading expert, So which one is it?<br /><br />So You know better than the studies done already Ben stating they are not accurate as per links?<br />Time to find more University PDF files stating in the conclusion that polygraph tests are not 100% accurate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-29992198440244106732017-12-03T15:35:31.141+00:002017-12-03T15:35:31.141+00:00Anon and Golfghost. I can't reveal any details...Anon and Golfghost. I can't reveal any details at the moment, but I know that the test Larry was subjected to was the absolute best available by one of the world's leading experts. Bear in mind that this test is not a standalone piece of data; it is part of a much larger investigation into Larry Warren's case. You will have to regard it in that context and that includes the rest of the information in this article series. I don't think I've been closed-minded at all. I have responded to your comments in the same tone they were made ;-) Please watch this space for updates. Ben Emlyn-Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-86936181444863089322017-12-03T14:45:31.448+00:002017-12-03T14:45:31.448+00:00Ben you say that modern polygraphs are very reliab...Ben you say that modern polygraphs are very reliable, but critics believe that polygraphs are only successful about 70% of the time, and this percentage rapidly drops with potential use of drugs to mask a reading by a subject, even special forces units, the CIA are now trained to beat the polygraph, by meditation and breathing exercises, and reports offer that this reduces the polygraph success rate down to between 10 and 17% .I think if I had a machine or car that only worked at most 70% of the time I would not call it reliable, I'm also hoping that the results of Larry passing a drug test beforehand will be available, as this is one of the allegations that he was a drug user, As for claims of inaccuracy where would you like to start? the numerous serial killers who successfully passed the polygraph, maybe Aldrich Ames, it does not take much research to find anyone who has beaten a polygraph and may I suggest That I don't agree with Anons touch of Sarcasm attacking you, I also find your lack of research and openness to the genuine points that Anon has made, actually quite short sighted and very closed minded.golfghostnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-7088243630091143372017-12-03T14:25:46.453+00:002017-12-03T14:25:46.453+00:00https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=31737https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=31737Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-30432052266424885992017-12-03T14:18:03.760+00:002017-12-03T14:18:03.760+00:00I can provide article after article, university pd...I can provide article after article, university pdf file after pdf file.<br />I think it's you that is misguided.<br />Let me know if you want more?<br />It's not about going down with a sinking ship and you know it, it's about being open with evidence whenever the road leads, if evidence came along that is beyond doubt that Larry is telling the truth, i would also post that , it's not about sticking with buddies or looking after a brand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-75065161779155463692017-12-03T14:12:34.904+00:002017-12-03T14:12:34.904+00:00http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/2802#...http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/2802#.WiQFsnqnzmwAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-50890115266250185132017-12-03T14:03:15.033+00:002017-12-03T14:03:15.033+00:00http://www.keepcalmtalklaw.co.uk/true-problem-with...http://www.keepcalmtalklaw.co.uk/true-problem-with-lie-detectors/Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-18715984129600544142017-12-02T15:38:10.154+00:002017-12-02T15:38:10.154+00:00Anon, I can assure you that the polygraph done was...Anon, I can assure you that the polygraph done was the best service available. Modern polygraphs are very reliable indeed. You've not given any examples of your claims of inaccuracy for them and you fill the rest of your post with mindless rhetoric. I think you know you're going down with a sinking ship and you're scared.Ben Emlyn-Joneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13858990047274822000noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2907980016894811549.post-28433401821480502082017-12-02T15:34:32.972+00:002017-12-02T15:34:32.972+00:00And You know all about polygraph tests being the e...And You know all about polygraph tests being the expert?<br />No did not think so!<br />The evidence confined to a polygraph tests cannot be used in a court of law as they give off positive and negative results dependent on the subject.<br />Liars have both passed and failed, those telling the truth the same.<br />Mass murderers have even passed the test.<br /><br />You cannot have one single bit of evidence and announce its definitive that is just absurd however lets see the rest of the details in regards to the test and the questions asked, or was a drug test taken prior to the test? did you have a 3rd party adjudicator present?<br />What do other experts think of polygraph tests?<br />Any expert whim sells the test for a living if course they will say it works.<br />McDonalds sell bad food and claim its not unhealthy however other experts like doctors will advise the opposite.<br /><br />Tiny minds only look at one piece of evidence.<br />Researchers? LMFAO.<br />The whole UK UFO scene is bollox.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com